Predicting higher-risk growth patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma with multiphase multidetector computed tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET radiomics.
IF 1.3 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Predicting higher-risk growth patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma with multiphase multidetector computed tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET radiomics.","authors":"Yi Luo, Xiaoguang Li, Jinju Sun, Suihan Liu, Peng Zhong, Huan Liu, Xiao Chen, Jingqin Fang","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a predictive model for identifying the higher-risk growth pattern of invasive lung adenocarcinoma using multiphase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET radiomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 203 patients with confirmed invasive lung adenocarcinoma between January 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 143) and testing sets (n = 60). Patients were classified into two groups according to the predominant growth pattern (lower-risk group: lepidic/acinar; higher-risk group: papillary/solid/micropapillary). Preoperative multiphase MDCT and 18F-FDG PET images were evaluated. The Artificial Intelligence Kit software was used to extract radiomic features. Five predictive models [arterial phase, venous phase, and plain scan (AVP), PET, AVP-PET, clinical, and radiomic-clinical (Rad-Clin) combined model] were developed. The models' performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared using the DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the radiomics models (AVP, PET, and AVP-PET), the AVP-PET model [area under ROC curve (AUC) = 0.888] outperformed the PET model (AUC = 0.814; P = 0.015) in predicting the higher-risk growth patterns. The combined Rad-Clin model (AUC = 0.923), which integrates AVP-PET radiomics and five independent clinical predictors (gender, spiculation, long-axis diameter, maximum standardized uptake value, and average standardized uptake value), exhibited superior performance in predicting the higher-risk growth pattern compared with radiomic models (P = 0.043, vs. AVP-PET; P = 0.016, vs. AVP; P = 0.002, vs. PET) or the clinical model alone (constructing based on five clinical predictors; AUC = 0.793; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined Rad-Clin model can predict the higher-risk growth patterns of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). This approach could help determine individual therapeutic strategies for IAC patients by distinguishing predominant growth patterns with high risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a predictive model for identifying the higher-risk growth pattern of invasive lung adenocarcinoma using multiphase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET radiomics.
Methods: A total of 203 patients with confirmed invasive lung adenocarcinoma between January 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 143) and testing sets (n = 60). Patients were classified into two groups according to the predominant growth pattern (lower-risk group: lepidic/acinar; higher-risk group: papillary/solid/micropapillary). Preoperative multiphase MDCT and 18F-FDG PET images were evaluated. The Artificial Intelligence Kit software was used to extract radiomic features. Five predictive models [arterial phase, venous phase, and plain scan (AVP), PET, AVP-PET, clinical, and radiomic-clinical (Rad-Clin) combined model] were developed. The models' performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared using the DeLong test.
Results: Among the radiomics models (AVP, PET, and AVP-PET), the AVP-PET model [area under ROC curve (AUC) = 0.888] outperformed the PET model (AUC = 0.814; P = 0.015) in predicting the higher-risk growth patterns. The combined Rad-Clin model (AUC = 0.923), which integrates AVP-PET radiomics and five independent clinical predictors (gender, spiculation, long-axis diameter, maximum standardized uptake value, and average standardized uptake value), exhibited superior performance in predicting the higher-risk growth pattern compared with radiomic models (P = 0.043, vs. AVP-PET; P = 0.016, vs. AVP; P = 0.002, vs. PET) or the clinical model alone (constructing based on five clinical predictors; AUC = 0.793; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The combined Rad-Clin model can predict the higher-risk growth patterns of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). This approach could help determine individual therapeutic strategies for IAC patients by distinguishing predominant growth patterns with high risk.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.