Understanding Goal Setting and Behavior Change Mechanics in an Older Adult Sitting Reduction Intervention.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Laura Yarborough, Lisa Shulman, David E Arterburn, Julie Cooper, Kristin Delaney, Camilo Estrada, Beverly B Green, Erika Holden, Jennifer B McClure, Diana Romero, Dori E Rosenberg
{"title":"Understanding Goal Setting and Behavior Change Mechanics in an Older Adult Sitting Reduction Intervention.","authors":"Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Laura Yarborough, Lisa Shulman, David E Arterburn, Julie Cooper, Kristin Delaney, Camilo Estrada, Beverly B Green, Erika Holden, Jennifer B McClure, Diana Romero, Dori E Rosenberg","doi":"10.1177/08901171241302137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We explored intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, and the goals and reminder strategies participants chose to reduce sitting.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Mixed methods approach leveraging data collected during study coaching and fidelity monitoring.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A successful 6-month randomized controlled trial of a sedentary behavior (SB) intervention for adults ≥60 years in Washington, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>N = 283 (140 intervention, 143 attention control); mean age 69, 66% women, 69% Non-Hispanic White.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Theory-based SB reduction intervention structured around phone-based health coaching and goal setting. Attention control received equal coaching on non-SB health topics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Coaches tracked all participant goals, and 8% of visits were randomly observed and fidelity coded using a structured template. Participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire at study end. Goals data were qualitatively grouped by reminder strategy and topic. Fidelity and satisfaction data were summarized and compared by study arm using two-sided paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both participants' satisfaction (>90% satisfied, between-group <i>P</i> = .195) and coach fidelity to intervention content and techniques were high (96% sessions set SMART goals, <i>P</i> = .343) across both arms. Intervention participants primarily set goals leveraging outward (e.g., fitness band prompts) and habit (e.g., adding standing to a daily meal) reminder strategies highly tailored to individual preferences and lifestyle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants' SB-related goals varied widely, suggesting tailored intervention approaches are important to change sitting behavior, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241302137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241302137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We explored intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, and the goals and reminder strategies participants chose to reduce sitting.

Approach: Mixed methods approach leveraging data collected during study coaching and fidelity monitoring.

Setting: A successful 6-month randomized controlled trial of a sedentary behavior (SB) intervention for adults ≥60 years in Washington, USA.

Participants: N = 283 (140 intervention, 143 attention control); mean age 69, 66% women, 69% Non-Hispanic White.

Intervention: Theory-based SB reduction intervention structured around phone-based health coaching and goal setting. Attention control received equal coaching on non-SB health topics.

Method: Coaches tracked all participant goals, and 8% of visits were randomly observed and fidelity coded using a structured template. Participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire at study end. Goals data were qualitatively grouped by reminder strategy and topic. Fidelity and satisfaction data were summarized and compared by study arm using two-sided paired t-tests.

Results: Both participants' satisfaction (>90% satisfied, between-group P = .195) and coach fidelity to intervention content and techniques were high (96% sessions set SMART goals, P = .343) across both arms. Intervention participants primarily set goals leveraging outward (e.g., fitness band prompts) and habit (e.g., adding standing to a daily meal) reminder strategies highly tailored to individual preferences and lifestyle.

Conclusion: Participants' SB-related goals varied widely, suggesting tailored intervention approaches are important to change sitting behavior, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions.

了解老年人减少久坐干预中的目标设定和行为改变机制。
目的:我们探讨了干预的忠实度、参与者的满意度以及参与者为减少久坐而选择的目标和提醒策略:方法:混合方法,利用在研究辅导和忠实度监测过程中收集的数据:在美国华盛顿州成功开展了一项为期 6 个月的久坐行为(SB)干预随机对照试验:N=283(140 人干预,143 人注意对照);平均年龄 69 岁,66% 为女性,69% 为非西班牙裔白人:干预措施:基于理论的减少 SB 干预措施,以电话健康指导和目标设定为基础。干预措施:以理论为基础的减少 SB 干预措施,以电话健康指导和目标设定为核心;关注对照组接受同等的非 SB 健康主题指导:教练跟踪所有参与者的目标,随机观察 8%的访问,并使用结构化模板对忠诚度进行编码。参与者在研究结束时填写满意度问卷。目标数据按提醒策略和主题进行定性分组。采用双侧配对 t 检验对保真度和满意度数据进行总结,并按研究臂进行比较:结果:两组参与者的满意度(满意度大于 90%,组间 P = .195)和教练对干预内容和技巧的忠实度都很高(96% 的课程设定了 SMART 目标,P = .343)。干预参与者主要利用外显(如健身带提示)和习惯(如在每日膳食中加入站立)提醒策略设定目标,这些策略高度符合个人喜好和生活方式:结论:参与者的坐姿相关目标差异很大,这表明量身定制的干预方法对于改变坐姿行为非常重要,尤其是对于患有慢性疾病的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信