Rehabilitation effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain threshold and tolerance, tactile sensation, and strength.

Emine Cihan, Cansu Sahbaz Pirinççi
{"title":"Rehabilitation effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain threshold and tolerance, tactile sensation, and strength.","authors":"Emine Cihan, Cansu Sahbaz Pirinççi","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.24000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the acute therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two individuals (164 upper limbs) participating in the study were divided into two groups: MLD and sham. Before and after treatment, measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain tolerance, muscle strength (using a hand dynamometer and pinchmeter), and two-point discrimination (2PD) with an esthesiometer were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, height, weight, body mass index, gender, and dominant extremity of the participants showed similar characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a difference hypothenar PPT (p = 0.038) and pain tolerance (p = 0.009), thenar PPT (p = 0.021) and pain tolerance (p = 0.001), mid-ulnar PPT (p = 0.028), biceps PPT (p < 0.001), pain tolerance (p < 0.001), and grip strength (p = 0.030) between the groups after the therapy. When comparison was made between the groups at baseline and after the treatment all were found to differ (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MLD reduced PPR, pain tolerance, hand grip, and pinch strength in young adults. However, in this population, the distance felt in 2PD evaluation with MLD decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.24000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the acute therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD).

Methods: Eighty-two individuals (164 upper limbs) participating in the study were divided into two groups: MLD and sham. Before and after treatment, measurements of pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain tolerance, muscle strength (using a hand dynamometer and pinchmeter), and two-point discrimination (2PD) with an esthesiometer were conducted.

Results: Age, height, weight, body mass index, gender, and dominant extremity of the participants showed similar characteristics (p > 0.05). There was a difference hypothenar PPT (p = 0.038) and pain tolerance (p = 0.009), thenar PPT (p = 0.021) and pain tolerance (p = 0.001), mid-ulnar PPT (p = 0.028), biceps PPT (p < 0.001), pain tolerance (p < 0.001), and grip strength (p = 0.030) between the groups after the therapy. When comparison was made between the groups at baseline and after the treatment all were found to differ (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: MLD reduced PPR, pain tolerance, hand grip, and pinch strength in young adults. However, in this population, the distance felt in 2PD evaluation with MLD decreased.

人工淋巴引流对疼痛阈值和耐受性、触觉和力量的康复效果。
目的:本研究评估了人工淋巴引流术(MLD)的急性治疗效果:本研究评估了人工淋巴引流术(MLD)的急性治疗效果:参加研究的 82 人(164 个上肢)分为两组:MLD组和假治疗组。在治疗前后,对压力痛阈值(PPT)、疼痛耐受性、肌肉力量(使用手部测力计和捏力计)和两点辨别力(2PD)进行了测量:结果:受试者的年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、性别和优势肢体的特征相似(P > 0.05)。治疗后,各组间的下桡侧 PPT(p = 0.038)和疼痛耐受性(p = 0.009)、踵侧 PPT(p = 0.021)和疼痛耐受性(p = 0.001)、中桡侧 PPT(p = 0.028)、肱二头肌 PPT(p < 0.001)、疼痛耐受性(p < 0.001)和握力(p = 0.030)均有差异。在对基线组和治疗后组进行比较时,发现所有组间均存在差异(P < 0.05):结论:MLD 降低了青壮年的肢体活动能力、疼痛耐受力、手部握力和捏力。然而,在这一人群中,使用 MLD 进行 2PD 评估时感受到的距离减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信