Malignancy risk stratification prediction of BI-RADS 4B calcifications based on contrast-enhanced mammographic features: a multicenter study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Rong Long, Yao Luo, Min Cao, Kun Cao, Xiao-Ting Li, Ning Mao, Guang Yang, Ying-Shi Sun
{"title":"Malignancy risk stratification prediction of BI-RADS 4B calcifications based on contrast-enhanced mammographic features: a multicenter study.","authors":"Rong Long, Yao Luo, Min Cao, Kun Cao, Xiao-Ting Li, Ning Mao, Guang Yang, Ying-Shi Sun","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07546-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the malignant risk of BI-RADS 4B calcification-only lesions detected on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and to develop a predictive model for stratifying malignant risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 131 calcification-only lesions of BI-RADS 4B identified on low-energy (LE) images of CEM from 125 females between March 2017 and April 2023 at three institutions. The patients were grouped as training (95 lesions) and external validation sets (36 lesions). On LE images, morphological features of the calcifications, including morphology, distribution and size, were evaluated. On recombined images, the presence and types of enhancement were assessed as qualitative variables, and the grey values from lesion areas and background were measured as quantitative variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to construct a predictive model. The discrimination of the model was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and confirmed by the external validation set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 131 lesions, 43 were malignant. The morphology, distribution, the presence and types of enhancement and the grey values of calcifications showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions. The nomogram was developed based on morphology and the presence of enhancement, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.859 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.769, 0.949) and 0.856 (95% CI: 0.729, 0.983) in the training and external validation sets, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On CEM, the presence of enhancement and morphology were identified as independent predictors of malignant calcifications of BI-RADS 4B. The predictive model demonstrated favorable performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07546-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the malignant risk of BI-RADS 4B calcification-only lesions detected on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and to develop a predictive model for stratifying malignant risk.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 131 calcification-only lesions of BI-RADS 4B identified on low-energy (LE) images of CEM from 125 females between March 2017 and April 2023 at three institutions. The patients were grouped as training (95 lesions) and external validation sets (36 lesions). On LE images, morphological features of the calcifications, including morphology, distribution and size, were evaluated. On recombined images, the presence and types of enhancement were assessed as qualitative variables, and the grey values from lesion areas and background were measured as quantitative variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to construct a predictive model. The discrimination of the model was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and confirmed by the external validation set.

Results: Of the 131 lesions, 43 were malignant. The morphology, distribution, the presence and types of enhancement and the grey values of calcifications showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions. The nomogram was developed based on morphology and the presence of enhancement, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.859 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.769, 0.949) and 0.856 (95% CI: 0.729, 0.983) in the training and external validation sets, respectively.

Conclusion: On CEM, the presence of enhancement and morphology were identified as independent predictors of malignant calcifications of BI-RADS 4B. The predictive model demonstrated favorable performance.

基于对比增强乳腺 X 线摄影特征的 BI-RADS 4B 级钙化恶性风险分层预测:一项多中心研究。
目的:本研究旨在调查影响对比增强乳腺摄影术(CEM)检测到的BI-RADS 4B纯钙化病变恶性风险的因素,并建立恶性风险分层的预测模型:2017年3月至2023年4月期间,三家机构对125名女性在CEM低能量(LE)图像上发现的131个BI-RADS 4B纯钙化病变进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为训练集(95 个病灶)和外部验证集(36 个病灶)。在LE图像上,评估了钙化的形态特征,包括形态、分布和大小。在重组图像上,增强的存在和类型作为定性变量进行评估,病变区域和背景的灰度值作为定量变量进行测量。多变量逻辑回归分析用于构建预测模型。该模型的判别能力由接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)进行评估,并由外部验证集进行确认:在 131 个病灶中,43 个为恶性。良性病变和恶性病变在形态、分布、强化的存在和类型以及钙化的灰度值方面存在显著差异。根据形态学和是否存在强化制定的提名图在训练集和外部验证集的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.859(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.769, 0.949)和 0.856(95% CI:0.729, 0.983):在 CEM 中,增强的存在和形态被确定为 BI-RADS 4B 恶性钙化的独立预测因素。该预测模型表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信