Confirming non-endemicity of podoconiosis in Guatemala and in Idukki District in Kerala (India): a comparison of two approaches potentially suitable for other neglected tropical diseases.

Hope Simpson, Mei Trueba, Renata Mendizábal-Cabrera, Sobha George, Chitra Tomy, Silpa T Sasi, Aran Kartal, Kebede Deribe, Kottarathil Narayanpillai Parameswara Panicker, Gail Davey
{"title":"Confirming non-endemicity of podoconiosis in Guatemala and in Idukki District in Kerala (India): a comparison of two approaches potentially suitable for other neglected tropical diseases.","authors":"Hope Simpson, Mei Trueba, Renata Mendizábal-Cabrera, Sobha George, Chitra Tomy, Silpa T Sasi, Aran Kartal, Kebede Deribe, Kottarathil Narayanpillai Parameswara Panicker, Gail Davey","doi":"10.1186/s44263-024-00104-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Podoconiosis is an underreported lymphoedema whose distribution is uncertain at global level and within endemic countries. Previous work has identified countries with historical evidence of podoconiosis, but which do not currently report cases. Podoconiosis may persist in these countries or have been eliminated due to socioeconomic development. Here we describe two different approaches used to clarify podoconiosis endemicity status in Guatemala and in Idukki District (Kerala State, India).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different epidemiological approaches were used by different research teams, determined by the available resources and contextual factors in the two settings. In Guatemala, where lymphoedema cases are routinely recorded in the health information system, 102 municipalities with suspected cases, historical evidence of podoconiosis, high poverty rates, or environmental suitability for the disease were visited. Active case searches were conducted from July 2016 to October 2018, and suspected cases were clinically examined to confirm or rule out podoconiosis. In Idukki, where lymphoedema cases were not routinely recorded, a population-based prevalence survey for lymphoedema was conducted from September to December 2022, covering 13,664 individuals aged 15 years and older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both approaches were effective at clarifying podoconiosis endemicity. In Guatemala, 20 cases with lower limb swelling were investigated. Podoconiosis was ruled out in all cases, and filarial lymphoedema was suspected in three. In Idukki District, 105 cases of lower limb swelling were identified. None was confirmed to have podoconiosis, with post-surgical lymphoedema and hypertension being the most common diagnoses. Active filarial infection was identified in two cases in Idukki District.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These investigations provide evidence that podoconiosis is currently non-endemic in Guatemala and in Idukki District in India. They also demonstrate that population-based surveys and targeted case searches both provide effective ways to explore disease endemicity in areas where this is uncertain. The most appropriate approach depends on a combination of contextual and research-based factors, including evidence for endemicity, resources available, and geographical, population, and health system factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"2 ","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00104-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Podoconiosis is an underreported lymphoedema whose distribution is uncertain at global level and within endemic countries. Previous work has identified countries with historical evidence of podoconiosis, but which do not currently report cases. Podoconiosis may persist in these countries or have been eliminated due to socioeconomic development. Here we describe two different approaches used to clarify podoconiosis endemicity status in Guatemala and in Idukki District (Kerala State, India).

Methods: Two different epidemiological approaches were used by different research teams, determined by the available resources and contextual factors in the two settings. In Guatemala, where lymphoedema cases are routinely recorded in the health information system, 102 municipalities with suspected cases, historical evidence of podoconiosis, high poverty rates, or environmental suitability for the disease were visited. Active case searches were conducted from July 2016 to October 2018, and suspected cases were clinically examined to confirm or rule out podoconiosis. In Idukki, where lymphoedema cases were not routinely recorded, a population-based prevalence survey for lymphoedema was conducted from September to December 2022, covering 13,664 individuals aged 15 years and older.

Results: Both approaches were effective at clarifying podoconiosis endemicity. In Guatemala, 20 cases with lower limb swelling were investigated. Podoconiosis was ruled out in all cases, and filarial lymphoedema was suspected in three. In Idukki District, 105 cases of lower limb swelling were identified. None was confirmed to have podoconiosis, with post-surgical lymphoedema and hypertension being the most common diagnoses. Active filarial infection was identified in two cases in Idukki District.

Conclusions: These investigations provide evidence that podoconiosis is currently non-endemic in Guatemala and in Idukki District in India. They also demonstrate that population-based surveys and targeted case searches both provide effective ways to explore disease endemicity in areas where this is uncertain. The most appropriate approach depends on a combination of contextual and research-based factors, including evidence for endemicity, resources available, and geographical, population, and health system factors.

确认危地马拉和印度喀拉拉邦 Idukki 地区的足癣非地方病:比较两种可能适用于其他被忽视热带疾病的方法。
背景:足癣是一种未得到充分报道的淋巴水肿,其在全球和流行国家内的分布情况并不确定。以前的工作已经确定了一些国家,这些国家历史上曾有过足癣病例,但目前没有报告病例。足癣可能在这些国家持续存在,也可能因社会经济发展而被消除。在此,我们介绍了危地马拉和印度喀拉拉邦 Idukki 地区用于明确足尘病流行状况的两种不同方法:方法:不同的研究小组采用了两种不同的流行病学方法,这是由两个地区的可用资源和环境因素决定的。在危地马拉,淋巴水肿病例被例行记录在卫生信息系统中,研究小组走访了102个有疑似病例、有脚气病历史证据、贫困率高或环境适合患病的城市。从 2016 年 7 月至 2018 年 10 月进行了积极的病例搜索,并对疑似病例进行了临床检查,以确认或排除足癣。在没有常规记录淋巴水肿病例的伊杜克基,于2022年9月至12月开展了基于人群的淋巴水肿患病率调查,覆盖了13664名15岁及以上人群:这两种方法都能有效查明足癣的流行情况。在危地马拉,对 20 例下肢浮肿病例进行了调查。所有病例都排除了足癣的可能性,有 3 例怀疑是丝虫性淋巴水肿。在伊杜克基区,共发现 105 例下肢浮肿病例。没有一例被确诊为足癣,最常见的诊断是手术后淋巴水肿和高血压。在伊杜克基区的两个病例中发现了活动性丝虫感染:这些调查提供了证据,证明足癣目前在危地马拉和印度伊杜克基地区没有流行。这些调查还表明,基于人口的调查和有针对性的病例搜索都是在不确定的地区探索疾病流行情况的有效方法。最合适的方法取决于各种背景因素和研究因素,包括地方病流行的证据、可用资源以及地理、人口和卫生系统因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信