Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Wenfeng Li, Jiangyi Wang, Guopeng Yu, Bao Hua, Xin Gu, Shangqing Song, Chao Lu, Lin Zhou, Long Li, Yushan Liu, Qing Yang, Bin Xu
{"title":"Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Wenfeng Li, Jiangyi Wang, Guopeng Yu, Bao Hua, Xin Gu, Shangqing Song, Chao Lu, Lin Zhou, Long Li, Yushan Liu, Qing Yang, Bin Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether argon-beam-coagulation (ABC) suture-free technique results in more favorable renal function than conventional suture technique after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, open-label randomized controlled study. A total of 32 patients with T1a renal tumor and R.E.N.A.L score ≤7 were recruited. The primary endpoint of the study was the absolute variation of the ipsilateral split renal function (SRF) at 12 months. The following secondary endpoints were addressed: the 1, 3, 6, and 12-months variation of eGFR; the 1, 3, 6-months variation of SRF; perioperative outcomes (including operative time, warm ischemia time, time to hemostasis, blood loss).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suture-free group had a significantly shorter operative time (90.4 ± 22.0 minutes vs. 117.8 ± 23.5 minutes, p = 0.003) and warm ischemia time (9.6 ± 4.7 minutes vs. 21.3 ± 8.3 minutes, p < 0.001) than the suture group. At the last follow-up, the change of ipsilateral SRF was 7.5 ± 5.1 ml/min for the suture-free group and 13.1 ± 6.7 ml/min for the suture group (p = 0.014). The change of eGFR demonstrated a similar trend (5.5 ± 4.4 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 6.0 ml/min, p=0.001). Multivariate linear analysis confirmed that suture-free technique was associated with a less decrease of renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suture-free partial nephrectomy is a feasible technique for T1a renal masses and benefits long-term SRF and eGFR compared to conventional procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether argon-beam-coagulation (ABC) suture-free technique results in more favorable renal function than conventional suture technique after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Methods: This study was a single-center, open-label randomized controlled study. A total of 32 patients with T1a renal tumor and R.E.N.A.L score ≤7 were recruited. The primary endpoint of the study was the absolute variation of the ipsilateral split renal function (SRF) at 12 months. The following secondary endpoints were addressed: the 1, 3, 6, and 12-months variation of eGFR; the 1, 3, 6-months variation of SRF; perioperative outcomes (including operative time, warm ischemia time, time to hemostasis, blood loss).

Results: The suture-free group had a significantly shorter operative time (90.4 ± 22.0 minutes vs. 117.8 ± 23.5 minutes, p = 0.003) and warm ischemia time (9.6 ± 4.7 minutes vs. 21.3 ± 8.3 minutes, p < 0.001) than the suture group. At the last follow-up, the change of ipsilateral SRF was 7.5 ± 5.1 ml/min for the suture-free group and 13.1 ± 6.7 ml/min for the suture group (p = 0.014). The change of eGFR demonstrated a similar trend (5.5 ± 4.4 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 6.0 ml/min, p=0.001). Multivariate linear analysis confirmed that suture-free technique was associated with a less decrease of renal function.

Conclusions: Suture-free partial nephrectomy is a feasible technique for T1a renal masses and benefits long-term SRF and eGFR compared to conventional procedure.

使用氩激光凝固器的腹腔镜无缝线肾部分切除术:单中心、开放标签随机对照试验的手术技术和结果。
目的确定氩离子束凝固(ABC)无缝合技术是否比传统缝合技术在腹腔镜肾部分切除术后更有利于肾功能:本研究是一项单中心、开放标签随机对照研究。共招募了32名T1a肾肿瘤且R.E.N.A.L评分≤7分的患者。研究的主要终点是12个月时同侧分裂肾功能(SRF)的绝对变化。次要终点包括:1、3、6 和 12 个月的 eGFR 变化;1、3、6 个月的 SRF 变化;围术期结果(包括手术时间、温缺血时间、止血时间、失血量):结果:无缝线组的手术时间(90.4 ± 22.0 分钟 vs. 117.8 ± 23.5 分钟,P = 0.003)和热缺血时间(9.6 ± 4.7 分钟 vs. 21.3 ± 8.3 分钟,P < 0.001)明显短于缝线组。最后一次随访时,无缝线组同侧 SRF 的变化为 7.5 ± 5.1 毫升/分钟,缝线组为 13.1 ± 6.7 毫升/分钟(P = 0.014)。eGFR 的变化趋势相似(5.5 ± 4.4 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 6.0 ml/min,p=0.001)。多变量线性分析证实,无缝线技术与肾功能下降较少有关:结论:无缝线肾部分切除术是治疗T1a肾肿块的一种可行技术,与传统手术相比,它有利于长期SRF和eGFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信