Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jinqiang Zhu, Dunhu Han, Yuanyuan Sun, Chunzeng Zhao
{"title":"Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis.","authors":"Jinqiang Zhu, Dunhu Han, Yuanyuan Sun, Chunzeng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long bone fractures may exhibit nonunion/delayed union and the precise mechanism underlying this devastating condition remain unknown. More recently, a series of meta-analyses have examined the effect of local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients suffering from nonunion/delayed union fractures; however, the conclusions of available meta-analyses have remained debatable. This umbrella meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and recalculate available evidence to assess the certainty of the effect of PRP on nonunion/delayed union fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant meta-analyses and individual studies investigating the effect of PRP therapy on nonunion/delayed union fractures were obtained through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus up to November 2023. Meta-analyses were re-conducted for healing rate and healing time using a random effects model. The methodology quality of the included meta-analyses and the quality of evidence was assessed using the AMSTAR2 and GRADE criteria, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 meta-analyses with 13 individual studies, comprising 1362 patients, were included. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in both healing rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.60) and healing time (mean difference (MD): -1.25, 95 % CI: -2.09 to -0.42) of nonunion/delayed union fractures. However, when individual studies were pooled, PRP was not effective in increasing the healing rate, while it was effective in reducing healing time (MD = -2.15, 95 % CI = -3.17 to -1.13). PRP therapy had no significant effect on pain improvement and the Excellent/Good Posttreatment Limb Function. The risk of the adverse side effects was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella meta-analysis revealed that PRP may reduce healing time in patients with nonunion/delayed union fractures, with no potential side effects. This finding is needed to be confirmed by further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long bone fractures may exhibit nonunion/delayed union and the precise mechanism underlying this devastating condition remain unknown. More recently, a series of meta-analyses have examined the effect of local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients suffering from nonunion/delayed union fractures; however, the conclusions of available meta-analyses have remained debatable. This umbrella meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and recalculate available evidence to assess the certainty of the effect of PRP on nonunion/delayed union fractures.

Methods: Relevant meta-analyses and individual studies investigating the effect of PRP therapy on nonunion/delayed union fractures were obtained through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus up to November 2023. Meta-analyses were re-conducted for healing rate and healing time using a random effects model. The methodology quality of the included meta-analyses and the quality of evidence was assessed using the AMSTAR2 and GRADE criteria, respectively.

Results: A total of 5 meta-analyses with 13 individual studies, comprising 1362 patients, were included. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in both healing rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.60) and healing time (mean difference (MD): -1.25, 95 % CI: -2.09 to -0.42) of nonunion/delayed union fractures. However, when individual studies were pooled, PRP was not effective in increasing the healing rate, while it was effective in reducing healing time (MD = -2.15, 95 % CI = -3.17 to -1.13). PRP therapy had no significant effect on pain improvement and the Excellent/Good Posttreatment Limb Function. The risk of the adverse side effects was not significant.

Conclusion: This umbrella meta-analysis revealed that PRP may reduce healing time in patients with nonunion/delayed union fractures, with no potential side effects. This finding is needed to be confirmed by further studies.

富血小板血浆治疗延迟愈合和未愈合骨折:总括荟萃分析。
背景:长骨骨折可能会出现不愈合/延迟愈合的情况,而导致这种破坏性情况的确切机制仍不清楚。最近,一系列荟萃分析研究了局部应用富血小板血浆(PRP)对骨折不愈合/延迟愈合患者的影响;然而,现有荟萃分析的结论仍存在争议。本项总括荟萃分析旨在综合并重新计算现有证据,以评估 PRP 对未愈合/延迟愈合骨折影响的确定性:方法:通过在PubMed、Web of Knowledge和Scopus上进行系统搜索,获得了截至2023年11月调查PRP疗法对未愈合/延迟愈合骨折影响的相关荟萃分析和单项研究。采用随机效应模型对愈合率和愈合时间重新进行了元分析。纳入的荟萃分析的方法学质量和证据质量分别采用 AMSTAR2 和 GRADE 标准进行评估:结果:共纳入了 5 项荟萃分析和 13 项单项研究,包括 1362 名患者。分析结果显示,非愈合/延迟愈合骨折的愈合率(相对风险(RR)= 1.30,95%CI:1.06 至 1.60)和愈合时间(平均差(MD):-1.25,95%CI:-2.09 至 -0.42)均有明显改善。然而,将各项研究汇总后发现,PRP 并不能有效提高愈合率,却能有效缩短愈合时间(MD = -2.15,95 % CI = -3.17至-1.13)。PRP疗法对疼痛改善和治疗后肢体功能优/良没有明显影响。不良副作用的风险不显著:这项总括荟萃分析显示,PRP 可缩短骨折未愈合/延迟愈合患者的愈合时间,且无潜在副作用。这一发现还需进一步研究证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信