Safety, immunogenicity and immune-persistence of a lyophilized human rabies vaccine (Vero cells) under Zagreb and Essen regimens: a randomized, open-label, controlled phase III clinical trial in healthy participants aged 10-60 years in China.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1444686
Zhenzhen Liang, Xu Chen, Bo Xing, Xiaosong Hu, Miaomiao Liu, Xinpei Zhang, Yugang Shen, Yan Wang, Yingping Chen, Huakun Lv, Yu Mao
{"title":"Safety, immunogenicity and immune-persistence of a lyophilized human rabies vaccine (Vero cells) under Zagreb and Essen regimens: a randomized, open-label, controlled phase III clinical trial in healthy participants aged 10-60 years in China.","authors":"Zhenzhen Liang, Xu Chen, Bo Xing, Xiaosong Hu, Miaomiao Liu, Xinpei Zhang, Yugang Shen, Yan Wang, Yingping Chen, Huakun Lv, Yu Mao","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2024.1444686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rabies continues to be a significant global public health concern, particularly in the Asia region where it is associated with high mortality rate. The administration of effective vaccination is essential in preventing this potentially fatal viral infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two rabies vaccination schedules: the Zagreb (2-1-1) and Essen (1-1-1-1-1) regimens, in a cohort of healthy Chinese individuals aged 10-60 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled, non-inferiority phase 3 trial from July 2021 to November 2022, enrolling a total of 1200 participants. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the Zagreb or Essen vaccination regimen. The primary outcomes were safety, immunogenicity, and immune persistence. Safety was monitored through adverse event reporting, while immunogenicity was determined by measuring rabies-virus-neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentrations using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Immune persistence was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two vaccination regimens exhibited comparable safety records, with mild and transient adverse events predominantly occurring within 0-3 days post-vaccination. The Zagreb regimen demonstrated non-inferiority in terms of seroconversion rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies compared to the Essen regimen at both 14 days post-first vaccination and 14 days post-full vaccination. Additionally, both groups displayed nearly 100% seropositivity rate at 3,6, and 12 months. No serious adverse events associated with vaccination were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this Phase 3 clinical trial provide compelling evidence that the Zagreb regimen is a feasible alternative when compared to the Essen regimen for rabies vaccination, offering a more pragmatic and cost-efficient approach to rabies prevention and control.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20210426.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1444686"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1444686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rabies continues to be a significant global public health concern, particularly in the Asia region where it is associated with high mortality rate. The administration of effective vaccination is essential in preventing this potentially fatal viral infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two rabies vaccination schedules: the Zagreb (2-1-1) and Essen (1-1-1-1-1) regimens, in a cohort of healthy Chinese individuals aged 10-60 years.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled, non-inferiority phase 3 trial from July 2021 to November 2022, enrolling a total of 1200 participants. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the Zagreb or Essen vaccination regimen. The primary outcomes were safety, immunogenicity, and immune persistence. Safety was monitored through adverse event reporting, while immunogenicity was determined by measuring rabies-virus-neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentrations using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Immune persistence was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-vaccination.

Results: The two vaccination regimens exhibited comparable safety records, with mild and transient adverse events predominantly occurring within 0-3 days post-vaccination. The Zagreb regimen demonstrated non-inferiority in terms of seroconversion rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies compared to the Essen regimen at both 14 days post-first vaccination and 14 days post-full vaccination. Additionally, both groups displayed nearly 100% seropositivity rate at 3,6, and 12 months. No serious adverse events associated with vaccination were reported.

Conclusion: The findings of this Phase 3 clinical trial provide compelling evidence that the Zagreb regimen is a feasible alternative when compared to the Essen regimen for rabies vaccination, offering a more pragmatic and cost-efficient approach to rabies prevention and control.

Clinical trial registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20210426.

萨格勒布和埃森方案下冻干人用狂犬病疫苗(Vero 细胞)的安全性、免疫原性和免疫持久性:在中国 10-60 岁健康参与者中进行的随机、开放标签、对照 III 期临床试验。
背景:狂犬病仍然是全球公共卫生的一个重大问题,尤其是在亚洲地区,该病的死亡率很高。接种有效的疫苗对于预防这种可能致命的病毒感染至关重要。本研究旨在评估两种狂犬病疫苗接种方案的免疫原性和安全性:萨格勒布方案(2-1-1)和埃森方案(1-1-1-1-1):我们于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 11 月开展了一项随机、开放标签、对照、非劣效性的 3 期试验,共招募了 1200 名参与者。参与者被随机分配接受萨格勒布或埃森疫苗接种方案。主要结果是安全性、免疫原性和免疫持久性。安全性通过不良事件报告进行监测,免疫原性则通过使用快速荧光聚焦抑制试验(RFFIT)测定狂犬病病毒中和抗体(RVNA)浓度来确定。在接种后3、6和12个月对免疫持久性进行了评估:结果:两种疫苗接种方案的安全性相当,主要在接种后 0-3 天内出现轻微和短暂的不良反应。与埃森方案相比,萨格勒布方案在首次接种后 14 天和全程接种后 14 天的血清转换率和抗体几何平均浓度 (GMC) 方面均无劣势。此外,两组在 3、6 和 12 个月时的血清阳性率均接近 100%。没有与疫苗接种相关的严重不良事件报告:这项 3 期临床试验的结果提供了令人信服的证据,证明与埃森方案相比,萨格勒布方案是一种可行的狂犬病疫苗接种替代方案,为狂犬病预防和控制提供了一种更实用、更具成本效益的方法。临床试验注册:http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn,标识符为 CTR20210426。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信