Effect of ventricular fibrillation on infarct size after myocardial infarction: a translational study

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Neven Stevic, Alexandre Pinède, Nathan Mewton, Michel Ovize, Laurent Argaud, Sandrine Lecour, Clément Boiteux, Thomas Bochaton, Martin Cour
{"title":"Effect of ventricular fibrillation on infarct size after myocardial infarction: a translational study","authors":"Neven Stevic, Alexandre Pinède, Nathan Mewton, Michel Ovize, Laurent Argaud, Sandrine Lecour, Clément Boiteux, Thomas Bochaton, Martin Cour","doi":"10.1007/s00395-024-01091-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ventricular fibrillation (VF)-induced cardiac arrest frequently complicates ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although larger infarct sizes (IS) correlate with a higher risk of VF, the influence of VF itself on IS has remained poorly investigated. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed the effect of VF on IS in patients and two experimental models. From a prospective cohort, 30 STEMI patients with VF were matched 1:2 with STEMI patients without VF on the common determinants of IS. The primary endpoint was IS, assessed using the 48-h area under the curve (AUC) for troponin. We also compared IS in pigs with/without spontaneous VF during STEMI (<i>n</i> = 15/group), and in an isolated rat heart model of myocardial infarction with/without electrically induced VF (<i>n</i> = 7/group). After matching, the patient characteristics, including the area at risk (AR), were similar. IS was 33% lower in the VF group compared to the control group (troponin AUC 1.6 [0.5–3.3] 10<sup>6</sup> arbitrary units vs. 2.4 [0.9–4.1] 10<sup>6</sup> arbitrary units; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), but infarct scar size (assessed using MRI and ECG) did not differ between the groups at 1 and 6 months. In both experimental models, IS, expressed as a percentage of AR, was lower (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) in the VF group than in the control group. When common determinants of IS are comparable, VF occurring prior to myocardial infarction reperfusion appears to be associated with smaller IS. Nevertheless, this finding, observed under specific experimental conditions and in a highly selected group of patients, was not associated with reduced infarct scar size.</p><p>Registration (HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort): ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794022.</p>","PeriodicalId":8723,"journal":{"name":"Basic Research in Cardiology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-024-01091-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ventricular fibrillation (VF)-induced cardiac arrest frequently complicates ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although larger infarct sizes (IS) correlate with a higher risk of VF, the influence of VF itself on IS has remained poorly investigated. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed the effect of VF on IS in patients and two experimental models. From a prospective cohort, 30 STEMI patients with VF were matched 1:2 with STEMI patients without VF on the common determinants of IS. The primary endpoint was IS, assessed using the 48-h area under the curve (AUC) for troponin. We also compared IS in pigs with/without spontaneous VF during STEMI (n = 15/group), and in an isolated rat heart model of myocardial infarction with/without electrically induced VF (n = 7/group). After matching, the patient characteristics, including the area at risk (AR), were similar. IS was 33% lower in the VF group compared to the control group (troponin AUC 1.6 [0.5–3.3] 106 arbitrary units vs. 2.4 [0.9–4.1] 106 arbitrary units; p < 0.05), but infarct scar size (assessed using MRI and ECG) did not differ between the groups at 1 and 6 months. In both experimental models, IS, expressed as a percentage of AR, was lower (p < 0.05) in the VF group than in the control group. When common determinants of IS are comparable, VF occurring prior to myocardial infarction reperfusion appears to be associated with smaller IS. Nevertheless, this finding, observed under specific experimental conditions and in a highly selected group of patients, was not associated with reduced infarct scar size.

Registration (HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort): ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794022.

心室颤动对心肌梗死后梗死面积的影响:一项转化研究
心室颤动(VF)引起的心脏骤停经常并发 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。虽然梗死面积(IS)越大,发生室颤的风险就越高,但室颤本身对 IS 的影响却鲜有研究。为了填补这一知识空白,我们分析了患者和两种实验模型中 VF 对 IS 的影响。在一个前瞻性队列中,30 名有 VF 的 STEMI 患者与没有 VF 的 STEMI 患者就 IS 的共同决定因素进行了 1:2 匹配。主要终点是IS,使用肌钙蛋白的48小时曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。我们还比较了 STEMI 期间有/无自发 VF 的猪(n = 15/组)和有/无电诱导 VF 的离体大鼠心肌梗死模型(n = 7/组)的 IS 情况。配对后,患者特征(包括危险区域(AR))相似。心房颤动组的 IS 比对照组低 33%(肌钙蛋白 AUC 1.6 [0.5-3.3] 106 个任意单位 vs. 2.4 [0.9-4.1] 106 个任意单位;p < 0.05),但心肌梗死瘢痕大小(通过核磁共振成像和心电图评估)在 1 个月和 6 个月时在两组之间没有差异。在两种实验模型中,以 AR 百分比表示的 IS 在 VF 组均低于对照组(p < 0.05)。当 IS 的共同决定因素具有可比性时,心肌梗死再灌注前发生的 VF 似乎与较小的 IS 有关。然而,这一发现是在特定的实验条件下、在经过严格筛选的患者群体中观察到的,与心肌梗死瘢痕缩小无关:注册(HIBISCUS-STEMI 队列):ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic Research in Cardiology
Basic Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic Research in Cardiology is an international journal for cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles related to experimental cardiology that meet its stringent scientific standards. Basic Research in Cardiology regularly receives articles from the fields of - Molecular and Cellular Biology - Biochemistry - Biophysics - Pharmacology - Physiology and Pathology - Clinical Cardiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信