Michael Tran Duong, Sandhitsu R Das, Pulkit Khandelwal, Xueying Lyu, Long Xie, Emily McGrew, Nadia Dehghani, Corey T McMillan, Edward B Lee, Leslie M Shaw, Paul A Yushkevich, David A Wolk, Ilya M Nasrallah
{"title":"Hypometabolic mismatch with atrophy and tau pathology in mixed Alzheimer's and Lewy body disease.","authors":"Michael Tran Duong, Sandhitsu R Das, Pulkit Khandelwal, Xueying Lyu, Long Xie, Emily McGrew, Nadia Dehghani, Corey T McMillan, Edward B Lee, Leslie M Shaw, Paul A Yushkevich, David A Wolk, Ilya M Nasrallah","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypathology is a major driver of heterogeneity in the clinical presentation and extent of neurodegeneration (N) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Beyond amyloid (A) and tau (T) pathologies, over half of patients with AD have concomitant pathology such as α-synuclein (S) in mixed AD with Lewy body disease (LBD). Patients with multiple aetiology dementia such as AD + LBD have faster progression and potentially differential responses to targeted treatments, although the diagnosis of AD + LBD can be challenging given the overlapping clinical and imaging features. Development and validation of improved in vivo biomarkers are required to study relationships between N and S and identify imaging patterns reflecting mixed AD + LBD pathologies. We hypothesized that individual proteinopathies, such as T and S, are associated with commensurate levels of N. Thus, we assessed biomarkers of A, T, N and S with PET, MRI and CSF seeding amplification assay (SAA) data to determine molecular presentations of mixed A+S+ versus A+S- cognitively impaired patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Strikingly, A+S+ patients had parieto-occipital 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism (a measure of N) disproportionate to the degree of regional atrophy or T burden, highlighting worse hypometabolism associated with S+ status on SAA. Following up on this hypometabolic mismatch with CSF metabolite and proteome analyses, we found that A+S+ patients exhibited lower CSF levels of dopamine metabolites and synaptic markers like neuronal pentraxin-2 (NPTX2), suggesting that altered neurotransmission and neuron integrity contribute to this dissociation between metabolic PET and MRI. Potential confounders exist when studying relations between N, AD and LBD pathologies, including neuroinflammation and other non-Alzheimer's pathologies in mixed dementia, although our findings imply posterior hypometabolic mismatch is related more to S than vascular or TDP-43 pathology. Overall, A+S+ patients had posterior mismatch with excessive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism relative to atrophy or T load, possibly reflecting impaired neuronal integrity. Further research must disentangle the impact of multiple proteinopathies and clinicopathologic factors on hypometabolism and atrophy. Cumulatively, patients with mixed AD + LBD aetiologies harbour a unique metabolic PET mismatch signature.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":" ","pages":"1577-1587"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12073973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polypathology is a major driver of heterogeneity in the clinical presentation and extent of neurodegeneration (N) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Beyond amyloid (A) and tau (T) pathologies, over half of patients with AD have concomitant pathology such as α-synuclein (S) in mixed AD with Lewy body disease (LBD). Patients with multiple aetiology dementia such as AD + LBD have faster progression and potentially differential responses to targeted treatments, although the diagnosis of AD + LBD can be challenging given the overlapping clinical and imaging features. Development and validation of improved in vivo biomarkers are required to study relationships between N and S and identify imaging patterns reflecting mixed AD + LBD pathologies. We hypothesized that individual proteinopathies, such as T and S, are associated with commensurate levels of N. Thus, we assessed biomarkers of A, T, N and S with PET, MRI and CSF seeding amplification assay (SAA) data to determine molecular presentations of mixed A+S+ versus A+S- cognitively impaired patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Strikingly, A+S+ patients had parieto-occipital 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism (a measure of N) disproportionate to the degree of regional atrophy or T burden, highlighting worse hypometabolism associated with S+ status on SAA. Following up on this hypometabolic mismatch with CSF metabolite and proteome analyses, we found that A+S+ patients exhibited lower CSF levels of dopamine metabolites and synaptic markers like neuronal pentraxin-2 (NPTX2), suggesting that altered neurotransmission and neuron integrity contribute to this dissociation between metabolic PET and MRI. Potential confounders exist when studying relations between N, AD and LBD pathologies, including neuroinflammation and other non-Alzheimer's pathologies in mixed dementia, although our findings imply posterior hypometabolic mismatch is related more to S than vascular or TDP-43 pathology. Overall, A+S+ patients had posterior mismatch with excessive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism relative to atrophy or T load, possibly reflecting impaired neuronal integrity. Further research must disentangle the impact of multiple proteinopathies and clinicopathologic factors on hypometabolism and atrophy. Cumulatively, patients with mixed AD + LBD aetiologies harbour a unique metabolic PET mismatch signature.
期刊介绍:
Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.