Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jason McMullan, B Woods Curry, Dustin Calhoun, Frank Forde, J Jordan Gray, Thomas Lardaro, Ashley Larrimore, Dustin LeBlanc, James Li, Sean Morgan, Matthew Neth, Woodrow Sams, John Lyng
{"title":"Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.","authors":"Jason McMullan, B Woods Curry, Dustin Calhoun, Frank Forde, J Jordan Gray, Thomas Lardaro, Ashley Larrimore, Dustin LeBlanc, James Li, Sean Morgan, Matthew Neth, Woodrow Sams, John Lyng","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommends:Isotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable. • Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.• Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.• A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommends:Isotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable. • Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.• Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.• A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.

院前创伤简编:创伤中的液体复苏 - NAEMSP 的立场声明和资源文件。
院前创伤护理中的液体复苏选择非常有限,大多数紧急医疗服务 (EMS) 机构只能使用晶体液。使用哪种溶液、输多少以及判断输液或不输液的个体风险和益处仍是一个不确定的领域。为了解决晶体液在院前创伤护理中的作用问题,我们回顾了现有的相关文献,并提出了指导临床护理的建议。有关院前血液制品管理的内容已在其他章节中介绍。NAEMSP 建议:院前创伤救治中应首选等渗晶体液。对于无创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的患者,允许低血压是合理的。对于有创伤性脑损伤的多发性创伤患者,避免或纠正低血压可能比限制液体使用更重要。一般情况下,应避免大容量晶体液复苏。- 应权衡在创伤复苏中使用或限制静脉输液的风险和可能带来的益处。 - 应考虑减少静脉输液需求的策略。 - 应为院前医疗人员制定标准的创伤复苏课程,以改善创伤中静脉输液的循证管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信