Is anterior fusion still necessary in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrey Grin, Vasily Karanadze, Ivan Lvov, Aleksandr Talypov, Anton Kordonskiy, Rinat Abdrafiev
{"title":"Is anterior fusion still necessary in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrey Grin, Vasily Karanadze, Ivan Lvov, Aleksandr Talypov, Anton Kordonskiy, Rinat Abdrafiev","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate and compare radiological indicators, as well as short-term and long-term outcomes, in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBF) who underwent anterior fusion, combined anterior-posterior procedure, or short-segment pedicle screw fixation (PSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Inclusion criteria comprised articles published between 2004 and 2023, full-text availability in English, burst fractures without spinal cord or nerve root injuries at admission, short-segment PSF without fusion, anterior or combined fusion methods, patients aged 18 or older, and a minimum 12-month follow-up. Meta-analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Using a single-arm meta-analysis method, pooled indicators of short- and long-term outcomes for each studied group were determined. The obtained data were then compared using simple comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled mean Cobb angle at admission for the anterior, combined, and PSF groups was 18.2° (95% CI, 14.6-21.8), 11.7° (95% CI, 9.7-13.5), and 17.1° (95% CI, 15.1-19.1), respectively. Anterior fusion achieved a greater degree of kyphosis correction across all groups, but only the combined group showed a nonsignificant loss of correction after discharge (SMD = 0.809 [95% CI, 0.270, 1.348]). The anterior vertebral body compression rate at admission was 55.2% (95% CI, 46.3-64.0) in the combined group and 37.8% (95% CI, 33.7-41.9) in the PSF group. Operative time, blood loss, and hospitalization duration were lowest in the percutaneous PSF group, with means of 96.5 min (95% CI, 82.4-110.6), 83.8 ml (95% CI, 71.7-95.9), and 6.6 days (95% CI, 4.7-8.5), respectively. All techniques demonstrated a similar incidence of deep wound infections and implant-related complications. The pooled Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were 17.2 (95% CI, 10.4-23.9) for the anterior group, 15.4 (95% CI, 11.5-19.3) for the combined group, and 13.4 (95% CI, 10.4-16.3) for the PSF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, with a kyphotic angle of less than 19.1° and an anterior vertebral body compression rate of less than 41.9%, short-segment pedicle screw fixation without fusion may be preferable option due to reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation duration, shorter hospital stay, and better ODI scores at final follow-up. Routine anterior fusion has demonstrated high potential for kyphosis correction. The loss of the Cobb angle from surgery to final follow-up was nonsignificant only in patients who underwent combined surgery. When determining the surgical approach, surgeons should carefully weigh the advantages of anterior and combined fusion against the significantly higher surgical trauma compared to standard PSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucie.2024.11.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate and compare radiological indicators, as well as short-term and long-term outcomes, in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBF) who underwent anterior fusion, combined anterior-posterior procedure, or short-segment pedicle screw fixation (PSF).

Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Inclusion criteria comprised articles published between 2004 and 2023, full-text availability in English, burst fractures without spinal cord or nerve root injuries at admission, short-segment PSF without fusion, anterior or combined fusion methods, patients aged 18 or older, and a minimum 12-month follow-up. Meta-analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Using a single-arm meta-analysis method, pooled indicators of short- and long-term outcomes for each studied group were determined. The obtained data were then compared using simple comparison.

Results: The pooled mean Cobb angle at admission for the anterior, combined, and PSF groups was 18.2° (95% CI, 14.6-21.8), 11.7° (95% CI, 9.7-13.5), and 17.1° (95% CI, 15.1-19.1), respectively. Anterior fusion achieved a greater degree of kyphosis correction across all groups, but only the combined group showed a nonsignificant loss of correction after discharge (SMD = 0.809 [95% CI, 0.270, 1.348]). The anterior vertebral body compression rate at admission was 55.2% (95% CI, 46.3-64.0) in the combined group and 37.8% (95% CI, 33.7-41.9) in the PSF group. Operative time, blood loss, and hospitalization duration were lowest in the percutaneous PSF group, with means of 96.5 min (95% CI, 82.4-110.6), 83.8 ml (95% CI, 71.7-95.9), and 6.6 days (95% CI, 4.7-8.5), respectively. All techniques demonstrated a similar incidence of deep wound infections and implant-related complications. The pooled Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were 17.2 (95% CI, 10.4-23.9) for the anterior group, 15.4 (95% CI, 11.5-19.3) for the combined group, and 13.4 (95% CI, 10.4-16.3) for the PSF group.

Conclusions: For patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, with a kyphotic angle of less than 19.1° and an anterior vertebral body compression rate of less than 41.9%, short-segment pedicle screw fixation without fusion may be preferable option due to reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation duration, shorter hospital stay, and better ODI scores at final follow-up. Routine anterior fusion has demonstrated high potential for kyphosis correction. The loss of the Cobb angle from surgery to final follow-up was nonsignificant only in patients who underwent combined surgery. When determining the surgical approach, surgeons should carefully weigh the advantages of anterior and combined fusion against the significantly higher surgical trauma compared to standard PSF.

神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者是否仍有必要进行前路融合?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的对接受前路融合术、前后路联合术或短节段椎弓根螺钉固定术(PSF)的神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折(TLBF)患者的放射学指标以及短期和长期预后进行评估和比较:方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。纳入标准包括:2004 年至 2023 年间发表的文章、英文全文、入院时无脊髓或神经根损伤的爆裂性骨折、无融合的短段椎弓根螺钉固定术、前路或联合融合方法、18 岁或以上的患者以及至少 12 个月的随访。荟萃分析采用综合荟萃分析软件进行。采用单臂荟萃分析方法,确定了每个研究组的短期和长期疗效的汇总指标。然后使用简单比较法对获得的数据进行比较:结果:前路融合组、联合融合组和 PSF 组入院时的汇总平均 Cobb 角分别为 18.2 °(95% CI,14.6-21.8)、11.7 °(95% CI,9.7-13.5)和 17.1 °(95% CI,15.1-19.1)。前路椎体融合术在所有组别中都实现了更大程度的椎体后凸矫正,但只有联合组在出院后出现了不明显的矫正损失(SMD = 0.809 [95% CI, 0.270, 1.348])。联合组入院时的椎体前部压迫率为 55.2%(95% CI,46.3-64.0),PSF 组为 37.8%(95% CI,33.7-41.9)。经皮 PSF 组的手术时间、失血量和住院时间最少,平均分别为 96.5 分钟(95% CI,82.4-110.6)、83.8 毫升(95% CI,71.7-95.9)和 6.6 天(95% CI,4.7-8.5)。所有技术的深部伤口感染和植入相关并发症发生率相似。前路组的汇总奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)评分为17.2(95% CI,10.4-23.9),联合组为15.4(95% CI,11.5-19.3),PSF组为13.4(95% CI,10.4-16.3):结论:对于椎体后倾角小于19.1°、椎体前方压缩率小于41.9%、神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者来说,不进行融合的短节段椎弓根螺钉固定可能是更好的选择,因为它能减少术中失血、缩短手术时间、缩短住院时间,并在最终随访时获得更好的ODI评分。常规的前路融合术在矫正脊柱后凸方面具有很高的潜力。只有在接受联合手术的患者中,从手术到最终随访期间的Cobb角损失并不明显。在确定手术方法时,外科医生应仔细权衡前路融合术和联合融合术的优势与明显高于标准 PSF 的手术创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信