Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Laura Yarborough, Lisa Shulman, David E Arterburn, Julie Cooper, Kristin Delaney, Camilo Estrada, Beverly B Green, Erika Holden, Jennifer B McClure, Diana Romero, Dori E Rosenberg
{"title":"Understanding Goal Setting and Behavior Change Mechanics in an Older Adult Sitting Reduction Intervention.","authors":"Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Laura Yarborough, Lisa Shulman, David E Arterburn, Julie Cooper, Kristin Delaney, Camilo Estrada, Beverly B Green, Erika Holden, Jennifer B McClure, Diana Romero, Dori E Rosenberg","doi":"10.1177/08901171241302137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We explored intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, and the goals and reminder strategies participants chose to reduce sitting.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Mixed methods approach leveraging data collected during study coaching and fidelity monitoring.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A successful 6-month randomized controlled trial of a sedentary behavior (SB) intervention for adults ≥60 years in Washington, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>N = 283 (140 intervention, 143 attention control); mean age 69, 66% women, 69% Non-Hispanic White.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Theory-based SB reduction intervention structured around phone-based health coaching and goal setting. Attention control received equal coaching on non-SB health topics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Coaches tracked all participant goals, and 8% of visits were randomly observed and fidelity coded using a structured template. Participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire at study end. Goals data were qualitatively grouped by reminder strategy and topic. Fidelity and satisfaction data were summarized and compared by study arm using two-sided paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both participants' satisfaction (>90% satisfied, between-group <i>P</i> = .195) and coach fidelity to intervention content and techniques were high (96% sessions set SMART goals, <i>P</i> = .343) across both arms. Intervention participants primarily set goals leveraging outward (e.g., fitness band prompts) and habit (e.g., adding standing to a daily meal) reminder strategies highly tailored to individual preferences and lifestyle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants' SB-related goals varied widely, suggesting tailored intervention approaches are important to change sitting behavior, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241302137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241302137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We explored intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, and the goals and reminder strategies participants chose to reduce sitting.
Approach: Mixed methods approach leveraging data collected during study coaching and fidelity monitoring.
Setting: A successful 6-month randomized controlled trial of a sedentary behavior (SB) intervention for adults ≥60 years in Washington, USA.
Participants: N = 283 (140 intervention, 143 attention control); mean age 69, 66% women, 69% Non-Hispanic White.
Intervention: Theory-based SB reduction intervention structured around phone-based health coaching and goal setting. Attention control received equal coaching on non-SB health topics.
Method: Coaches tracked all participant goals, and 8% of visits were randomly observed and fidelity coded using a structured template. Participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire at study end. Goals data were qualitatively grouped by reminder strategy and topic. Fidelity and satisfaction data were summarized and compared by study arm using two-sided paired t-tests.
Results: Both participants' satisfaction (>90% satisfied, between-group P = .195) and coach fidelity to intervention content and techniques were high (96% sessions set SMART goals, P = .343) across both arms. Intervention participants primarily set goals leveraging outward (e.g., fitness band prompts) and habit (e.g., adding standing to a daily meal) reminder strategies highly tailored to individual preferences and lifestyle.
Conclusion: Participants' SB-related goals varied widely, suggesting tailored intervention approaches are important to change sitting behavior, particularly for older adults with chronic conditions.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.