A mobile app to support self-management and remotely monitor disease impact in rheumatoid arthritis: the randomised controlled AEGORA trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Michaël Doumen, Elias De Meyst, Delphine Bertrand, Sofia Pazmino, Marine Piessens, Johan Joly, Mieke Devinck, René Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren
{"title":"A mobile app to support self-management and remotely monitor disease impact in rheumatoid arthritis: the randomised controlled AEGORA trial.","authors":"Michaël Doumen, Elias De Meyst, Delphine Bertrand, Sofia Pazmino, Marine Piessens, Johan Joly, Mieke Devinck, René Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study if smartphone applications could support the self-management of RA, while investigating engagement and potential negative psychological effects with app-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>App-based Education and GOal-setting in RA (AEGORA) was a multicentre randomised controlled trial with 2:1:1-allocation to usual care or two versions of an app-based self-management intervention for RA. The 16-week programme involved patient education, goal-setting, and remote monitoring of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) instrument, either weekly or monthly depending on randomisation. The primary end point was improvement in the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) after 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included non-inferiority regarding the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and superiority regarding patient-reported physical activity, sleep quality and RAID. App engagement and RAID-scores were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 122 patients were included: mean (SD) disease duration 12 (9) years, mean (SD) age 58(11), 68% female, mean (SD) DAS28-CRP 2.4(0.9). The intervention did not improve the ASES-score over usual care (β: 0.44, p= 0.87). Non-inferiority was established for the PCS (β -0.95 [95% CI -3.30 to + 1.40] favouring the intervention). Other predefined outcomes did not differ. App retention steadily declined to 43% by 16 weeks. Although the RAID remained stable over time overall, 35% of app users reported ≥1 episode of clinically relevant worsening over 16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This app-based self-management intervention was not superior to usual care regarding self-efficacy improvement. However, remote symptom monitoring provided valuable insight and did not increase pain catastrophising, alleviating concerns regarding the psychological impact of remote monitoring with apps.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05888181.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to study if smartphone applications could support the self-management of RA, while investigating engagement and potential negative psychological effects with app-use.

Methods: App-based Education and GOal-setting in RA (AEGORA) was a multicentre randomised controlled trial with 2:1:1-allocation to usual care or two versions of an app-based self-management intervention for RA. The 16-week programme involved patient education, goal-setting, and remote monitoring of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) instrument, either weekly or monthly depending on randomisation. The primary end point was improvement in the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) after 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included non-inferiority regarding the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and superiority regarding patient-reported physical activity, sleep quality and RAID. App engagement and RAID-scores were analysed descriptively.

Results: Overall, 122 patients were included: mean (SD) disease duration 12 (9) years, mean (SD) age 58(11), 68% female, mean (SD) DAS28-CRP 2.4(0.9). The intervention did not improve the ASES-score over usual care (β: 0.44, p= 0.87). Non-inferiority was established for the PCS (β -0.95 [95% CI -3.30 to + 1.40] favouring the intervention). Other predefined outcomes did not differ. App retention steadily declined to 43% by 16 weeks. Although the RAID remained stable over time overall, 35% of app users reported ≥1 episode of clinically relevant worsening over 16 weeks.

Conclusion: This app-based self-management intervention was not superior to usual care regarding self-efficacy improvement. However, remote symptom monitoring provided valuable insight and did not increase pain catastrophising, alleviating concerns regarding the psychological impact of remote monitoring with apps.

Trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05888181.

支持类风湿关节炎患者自我管理和远程监控疾病影响的手机应用:随机对照 AEGORA 试验。
目的我们旨在研究智能手机应用程序能否支持RA的自我管理,同时调查应用程序使用的参与度和潜在的负面心理影响:基于应用程序的RA教育和目标设定(AEGORA)是一项多中心随机对照试验,2:1:1分配给常规护理或两种基于应用程序的RA自我管理干预。该项目为期16周,内容包括患者教育、目标设定和类风湿关节炎疾病影响(RAID)工具的远程监测,根据随机分配情况,每周或每月进行一次监测。主要终点是16周后关节炎自我效能量表(ASES)的改善情况。次要终点包括疼痛加重量表(PCS)的非劣效性,以及患者报告的体力活动、睡眠质量和 RAID 的优效性。对应用程序参与度和 RAID 评分进行了描述性分析:共纳入 122 名患者:平均(标清)病程 12(9)年,平均(标清)年龄 58(11)岁,68% 为女性,平均(标清)DAS28-CRP 2.4(0.9)。与常规治疗相比,干预并未改善ASES评分(β:0.44,p= 0.87)。PCS的非劣效性成立(β -0.95 [95% CI -3.30 to + 1.40] 倾向于干预)。其他预定义结果没有差异。到 16 周时,应用程序保留率稳步下降至 43%。虽然RAID总体上保持稳定,但在16周内,35%的应用程序用户报告了≥1次临床相关的病情恶化:结论:在自我效能改善方面,这种基于应用程序的自我管理干预并不优于常规护理。然而,远程症状监测提供了有价值的洞察力,并没有增加疼痛灾难化,减轻了人们对使用应用程序进行远程监测的心理影响的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信