Joachim Sejr Skovbo, Nicklas Sindlev Andersen, Lasse Møllegaard Obel, Malene Skaarup Laursen, Andreas Stoklund Riis, Kim Christian Houlind, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Jes Sanddal Lindholt
{"title":"Individual risk assessment for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm using artificial intelligence.","authors":"Joachim Sejr Skovbo, Nicklas Sindlev Andersen, Lasse Møllegaard Obel, Malene Skaarup Laursen, Andreas Stoklund Riis, Kim Christian Houlind, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Jes Sanddal Lindholt","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a prediction tool to identify abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) at increased risk of rupture incorporating demographic, clinical, imaging, and medication data using artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A development and validation study for individual prognosis using AI in a case-control design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From two Danish hospitals, all available ruptured AAA cases between January 2009 and December 2016 were included in a ratio of 1:2 with elective surgery controls. Cases with previous AAA surgery or missing pre-operative scans were excluded. Features from computed tomography angiography scans and hospital records were manually retrieved. The sample was divided randomly and evenly into developmental and internal validation groups. A SHapley Additive exPlanations Feature Importance Rank Ensembling (SHAPFire) AI tool was developed using a gradient boosting decision tree framework. The final SHAPFire AI model was compared with models using 1) solely infrarenal anterior-posterior-diameter, and 2) all available features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 637 individuals (84.8% men, mean age 73±7 years, 213 ruptured AAAs). The SHAPFire AI incorporated 20 of 68 available features, and aneurysm size, blood pressure, and relationships between height and weight were given highest rankings. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the SHAPFire AI model displayed a significant increase in accuracy identifying ruptured AAA cases compared to the conventional model based solely on diameter with areas under the curves of 0.86±0.04 and 0.74±0.03 (P=0.008), respectively. SHAPFire AI was comparable in performance with the model using all features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study successfully developed a SHAPFire AI tool to identify AAAs at increased risk of rupture with significant higher accuracy than diameter alone. External validation of the model is warranted before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a prediction tool to identify abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) at increased risk of rupture incorporating demographic, clinical, imaging, and medication data using artificial intelligence (AI).
Design: A development and validation study for individual prognosis using AI in a case-control design.
Methods: From two Danish hospitals, all available ruptured AAA cases between January 2009 and December 2016 were included in a ratio of 1:2 with elective surgery controls. Cases with previous AAA surgery or missing pre-operative scans were excluded. Features from computed tomography angiography scans and hospital records were manually retrieved. The sample was divided randomly and evenly into developmental and internal validation groups. A SHapley Additive exPlanations Feature Importance Rank Ensembling (SHAPFire) AI tool was developed using a gradient boosting decision tree framework. The final SHAPFire AI model was compared with models using 1) solely infrarenal anterior-posterior-diameter, and 2) all available features.
Results: The study included 637 individuals (84.8% men, mean age 73±7 years, 213 ruptured AAAs). The SHAPFire AI incorporated 20 of 68 available features, and aneurysm size, blood pressure, and relationships between height and weight were given highest rankings. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the SHAPFire AI model displayed a significant increase in accuracy identifying ruptured AAA cases compared to the conventional model based solely on diameter with areas under the curves of 0.86±0.04 and 0.74±0.03 (P=0.008), respectively. SHAPFire AI was comparable in performance with the model using all features.
Conclusion: This study successfully developed a SHAPFire AI tool to identify AAAs at increased risk of rupture with significant higher accuracy than diameter alone. External validation of the model is warranted before clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.