Enrollment in Alzheimer's disease-focused research registries: altruistic and egocentric motivations.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael Hennessy, Amy Bleakley, Erin Maloney, Jessica B Langbaum
{"title":"Enrollment in Alzheimer's disease-focused research registries: altruistic and egocentric motivations.","authors":"Michael Hennessy, Amy Bleakley, Erin Maloney, Jessica B Langbaum","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2430891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative effectiveness of altruistic and egocentric persuasion messages is an important research question when voluntary participation in medical research is the target behavior. In the US, most participants in Alzheimer's disease-focused research registries are White females, so increasing diversity in registry membership is a public health priority. We compared the association of two belief-based motivations - egocentric and altruistic - with intention to enroll in an Alzheimer's research registry using a nationally representative theory-based survey of US adults 50 years of age or older while oversampling Black and Hispanic respondents. With the exception of Hispanic females, there were few respondent differences between individual motivational belief items and the correlations between the altruistic and egocentric indices were similar with independent effects on intention: the effects of the two motivations on intention were not redundant. Further analysis demonstrated that a moderation model was not superior to an additive model when both altruistic and egocentric indices simultaneously predicted intention. Registry recruitment messages should use both altruistic and egocentric persuasive message components to increase enrollment into Alzheimer's research registries. Similar studies should determine if the additive effects of altruistic and egocentric motivations apply to other voluntary research participation contexts such as chronic diseases and mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2430891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relative effectiveness of altruistic and egocentric persuasion messages is an important research question when voluntary participation in medical research is the target behavior. In the US, most participants in Alzheimer's disease-focused research registries are White females, so increasing diversity in registry membership is a public health priority. We compared the association of two belief-based motivations - egocentric and altruistic - with intention to enroll in an Alzheimer's research registry using a nationally representative theory-based survey of US adults 50 years of age or older while oversampling Black and Hispanic respondents. With the exception of Hispanic females, there were few respondent differences between individual motivational belief items and the correlations between the altruistic and egocentric indices were similar with independent effects on intention: the effects of the two motivations on intention were not redundant. Further analysis demonstrated that a moderation model was not superior to an additive model when both altruistic and egocentric indices simultaneously predicted intention. Registry recruitment messages should use both altruistic and egocentric persuasive message components to increase enrollment into Alzheimer's research registries. Similar studies should determine if the additive effects of altruistic and egocentric motivations apply to other voluntary research participation contexts such as chronic diseases and mental illness.

阿尔茨海默病重点研究登记处的注册情况:利他动机和以自我为中心的动机。
当自愿参与医学研究成为目标行为时,利他主义和以自我为中心的说服信息的相对有效性是一个重要的研究问题。在美国,大多数阿尔茨海默病研究登记处的参与者都是白人女性,因此增加登记处成员的多样性是公共卫生的当务之急。我们对 50 岁以上的美国成年人进行了一次具有全国代表性的理论调查,同时对黑人和西班牙裔受访者进行了超量采样,比较了以自我为中心和利他主义这两种基于信念的动机与阿尔茨海默氏症研究注册机构注册意向之间的关联。除西班牙裔女性外,个体动机信念项目之间的受访者差异很小,利他主义和自我中心指数之间的相关性相似,对意向的影响是独立的:两种动机对意向的影响不是多余的。进一步的分析表明,当利他指数和自我中心指数同时预测意向时,调节模型并不优于加法模型。登记处招募信息应同时使用利他主义和以自我为中心的说服信息成分,以增加阿尔茨海默氏症研究登记处的注册人数。类似的研究应确定利他主义和自我中心动机的叠加效应是否适用于其他自愿参与研究的情况,如慢性病和精神疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信