Cervical cancer screening uptake in Arab countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hebatalla Abdelmaksoud Abdelmonsef Ahmed, Mohammed Hamdi Abbas, Hussein Awed Hussein, Rehab Salah Fathy Nasr, Amira Ahmed Lashen, Heba Khaled, Ahmed Azzam
{"title":"Cervical cancer screening uptake in Arab countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Hebatalla Abdelmaksoud Abdelmonsef Ahmed, Mohammed Hamdi Abbas, Hussein Awed Hussein, Rehab Salah Fathy Nasr, Amira Ahmed Lashen, Heba Khaled, Ahmed Azzam","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13204-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer, though one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, holds immense potential for prevention through screening. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the rate of cervical cancer screening in Arab countries and identify barriers among those who did not participate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted from January 1st to June 1st,2024, including all observational studies that reported cervical cancer screening uptake in any Arab country. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. The study followed PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis, covering 55 studies and 204,940 Arab women, found an overall cervical cancer screening uptake rate of 18.2% (95% CI: 13.9-23.6), with sensitivity analysis confirming the reliability of this estimate. Country disparities were evident, with Bahrain having the highest uptake at 44.1%, while Somalia had the lowest at 8.9%. Among women who underwent screening, the majority were ever-married (94.7%) and held positive attitudes towards screening (91.0%). Barriers to screening were common among women who did not participate, with the most frequent reasons being a lack of information (25.1%), the misconception of feeling healthy (24.5%), fear of the procedure (19.3%), and feelings of embarrassment (13.2%). Additionally, women who were screened had lower perceived barrier scores (SMD = -0.466) and higher perceived benefits scores (SMD = 0.379) than those who were not (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis reveals a low overall cervical cancer screening uptake (18.2%) among Arab women. Key barriers such as lack of information, fear, the misconception of feeling healthy, and embarrassment hinder uptake. This alarmingly low rate underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions to address these barriers and promote awareness of early detection's life-saving potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13204-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer, though one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, holds immense potential for prevention through screening. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the rate of cervical cancer screening in Arab countries and identify barriers among those who did not participate.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from January 1st to June 1st,2024, including all observational studies that reported cervical cancer screening uptake in any Arab country. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. The study followed PRISMA guidelines.

Results: This meta-analysis, covering 55 studies and 204,940 Arab women, found an overall cervical cancer screening uptake rate of 18.2% (95% CI: 13.9-23.6), with sensitivity analysis confirming the reliability of this estimate. Country disparities were evident, with Bahrain having the highest uptake at 44.1%, while Somalia had the lowest at 8.9%. Among women who underwent screening, the majority were ever-married (94.7%) and held positive attitudes towards screening (91.0%). Barriers to screening were common among women who did not participate, with the most frequent reasons being a lack of information (25.1%), the misconception of feeling healthy (24.5%), fear of the procedure (19.3%), and feelings of embarrassment (13.2%). Additionally, women who were screened had lower perceived barrier scores (SMD = -0.466) and higher perceived benefits scores (SMD = 0.379) than those who were not (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals a low overall cervical cancer screening uptake (18.2%) among Arab women. Key barriers such as lack of information, fear, the misconception of feeling healthy, and embarrassment hinder uptake. This alarmingly low rate underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions to address these barriers and promote awareness of early detection's life-saving potential.

阿拉伯国家接受宫颈癌筛查的情况:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:宫颈癌是全球妇女最常见的癌症之一,但通过筛查预防宫颈癌的潜力巨大。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估阿拉伯国家的宫颈癌筛查率,并找出未参加筛查者的障碍:方法:我们在 2024 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 1 日期间进行了一次全面搜索,包括所有报告阿拉伯国家宫颈癌筛查率的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,以估算总体患病率,并进行了敏感性分析以检验研究结果的稳健性。研究遵循了 PRISMA 指南:这项荟萃分析涵盖 55 项研究和 204,940 名阿拉伯妇女,发现宫颈癌筛查的总体接受率为 18.2%(95% CI:13.9-23.6),敏感性分析证实了这一估计值的可靠性。各国的差异非常明显,巴林的接受率最高,为 44.1%,而索马里最低,仅为 8.9%。在接受筛查的妇女中,大多数为已婚妇女(94.7%),对筛查持积极态度(91.0%)。未参加筛查的妇女普遍存在筛查障碍,最常见的原因是缺乏信息(25.1%)、对健康感觉的误解(24.5%)、对筛查过程的恐惧(19.3%)以及感到尴尬(13.2%)。此外,与未接受筛查的妇女相比,接受筛查的妇女感知障碍得分较低(SMD = -0.466),而感知益处得分较高(SMD = 0.379)(P 结论:该荟萃分析表明,接受筛查的妇女比未接受筛查的妇女感知障碍得分更低(SMD = -0.466):这项荟萃分析显示,阿拉伯妇女接受宫颈癌筛查的总体比例较低(18.2%)。缺乏信息、恐惧、对健康感觉的误解以及尴尬等主要障碍阻碍了妇女接受筛查。这一令人震惊的低接受率突出表明,迫切需要采取有针对性的干预措施来消除这些障碍,并提高人们对早期检测的救生潜力的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信