Associations between Physical Performance Tests with Cognitive Changes: The Moderating Effect of Cognitive Status.

Zhi Hao Lim, Junhong Yu, Sangita Kuparasundram, Rathi Mahendran, Ted Kheng Siang Ng
{"title":"Associations between Physical Performance Tests with Cognitive Changes: The Moderating Effect of Cognitive Status.","authors":"Zhi Hao Lim, Junhong Yu, Sangita Kuparasundram, Rathi Mahendran, Ted Kheng Siang Ng","doi":"10.2174/0115672050342857241025091918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Age-related cognitive decline has been linked with risk factors, including physical performance. Prior studies investigating such associations were typically conducted in clinical settings within Western populations with a frequent focus on late neurocognitive diagnostic stages (i.e., Alzheimer's disease), reducing their generalizability to the Asian population and early neurocognitive stages. To address these knowledge gaps, our study investigated longitudinal associations between physical performance measures at baseline and cognitive change in global cognition, executive functioning (EF) based and non-executive functioning (non- EF) based cognitive domains within the Singaporean population. The moderating role of early neurocognitive status, namely mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN), was also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper examined data from 347 participants (CN = 284; MCI = 63) who participated in the Community Health and Intergenerational (CHI) study at baseline and follow-up. Data from a neurocognitive battery and three physical performance tests, namely the timed-up and go (TUG), fast gait speed (FGS) and 30-second chair-stand test (30s-CST), were analysed using multivariate linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one significant association between FGS scores and cognitive change in Semantic Fluency was observed; other associations were not significant. Cognitive status also significantly moderated associations between TUG/30s-CST tasks with several neurocognitive tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of significant longitudinal associations between baseline physical performance measures and cognitive change differed from findings in the literature. Nevertheless, the moderating role of cognitive status further highlighted the need to account for cognitive status when exploring such associations within a heterogeneous group of older adults without dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050342857241025091918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objective: Age-related cognitive decline has been linked with risk factors, including physical performance. Prior studies investigating such associations were typically conducted in clinical settings within Western populations with a frequent focus on late neurocognitive diagnostic stages (i.e., Alzheimer's disease), reducing their generalizability to the Asian population and early neurocognitive stages. To address these knowledge gaps, our study investigated longitudinal associations between physical performance measures at baseline and cognitive change in global cognition, executive functioning (EF) based and non-executive functioning (non- EF) based cognitive domains within the Singaporean population. The moderating role of early neurocognitive status, namely mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN), was also examined.

Methods: This paper examined data from 347 participants (CN = 284; MCI = 63) who participated in the Community Health and Intergenerational (CHI) study at baseline and follow-up. Data from a neurocognitive battery and three physical performance tests, namely the timed-up and go (TUG), fast gait speed (FGS) and 30-second chair-stand test (30s-CST), were analysed using multivariate linear regression models.

Results: Only one significant association between FGS scores and cognitive change in Semantic Fluency was observed; other associations were not significant. Cognitive status also significantly moderated associations between TUG/30s-CST tasks with several neurocognitive tests.

Conclusion: The lack of significant longitudinal associations between baseline physical performance measures and cognitive change differed from findings in the literature. Nevertheless, the moderating role of cognitive status further highlighted the need to account for cognitive status when exploring such associations within a heterogeneous group of older adults without dementia.

体能测试与认知变化之间的关联:认知状态的调节作用
导言/目的:与年龄相关的认知能力下降与包括身体表现在内的风险因素有关。之前调查这种关联的研究通常是在西方人群的临床环境中进行的,重点通常放在神经认知诊断的晚期阶段(即阿尔茨海默病),这降低了它们对亚洲人群和神经认知早期阶段的普适性。为了填补这些知识空白,我们的研究调查了新加坡人群在基线时的体能测量与认知变化之间的纵向联系,包括总体认知、以执行功能(EF)为基础的认知领域和以非执行功能(EF)为基础的认知领域。本文还研究了早期神经认知状态(即轻度认知障碍(MCI)和认知正常(CN))的调节作用:本文研究了参加社区健康与代际(CHI)研究的 347 名参与者(CN = 284;MCI = 63)的基线和随访数据。采用多变量线性回归模型分析了神经认知测试和三项体能测试的数据,即定时起立行走(TUG)、快速步速(FGS)和30秒椅子站立测试(30s-CST):结果:仅观察到 FGS 评分与语义流畅性认知变化之间存在一种明显的关联,其他关联均不明显。认知状况也在很大程度上调节了 TUG/30s-CST 任务与几项神经认知测试之间的关联:基线体能表现测量与认知变化之间缺乏明显的纵向联系,这与文献研究结果不同。尽管如此,认知状况的调节作用进一步强调了在没有痴呆症的异质性老年人群体中探讨此类关联时考虑认知状况的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信