Is vaginal repair a good option for severe cesarean scar defect? Comparison of women with or without residual myometrium.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lena Bardet, Quentin Berl, Elodie Debras, Anne-Gaelle Pourcelot, Hervé Fernandez, Perrine Capmas
{"title":"Is vaginal repair a good option for severe cesarean scar defect? Comparison of women with or without residual myometrium.","authors":"Lena Bardet, Quentin Berl, Elodie Debras, Anne-Gaelle Pourcelot, Hervé Fernandez, Perrine Capmas","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of vaginal surgery in women with moderate or severe symptomatic cesarean scar defect (with or without residual myometrium).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Gynecology department of a teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Fifty-three women, between January 2014 and December 2019, underwent vaginal surgery for symptomatic cesarean scar defect: 20 women with moderate defect (with residual myometrium) and 33 with severe defect (without residual myometrium).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Vaginal surgical approach to repair cesarean scar defect.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal surgery by comparing the myometrial residual thickness before and after surgery. The secondary objectives were evaluation of vaginal surgery efficacy on symptoms resolution, per and postoperative courses and subsequent fertility. Failure rate was evaluated as the need for a second surgery.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>After vaginal surgery, the residual myometrium significantly increased from 2.4 ± 0.9 mm to 6.6 ± 2.4 mm (p <0.01) in the moderate group and from 0 mm to 4.4 ± 2.2 mm (p <0.01) in the severe group. The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding was significantly reduced after surgery in both groups (p<0.01). Pelvic pain was significantly reduced only in the moderate group (p<0.01). The rate of complications (5 vs. 9.1%) and second surgery (15 vs. 24.2%) were not significantly different between moderate and severe groups respectively. The median time to conceive (7 months versus 12 months); pregnancy rates (84.6 vs. 68.2%); and live birth rates (76.9 vs. 50%) were not statistically significant in the moderate and severe groups respectively, with 90% of pregnancies occurring naturally. Women delivered by caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation in both groups and no uterine rupture was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the absence of residual myometrium, vaginal 65 repair of severe cesarean scar defect was effective in increasing myometrial thickness, in relieving bleeding symptoms, and in allowing to achieve pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To compare outcomes of vaginal surgery in women with moderate or severe symptomatic cesarean scar defect (with or without residual myometrium).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Gynecology department of a teaching hospital.

Patients: Fifty-three women, between January 2014 and December 2019, underwent vaginal surgery for symptomatic cesarean scar defect: 20 women with moderate defect (with residual myometrium) and 33 with severe defect (without residual myometrium).

Interventions: Vaginal surgical approach to repair cesarean scar defect.

Measurements: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal surgery by comparing the myometrial residual thickness before and after surgery. The secondary objectives were evaluation of vaginal surgery efficacy on symptoms resolution, per and postoperative courses and subsequent fertility. Failure rate was evaluated as the need for a second surgery.

Main results: After vaginal surgery, the residual myometrium significantly increased from 2.4 ± 0.9 mm to 6.6 ± 2.4 mm (p <0.01) in the moderate group and from 0 mm to 4.4 ± 2.2 mm (p <0.01) in the severe group. The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding was significantly reduced after surgery in both groups (p<0.01). Pelvic pain was significantly reduced only in the moderate group (p<0.01). The rate of complications (5 vs. 9.1%) and second surgery (15 vs. 24.2%) were not significantly different between moderate and severe groups respectively. The median time to conceive (7 months versus 12 months); pregnancy rates (84.6 vs. 68.2%); and live birth rates (76.9 vs. 50%) were not statistically significant in the moderate and severe groups respectively, with 90% of pregnancies occurring naturally. Women delivered by caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation in both groups and no uterine rupture was reported.

Conclusion: Despite the absence of residual myometrium, vaginal 65 repair of severe cesarean scar defect was effective in increasing myometrial thickness, in relieving bleeding symptoms, and in allowing to achieve pregnancy.

阴道修复是严重剖宫产瘢痕缺损的好选择吗?有或无残留子宫肌层妇女的比较。
研究目的比较中度或重度症状性剖宫产瘢痕缺损(有或无残留子宫肌层)妇女的阴道手术治疗效果:设计:回顾性队列研究:背景:一家教学医院的妇科:在2014年1月至2019年12月期间,53名妇女因症状性剖宫产瘢痕缺损接受了阴道手术:20名妇女为中度缺损(有残留子宫肌层),33名妇女为重度缺损(无残留子宫肌层):干预措施:阴道手术修复剖宫产瘢痕缺损:本研究的主要目的是通过比较手术前后的子宫肌层残留厚度来评估阴道手术的疗效。次要目标是评估阴道手术对症状缓解、术前和术后疗程以及后续生育能力的疗效。主要结果:阴道手术后,子宫肌层残留厚度明显减少:主要结果:阴道手术后,残留子宫肌层从 2.4 ± 0.9 mm 显著增至 6.6 ± 2.4 mm(P尽管没有残留子宫肌层,但通过阴道 65 修复严重剖宫产瘢痕缺损能有效增加子宫肌层厚度、缓解出血症状并实现妊娠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信