Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Catherine Riffin, Jennifer L Wolff, Karl A Pillemer
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care.","authors":"Catherine Riffin, Jennifer L Wolff, Karl A Pillemer","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family caregivers serve vital functions in older adults' health care, but their own needs are not systematically assessed in routine care delivery. The present study employed a user-centered approach to develop and evaluate a pragmatic checklist to support proactive identification and discussion of caregivers' concerns in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Checklist development proceeded according to a preestablished methodology involving domain identification, item generation, overall construction, and revision. The checklist subsequently underwent formal evaluation by 25 subject matter experts (SMEs), including primary care clinicians, family caregivers, and health services researchers who assessed the checklist's content validity and appraised its overall utility, ease of use, and mode of administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The checklist showed excellent content validity. None of the items were found to be superfluous, indicating that the checklist covered relevant content domains. Subject matter experts reported that the checklist was easy to use, just the right length, and would be helpful in identifying and prompting a discussion about caregivers' needs. Their preferences regarding how the checklist should be administered were variable. Minor revisions to the checklist focused on enhancing its applicability to caregivers from low- and middle-income families and those from underrepresented backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results indicate that the checklist is an appropriate tool for identifying caregivers' needs and concerns. Findings lay the groundwork for pilot testing in primary care to confirm the checklist's clinical feasibility and evaluate its preliminary impact on family-centered care quality and outcomes for primary care clinics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family caregivers serve vital functions in older adults' health care, but their own needs are not systematically assessed in routine care delivery. The present study employed a user-centered approach to develop and evaluate a pragmatic checklist to support proactive identification and discussion of caregivers' concerns in primary care.

Method: Checklist development proceeded according to a preestablished methodology involving domain identification, item generation, overall construction, and revision. The checklist subsequently underwent formal evaluation by 25 subject matter experts (SMEs), including primary care clinicians, family caregivers, and health services researchers who assessed the checklist's content validity and appraised its overall utility, ease of use, and mode of administration.

Results: The checklist showed excellent content validity. None of the items were found to be superfluous, indicating that the checklist covered relevant content domains. Subject matter experts reported that the checklist was easy to use, just the right length, and would be helpful in identifying and prompting a discussion about caregivers' needs. Their preferences regarding how the checklist should be administered were variable. Minor revisions to the checklist focused on enhancing its applicability to caregivers from low- and middle-income families and those from underrepresented backgrounds.

Discussion: Results indicate that the checklist is an appropriate tool for identifying caregivers' needs and concerns. Findings lay the groundwork for pilot testing in primary care to confirm the checklist's clinical feasibility and evaluate its preliminary impact on family-centered care quality and outcomes for primary care clinics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

开发和评估用于初级保健的护理人员核对表。
介绍:家庭护理人员在老年人的医疗保健中发挥着重要作用,但在日常护理工作中却没有对他们的需求进行系统评估。本研究采用以用户为中心的方法,开发并评估了一份实用的核对表,以支持在初级保健中主动识别和讨论照顾者的关注点:方法:核对表的开发按照预先确定的方法进行,包括领域识别、项目生成、整体构建和修订。随后,25 位主题专家(SMEs)对核对表进行了正式评估,其中包括初级保健临床医生、家庭护理人员和健康服务研究人员,他们评估了核对表的内容有效性,并对其整体实用性、易用性和管理模式进行了评价:结果:核对表显示出极好的内容有效性。没有发现任何一个项目是多余的,这表明核对表涵盖了相关的内容领域。主题专家表示,该核对表易于使用,长度恰到好处,有助于识别和引发有关护理人员需求的讨论。他们对如何使用核对表的偏好各不相同。对核对表的小幅修改主要集中在增强其对来自中低收入家庭和来自代表性不足背景的照顾者的适用性上:讨论:结果表明,核对表是确定照顾者需求和关注点的合适工具。研究结果为在初级保健中进行试点测试奠定了基础,以确认核对表的临床可行性,并评估其对初级保健诊所以家庭为中心的保健质量和结果的初步影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信