Impact of hepatic steatosis on liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography and its diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhiyuan Chen, Ye Huang, Yan Zhang, Dongjing Zhou, Yu Yang, Shuping Zhang, Huanming Xiao, HaiXia Li, Yupin Liu
{"title":"Impact of hepatic steatosis on liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography and its diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.","authors":"Zhiyuan Chen, Ye Huang, Yan Zhang, Dongjing Zhou, Yu Yang, Shuping Zhang, Huanming Xiao, HaiXia Li, Yupin Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01857-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the impact of hepatic steatosis measured by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) value and its diagnostic performance for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 914 patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy and MRI-PDFF were retrospectively reviewed. The influence of MRI-PDFF on LSM value was assessed using univariate and multivariate linear analyses. To assess the influence of liver steatosis on the diagnostic performance of LSM, a series of ROC analyses were performed and compared by stratifying patients into non-steatosis (PDFF < 5%) and steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%) groups according to MRI-PDFF values. The effects of different LSM cut-off values on the false-positive rate in the steatosis cohort were compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LSM values were significantly affected by MRI-PDFF in the entire cohort (B-coefficient: 0.003, p < 0.001), F1 cohort (B-coefficient: 0.005, p < 0.001), and F2 cohort (B-coefficient: 0.003, p = 0.002). Hepatic steatosis was not observed to have a significant influence on the ROC curve of LSM for staging liver fibrosis. Compared with using the cut-off values for the CHB cohort, using relatively higher cut-off values for hepatic steatosis significantly improved the false-positive rate of LSM in the steatosis cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Steatosis significantly influenced LSM, with a higher value in the early stage of liver fibrosis but did not affect the diagnostic efficiency of LSM for staging liver fibrosis. Moreover, using relatively high cut-off values significantly improved the false-positive rate of LSM in CHB patients with steatosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>The identified correlation between MRI-PDFF and VCTE-measured LSM is not clinically relevant since the diagnostic performance of LSM in staging liver fibrosis is not affected by steatosis. A higher cut-off should be applied in CHB patients with steatosis to improve the false-positive rate.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Steatosis can affect liver stiff measurement (LSM) values in the early stage of liver fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of LSM in staging liver fibrosis is not affected by steatosis. LSM's cutoffs should be increased in patients with steatosis to improve the false-positive rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01857-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the impact of hepatic steatosis measured by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) value and its diagnostic performance for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods: A total of 914 patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy and MRI-PDFF were retrospectively reviewed. The influence of MRI-PDFF on LSM value was assessed using univariate and multivariate linear analyses. To assess the influence of liver steatosis on the diagnostic performance of LSM, a series of ROC analyses were performed and compared by stratifying patients into non-steatosis (PDFF < 5%) and steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%) groups according to MRI-PDFF values. The effects of different LSM cut-off values on the false-positive rate in the steatosis cohort were compared using McNemar's test.

Results: LSM values were significantly affected by MRI-PDFF in the entire cohort (B-coefficient: 0.003, p < 0.001), F1 cohort (B-coefficient: 0.005, p < 0.001), and F2 cohort (B-coefficient: 0.003, p = 0.002). Hepatic steatosis was not observed to have a significant influence on the ROC curve of LSM for staging liver fibrosis. Compared with using the cut-off values for the CHB cohort, using relatively higher cut-off values for hepatic steatosis significantly improved the false-positive rate of LSM in the steatosis cohort.

Conclusion: Steatosis significantly influenced LSM, with a higher value in the early stage of liver fibrosis but did not affect the diagnostic efficiency of LSM for staging liver fibrosis. Moreover, using relatively high cut-off values significantly improved the false-positive rate of LSM in CHB patients with steatosis.

Clinical relevance statement: The identified correlation between MRI-PDFF and VCTE-measured LSM is not clinically relevant since the diagnostic performance of LSM in staging liver fibrosis is not affected by steatosis. A higher cut-off should be applied in CHB patients with steatosis to improve the false-positive rate.

Key points: Steatosis can affect liver stiff measurement (LSM) values in the early stage of liver fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of LSM in staging liver fibrosis is not affected by steatosis. LSM's cutoffs should be increased in patients with steatosis to improve the false-positive rate.

肝脏脂肪变性对振动控制瞬态弹性成像法测量肝脏硬度的影响及其在识别慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化方面的诊断性能。
目的探讨核磁共振-质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)测量的肝脂肪变性对肝硬度测量值(LSM)的影响及其对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化分期的诊断性能:方法:回顾性研究了914例接受肝活检和MRI-PDFF检查的慢性乙型肝炎患者。采用单变量和多变量线性分析评估了 MRI-PDFF 对 LSM 值的影响。为了评估肝脏脂肪变性对 LSM 诊断性能的影响,进行了一系列 ROC 分析,并通过将患者分为非脂肪变性(PDFF 结果)进行比较:在整个队列中,MRI-PDFF 对 LSM 值有明显影响(B 系数:0.003,P 结论:MRI-PDFF 对 LSM 值有明显影响:脂肪变性对 LSM 有明显影响,肝纤维化早期的 LSM 值较高,但并不影响 LSM 对肝纤维化分期的诊断效率。此外,使用相对较高的临界值可明显改善脂肪变性 CHB 患者 LSM 的假阳性率:MRI-PDFF与VCTE测量的LSM之间已确定的相关性与临床无关,因为LSM在肝纤维化分期中的诊断性能不受脂肪变性的影响。对于脂肪变性的慢性阻塞性肺病患者,应采用更高的临界值来提高假阳性率:要点:脂肪变性会影响肝纤维化早期的肝硬度测量值。脂肪变性不会影响肝纤维化分期中肝硬度测量的诊断性能。应提高脂肪变性患者的肝硬度测量临界值,以提高假阳性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信