Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Daisuke Yoshimura, Jun Kawamata, Shoji Fukuta, Yuka Shimasaki, Daisuke Kita, Koichi Sairyo
{"title":"Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Daisuke Yoshimura, Jun Kawamata, Shoji Fukuta, Yuka Shimasaki, Daisuke Kita, Koichi Sairyo","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score is widely used as a clinician-reported outcome after shoulder surgery. However, Shoulder36 is positioned as a general patient-reported outcome measure. This study aimed to determine the correlations between the JOA score and scores in the domains of the Shoulder36 and their minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and cutoff values for the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) after unilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 145 patients using the JOA score and Shoulder36 before and 1 year after surgery. The MCID and PASS cutoff values were determined by patients' responses to the following anchor item: A, none (\"no good at all\"); B, poor (\"some effect but unsatisfactory\"); C, good (\"satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness\"); D, excellent (\"ideal response, virtually pain-free\"). The correlations between the JOA score and the domains of the Shoulder36 were statistically calculated. The border between B and C was defined as the threshold for PASS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant correlations between the JOA score and the Shoulder36 domains. The responses to the anchor item were as follows: A (n = 0), B (n = 21), C (n = 76), and D (n = 48). The MCID for the JOA score was 19.5 points and the MCIDs for Shoulder36 were 0.5 points for pain, 0.667 for range of motion, 0.67 for muscle strength, 0.3 for general health, 0.571 for activities of daily living, and 1.0 for sports ability. The PASS cutoff value was 89.0 points for the JOA score and 3.8 points for pain, 3.667 for range of motion, 3.0 for muscle strength, 3.7 for general health, 3.7 for activities of daily living, and 3.0 for sports ability in the Shoulder36.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MCID and cutoff PASS values for the JOA score and Shoulder36 identified in this study will help to determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary management after ARCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Japan, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score is widely used as a clinician-reported outcome after shoulder surgery. However, Shoulder36 is positioned as a general patient-reported outcome measure. This study aimed to determine the correlations between the JOA score and scores in the domains of the Shoulder36 and their minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and cutoff values for the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) after unilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

Methods: We evaluated 145 patients using the JOA score and Shoulder36 before and 1 year after surgery. The MCID and PASS cutoff values were determined by patients' responses to the following anchor item: A, none ("no good at all"); B, poor ("some effect but unsatisfactory"); C, good ("satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness"); D, excellent ("ideal response, virtually pain-free"). The correlations between the JOA score and the domains of the Shoulder36 were statistically calculated. The border between B and C was defined as the threshold for PASS.

Results: There were significant correlations between the JOA score and the Shoulder36 domains. The responses to the anchor item were as follows: A (n = 0), B (n = 21), C (n = 76), and D (n = 48). The MCID for the JOA score was 19.5 points and the MCIDs for Shoulder36 were 0.5 points for pain, 0.667 for range of motion, 0.67 for muscle strength, 0.3 for general health, 0.571 for activities of daily living, and 1.0 for sports ability. The PASS cutoff value was 89.0 points for the JOA score and 3.8 points for pain, 3.667 for range of motion, 3.0 for muscle strength, 3.7 for general health, 3.7 for activities of daily living, and 3.0 for sports ability in the Shoulder36.

Conclusions: The MCID and cutoff PASS values for the JOA score and Shoulder36 identified in this study will help to determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary management after ARCR.

日本骨科协会评分与肩关节镜下肩袖修复术后临床意义最小差异 36:回顾性队列研究。
背景:在日本,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分被广泛用作肩部手术后临床医生报告的结果。然而,Shoulder36 被定位为患者报告的一般结果测量指标。本研究旨在确定单侧关节镜肩袖修复术(ARCR)后 JOA 评分与 Shoulder36 各领域评分之间的相关性及其最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的临界值:我们使用 JOA 评分和 Shoulder36 对 145 名患者进行了术前和术后一年的评估。根据患者对以下锚点项目的回答确定 MCID 和 PASS 临界值:A,无("完全没有效果");B,差("有一定效果,但不令人满意");C,好("效果令人满意,但偶尔出现疼痛或僵硬");D,优("效果理想,几乎无痛")。统计计算了 JOA 评分与 Shoulder36 领域之间的相关性。B 和 C 之间的边界被定义为 PASS 临界值:结果:JOA 分数与 Shoulder36 领域之间存在明显的相关性。对锚点项目的回答如下:A(n = 0)、B(n = 21)、C(n = 76)和 D(n = 48)。JOA 评分的 MCID 为 19.5 分,而 Shoulder36 的 MCID 分别为:疼痛 0.5 分、活动范围 0.667 分、肌肉力量 0.67 分、一般健康 0.3 分、日常生活活动 0.571 分和运动能力 1.0 分。在 Shoulder36.Conclusions 中,JOA 评分的 PASS 临界值为 89.0 分,疼痛为 3.8 分,活动范围为 3.667 分,肌肉力量为 3.0 分,一般健康为 3.7 分,日常生活活动为 3.7 分,运动能力为 3.0 分:本研究确定的 JOA 评分和肩关节 36 的 MCID 和 PASS 临界值将有助于确定 ARCR 后多学科管理的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信