Dexmedetomidine for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Sagee Nissimov, Amitai Kohn, Rimona Keidar, Ayelet Livne, Mazal Shemer, Ayala Gover, Calanit Hershkovich-Shporen, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Iris Morag
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Sagee Nissimov, Amitai Kohn, Rimona Keidar, Ayelet Livne, Mazal Shemer, Ayala Gover, Calanit Hershkovich-Shporen, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Iris Morag","doi":"10.1007/s40272-024-00667-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) involves delivering surfactant to a spontaneously breathing infant by passing a thin catheter through the vocal cords and has become the preferred method for surfactant delivery. However, the role of pre-LISA sedation remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the use of dexmedetomidine for LISA in preterm and early-term infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated preterm and early-term infants who received intravenous dexmedetomidine for LISA between December 2022 and March 2024. Primary outcomes included safety parameters such as the absence of bradycardia, hypotension, hypothermia, or respiratory depression, and the success rate of LISA, determined by the lack of endotracheal intubation within 72 h. Intergroup comparison based on a cutoff of 32 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven infants were included. The mean ± SD PMA at birth, birth weight, and age at LISA were 32.2 ± 2.7 weeks, 1879 ± 698 g, and 13.9 ± 12.4 h, respectively. Mean dexmedetomidine dosage was 0.66 ± 0.26 μg/kg. Six patients (16.2%) developed mild hypothermia, and 10 (27%) experienced apnea/bradycardia within 24 h. The success rate of the procedure was 89.2%. Infants born before 32 weeks received lower doses of dexmedetomidine than those born at 32 weeks and above (0.54 ± 0.24 versus 0.76 ± 0.24 μg/kg, p < 0.01). Safety and success rates of LISA were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first report on dexmedetomidine as pre-LISA sedation, demonstrating its feasibility with comparable success rates regardless of PMA. These findings may inform future studies on sedation strategies for LISA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-024-00667-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) involves delivering surfactant to a spontaneously breathing infant by passing a thin catheter through the vocal cords and has become the preferred method for surfactant delivery. However, the role of pre-LISA sedation remains unclear.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the use of dexmedetomidine for LISA in preterm and early-term infants.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated preterm and early-term infants who received intravenous dexmedetomidine for LISA between December 2022 and March 2024. Primary outcomes included safety parameters such as the absence of bradycardia, hypotension, hypothermia, or respiratory depression, and the success rate of LISA, determined by the lack of endotracheal intubation within 72 h. Intergroup comparison based on a cutoff of 32 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) was performed.

Results: Thirty-seven infants were included. The mean ± SD PMA at birth, birth weight, and age at LISA were 32.2 ± 2.7 weeks, 1879 ± 698 g, and 13.9 ± 12.4 h, respectively. Mean dexmedetomidine dosage was 0.66 ± 0.26 μg/kg. Six patients (16.2%) developed mild hypothermia, and 10 (27%) experienced apnea/bradycardia within 24 h. The success rate of the procedure was 89.2%. Infants born before 32 weeks received lower doses of dexmedetomidine than those born at 32 weeks and above (0.54 ± 0.24 versus 0.76 ± 0.24 μg/kg, p < 0.01). Safety and success rates of LISA were similar across groups.

Conclusion: This is the first report on dexmedetomidine as pre-LISA sedation, demonstrating its feasibility with comparable success rates regardless of PMA. These findings may inform future studies on sedation strategies for LISA.

右美托咪定用于微创表面活性物质给药:试点研究
导言:微创表面活性物质给药(LISA)是指通过一根细导管穿过声带向自主呼吸的婴儿输送表面活性物质,已成为输送表面活性物质的首选方法。然而,LISA 前镇静的作用仍不明确:本研究旨在描述右美托咪定在早产儿和早产儿 LISA 中的使用情况:这项回顾性研究评估了 2022 年 12 月至 2024 年 3 月期间接受静脉注射右美托咪定进行 LISA 的早产儿和早产儿。主要结果包括安全性参数(如无心动过缓、低血压、低体温或呼吸抑制)和 LISA 成功率(以 72 小时内未进行气管插管为准):结果:共纳入 37 名婴儿。出生时平均(±SD)PMA、出生体重和LISA年龄分别为32.2±2.7周、1879±698克和13.9±12.4小时。右美托咪定的平均用量为 0.66 ± 0.26 μg/kg。6名患者(16.2%)出现轻度体温过低,10名患者(27%)在24小时内出现呼吸暂停/心动过缓。与 32 周及以上出生的婴儿相比,32 周前出生的婴儿使用的右美托咪定剂量较低(0.54 ± 0.24 对 0.76 ± 0.24 μg/kg, p 结论:这是第一例使用右美托咪定的婴儿:这是第一份关于右美托咪定作为LISA前镇静剂的报告,证明了其可行性,无论PMA如何,成功率相当。这些发现可为今后的 LISA 镇静策略研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信