High-dose Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ka Man Fong, George Wing Yiu Ng, Anne Kit Hung Leung, Kang Yiu Lai
{"title":"High-dose Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Ka Man Fong, George Wing Yiu Ng, Anne Kit Hung Leung, Kang Yiu Lai","doi":"10.1177/08850666241299391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current therapies for severe COVID-19, such as steroids and immunomodulators are associated with various side effects. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy with minimal side effects for patients with cytokine storm due to COVID-19. However, evidence supporting high-dose intravenous NAC in severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 who were admitted for acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300) with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Queen Elizabeth Hospital from fifth July 2020 to 31<sup>st</sup> October 2022. Inclusion was limited to patients who required mechanical ventilation. High-dose NAC refers to a dosage of 10 g per day. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days. Propensity-score matched analysis using logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 136 patients analyzed, 42 (40.3%) patients received NAC. The unmatched NAC patients displayed a higher day-28 mortality (12 (28.6%) versus 4 (6.5%), p = 0.005) and fewer ventilator-free days (18.5 (0-23.0) versus 22.0 (18.3-24.0), p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed in ICU and hospital length of stays among survivors. In patients who were not treated with tocilizumab, those receiving NAC exhibited a trend toward a quicker reduction in C-reactive protein compared to those who did not receive NAC.After propensity score matching which included 64 patients with 33 (51.6%) receiving NAC, no significant differences were found in 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU and hospital length of stay. After adjusting for potential confounders, logistic regression of the propensity score-matched population did not demonstrate that the use of NAC independently affected 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving standard COVID-19 treatment, the addition of high-dose NAC did not lead to improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241299391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241299391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current therapies for severe COVID-19, such as steroids and immunomodulators are associated with various side effects. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy with minimal side effects for patients with cytokine storm due to COVID-19. However, evidence supporting high-dose intravenous NAC in severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation is limited.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 who were admitted for acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300) with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Queen Elizabeth Hospital from fifth July 2020 to 31st October 2022. Inclusion was limited to patients who required mechanical ventilation. High-dose NAC refers to a dosage of 10 g per day. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days. Propensity-score matched analysis using logistic regression was performed.

Results: Among the 136 patients analyzed, 42 (40.3%) patients received NAC. The unmatched NAC patients displayed a higher day-28 mortality (12 (28.6%) versus 4 (6.5%), p = 0.005) and fewer ventilator-free days (18.5 (0-23.0) versus 22.0 (18.3-24.0), p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed in ICU and hospital length of stays among survivors. In patients who were not treated with tocilizumab, those receiving NAC exhibited a trend toward a quicker reduction in C-reactive protein compared to those who did not receive NAC.After propensity score matching which included 64 patients with 33 (51.6%) receiving NAC, no significant differences were found in 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU and hospital length of stay. After adjusting for potential confounders, logistic regression of the propensity score-matched population did not demonstrate that the use of NAC independently affected 28-day mortality.

Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving standard COVID-19 treatment, the addition of high-dose NAC did not lead to improved clinical outcomes.

在 COVID-19 肺炎机械通气患者中静脉注射大剂量 N-乙酰半胱氨酸:倾向分数匹配队列研究》。
背景:目前治疗严重 COVID-19 的疗法,如类固醇和免疫调节剂,都会产生各种副作用。N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)已成为一种潜在的辅助疗法,对 COVID-19 引起的细胞因子风暴患者的副作用极小。然而,在需要机械通气的重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者中,支持大剂量静脉注射 NAC 的证据非常有限:我们对因急性呼吸衰竭(PaO2/FiO2 比值为 2022 年 10 月前)入院的年龄≥ 18 岁的连续患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入对象仅限于需要机械通气的患者。大剂量 NAC 指的是每天 10 克的剂量。主要研究结果为 28 天内的全因死亡率。采用逻辑回归进行倾向分数匹配分析:在分析的 136 例患者中,42 例(40.3%)接受了 NAC 治疗。未匹配的 NAC 患者在 28 天内的死亡率较高(12 (28.6%) 对 4 (6.5%),p = 0.005),无呼吸机天数较少(18.5 (0-23.0) 对 22.0 (18.3-24.0),p = 0.015)。幸存者的重症监护室和住院时间没有明显差异。在未接受托西珠单抗治疗的患者中,与未接受 NAC 治疗的患者相比,接受 NAC 治疗的患者的 C 反应蛋白有更快下降的趋势。经过倾向评分匹配(包括 64 例患者,其中 33 例(51.6%)接受 NAC 治疗)后,在 28 天死亡率、无呼吸机天数、ICU 和住院时间方面未发现显著差异。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,倾向得分匹配人群的逻辑回归结果显示,NAC的使用并不会独立影响28天的死亡率:结论:对于需要机械通气并接受标准 COVID-19 治疗的 COVID-19 肺炎患者,添加大剂量 NAC 并不能改善临床预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信