Kaja Balazy, Dariusz Jakubas, Andrzej Kotarba, Katarzyna Wojczulanis‐Jakubas
{"title":"Illuminating the Arctic: Unveiling seabird responses to artificial light during polar darkness through citizen science and remote sensing","authors":"Kaja Balazy, Dariusz Jakubas, Andrzej Kotarba, Katarzyna Wojczulanis‐Jakubas","doi":"10.1002/rse2.425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial light at night (ALAN) has global impacts on animals, often negative, yet its effects in polar regions remains largely underexplored. These regions experience prolonged darkness during the polar night, while human activity and artificial lighting are rapidly increasing. In this study, we analyzed a decade of citizen science data on light‐sensitive seabird occurrences in Longyearbyen, a High‐Arctic port settlement, to examine the impact of environmental factors including ALAN during polar night. Our investigation incorporated remote sensing data on nighttime lights levels, sea ice presence, and air temperature measurements from local meteorological station. Our findings reveal that artificial light may potentially impact seabird diversity in this region, with overall diversity decreasing alongside light intensity. However, the relationship between artificial light and seabird diversity was not uniformly negative; individual species exhibited varied responses. We also detected a correlation between artificial light and air temperature, emphasizing the complexity of environmental interactions. Notably, the piscivorous Black Guillemot (<jats:italic>Cepphus grylle</jats:italic>), the dominant species in Longyearbyen during the polar night, showed increased contribution in the local seabird assemblage with higher light levels. In contrast, the zooplanktivorous Little Auk (<jats:italic>Alle alle</jats:italic>) exhibited reduced contribution with higher light intensity and increased presence with higher air temperatures. We hypothesize that these differing responses are closely tied to the distinct dietary habits, varying sensitivity to artificial light due to individual adaptations, and overall ecological flexibility of these species, underscoring the need for further research. This study, which uniquely combines citizen science with remote sensing data, represents the first effort to systematically assess the effects of artificial lighting on seabirds during the polar night. The findings underscore the potential importance of this issue for seabird conservation in polar regions.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial light at night (ALAN) has global impacts on animals, often negative, yet its effects in polar regions remains largely underexplored. These regions experience prolonged darkness during the polar night, while human activity and artificial lighting are rapidly increasing. In this study, we analyzed a decade of citizen science data on light‐sensitive seabird occurrences in Longyearbyen, a High‐Arctic port settlement, to examine the impact of environmental factors including ALAN during polar night. Our investigation incorporated remote sensing data on nighttime lights levels, sea ice presence, and air temperature measurements from local meteorological station. Our findings reveal that artificial light may potentially impact seabird diversity in this region, with overall diversity decreasing alongside light intensity. However, the relationship between artificial light and seabird diversity was not uniformly negative; individual species exhibited varied responses. We also detected a correlation between artificial light and air temperature, emphasizing the complexity of environmental interactions. Notably, the piscivorous Black Guillemot (Cepphus grylle), the dominant species in Longyearbyen during the polar night, showed increased contribution in the local seabird assemblage with higher light levels. In contrast, the zooplanktivorous Little Auk (Alle alle) exhibited reduced contribution with higher light intensity and increased presence with higher air temperatures. We hypothesize that these differing responses are closely tied to the distinct dietary habits, varying sensitivity to artificial light due to individual adaptations, and overall ecological flexibility of these species, underscoring the need for further research. This study, which uniquely combines citizen science with remote sensing data, represents the first effort to systematically assess the effects of artificial lighting on seabirds during the polar night. The findings underscore the potential importance of this issue for seabird conservation in polar regions.
夜间人工照明(ALAN)对全球动物都有影响,而且往往是负面的,但其对极地地区的影响在很大程度上仍未得到充分探索。这些地区在极夜会经历长时间的黑暗,而人类活动和人工照明却在迅速增加。在这项研究中,我们分析了高纬度北极港口居民点朗伊尔城十年来对光敏感的海鸟出现情况的公民科学数据,以研究包括 ALAN 在内的环境因素对极夜的影响。我们的调查结合了夜间灯光亮度、海冰存在情况的遥感数据以及当地气象站的气温测量数据。我们的研究结果表明,人工光照可能会对该地区的海鸟多样性产生潜在影响,总体多样性会随着光照强度的降低而降低。然而,人工光照与海鸟多样性之间的关系并不是一致的负相关;个别物种表现出不同的反应。我们还检测到人工光照与气温之间的相关性,强调了环境相互作用的复杂性。值得注意的是,食鱼的黑斑鸠(Cepphus grylle)是朗伊尔城极夜的主要物种,它在当地海鸟群中的比例随着光照度的增加而增加。与此相反,浮游动物小白头翁(Alle alle)则表现出光照强度越高,其贡献率越低,而气温越高,其存在率越高。我们推测,这些不同的反应与这些物种不同的饮食习惯、个体适应性导致的对人工光照的不同敏感度以及整体生态灵活性密切相关,这也强调了进一步研究的必要性。这项研究将公民科学与遥感数据独特地结合在一起,是系统评估极夜人工照明对海鸟影响的首次尝试。研究结果强调了这一问题对极地海鸟保护的潜在重要性。
期刊介绍:
emote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation provides a forum for rapid, peer-reviewed publication of novel, multidisciplinary research at the interface between remote sensing science and ecology and conservation. The journal prioritizes findings that advance the scientific basis of ecology and conservation, promoting the development of remote-sensing based methods relevant to the management of land use and biological systems at all levels, from populations and species to ecosystems and biomes. The journal defines remote sensing in its broadest sense, including data acquisition by hand-held and fixed ground-based sensors, such as camera traps and acoustic recorders, and sensors on airplanes and satellites. The intended journal’s audience includes ecologists, conservation scientists, policy makers, managers of terrestrial and aquatic systems, remote sensing scientists, and students.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation is a fully open access journal from Wiley and the Zoological Society of London. Remote sensing has enormous potential as to provide information on the state of, and pressures on, biological diversity and ecosystem services, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. This new publication provides a forum for multidisciplinary research in remote sensing science, ecological research and conservation science.