In-vivo stress measurements in kitesurfing and wakeboarding: implications on load control and preventive approaches - an in-vivo field study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Frank Sander, Nina Neuse, Xiping Ren, Rainer Bader, Gerd Klinkmann, Christoph Lutter, Thomas Tischer
{"title":"In-vivo stress measurements in kitesurfing and wakeboarding: implications on load control and preventive approaches - an in-vivo field study.","authors":"Frank Sander, Nina Neuse, Xiping Ren, Rainer Bader, Gerd Klinkmann, Christoph Lutter, Thomas Tischer","doi":"10.1055/a-2438-8740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The trend sports kitesurfing and wakeboarding are increasingly gaining popularity. Tricks and high jumps - both in the air and over obstacles - are performed with increasing difficulty. Repeated high loads on the body, particularly when landing after a jump, can lead to overuse and acute injuries directly related to peak forces, particularly in the lower extremities.There is a lack of detailed analyses of these forces resulting from wakeboarding or kitesurfing, although such data would be relevant for the analysis of injury mechanisms and the subsequent development of prevention strategies. This study is the first of its kind in which the loads on the lower extremity during wakeboarding and kitesurfing were subjected to in-vivo measurements during various maneuvers.Six wakeboarders and 12 kitesurfers (6 with loop bindings and 6 with fixed bindings) were investigated (mean age 33.1 ± 9.9 years). Jump height, hang time, acceleration, and the maximum vertical ground reaction force of both feet during takeoff and landing were recorded by means of sensor insoles (Moticon, Germany) on the feet of the athletes and simultaneously by a height and acceleration sensor (PIQ Sport Intelligence) on the board. A statistical analysis was performed.The data showed that wakeboarders were exposed to higher loads than kitesurfers, with significant differences occurring only between wakeboarders and kitesurfers with loop bindings and between kitesurfers with loop bindings and fixed bindings. High mean forces occurred during the landing of wakeboarders (rear foot 24.24 N/kg ± 8.82; front foot 20.33 N/kg ± 5.05) compared to kitesurfers with loop bindings (rear foot 12.09 N/kg ± 5.6; front foot 12.23 N/kg ± 4.92) as well as partially in kitesurfers with fixed shoe bindings (front foot 13.61 N/kg ± 5.92). Forces during lift-off were comparable in the rear foot (wakeboarders, kitesurfers with fixed bindings, kitesurfers with loop bindings 14.17 ± 6.37 vs. 16.39 ± 4.99 vs. 14.72 ± 5.13 N/kg). Similarly, despite the higher average acceleration force of the wakeboarders (4.16 g ± 1.02), there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.166) compared to the kitesurfers.The in-vivo forces acting on the lower extremities during wakeboarding and kitesurfing are high (highest absolute values of 3012 N and relative values of 31.71 N/Kg). In addition, fixed boot bindings allow for the generation of higher forces than strap bindings. The results of our study have important implications on load control and preventive approaches in these two sports.</p>","PeriodicalId":51169,"journal":{"name":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2438-8740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trend sports kitesurfing and wakeboarding are increasingly gaining popularity. Tricks and high jumps - both in the air and over obstacles - are performed with increasing difficulty. Repeated high loads on the body, particularly when landing after a jump, can lead to overuse and acute injuries directly related to peak forces, particularly in the lower extremities.There is a lack of detailed analyses of these forces resulting from wakeboarding or kitesurfing, although such data would be relevant for the analysis of injury mechanisms and the subsequent development of prevention strategies. This study is the first of its kind in which the loads on the lower extremity during wakeboarding and kitesurfing were subjected to in-vivo measurements during various maneuvers.Six wakeboarders and 12 kitesurfers (6 with loop bindings and 6 with fixed bindings) were investigated (mean age 33.1 ± 9.9 years). Jump height, hang time, acceleration, and the maximum vertical ground reaction force of both feet during takeoff and landing were recorded by means of sensor insoles (Moticon, Germany) on the feet of the athletes and simultaneously by a height and acceleration sensor (PIQ Sport Intelligence) on the board. A statistical analysis was performed.The data showed that wakeboarders were exposed to higher loads than kitesurfers, with significant differences occurring only between wakeboarders and kitesurfers with loop bindings and between kitesurfers with loop bindings and fixed bindings. High mean forces occurred during the landing of wakeboarders (rear foot 24.24 N/kg ± 8.82; front foot 20.33 N/kg ± 5.05) compared to kitesurfers with loop bindings (rear foot 12.09 N/kg ± 5.6; front foot 12.23 N/kg ± 4.92) as well as partially in kitesurfers with fixed shoe bindings (front foot 13.61 N/kg ± 5.92). Forces during lift-off were comparable in the rear foot (wakeboarders, kitesurfers with fixed bindings, kitesurfers with loop bindings 14.17 ± 6.37 vs. 16.39 ± 4.99 vs. 14.72 ± 5.13 N/kg). Similarly, despite the higher average acceleration force of the wakeboarders (4.16 g ± 1.02), there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.166) compared to the kitesurfers.The in-vivo forces acting on the lower extremities during wakeboarding and kitesurfing are high (highest absolute values of 3012 N and relative values of 31.71 N/Kg). In addition, fixed boot bindings allow for the generation of higher forces than strap bindings. The results of our study have important implications on load control and preventive approaches in these two sports.

风筝冲浪和滑水运动的活体应力测量:对负荷控制和预防方法的影响--活体实地研究。
风筝冲浪和滑水运动越来越受欢迎。技巧和高空跳跃--无论是在空中还是越过障碍物--的难度越来越大。身体反复承受高负荷,特别是在跳跃后着陆时,可能导致过度使用和急性损伤,这与峰值力直接相关,尤其是在下肢。尽管这些数据对于分析损伤机制和随后制定预防策略很有意义,但目前还缺乏对滑水或风筝冲浪运动所产生的这些力的详细分析。本研究首次对滑水和风筝冲浪时下肢所受的负荷进行了活体测量。研究对象为 6 名滑水运动员和 12 名风筝冲浪运动员(6 名使用环形绑带,6 名使用固定绑带)(平均年龄为 33.1 ± 9.9 岁)。通过运动员脚上的传感器鞋垫(Moticon,德国)以及滑板上的高度和加速度传感器(PIQ Sport Intelligence)同时记录了起跳高度、悬挂时间、加速度以及起跳和着陆时双脚的最大垂直地面反作用力。数据显示,滑水运动员承受的负荷高于风筝冲浪运动员,只有滑水运动员和使用环形绑带的风筝冲浪运动员之间以及使用环形绑带和固定绑带的风筝冲浪运动员之间存在显著差异。滑水运动员着陆时的平均力较大(后脚 24.24 牛/千克 ± 8.82;前脚 20.33 牛/千克 ± 5.05),而使用环形绑带的风筝冲浪运动员的着陆力较大(后脚 12.09 牛/千克 ± 5.6;前脚 12.23 牛/千克 ± 4.92),使用固定鞋绑带的风筝冲浪运动员的着陆力也较小(前脚 13.61 牛/千克 ± 5.92)。后脚在腾空时的力与前脚相当(滑浪板运动员、使用固定绑带的风筝冲浪运动员、使用环形绑带的风筝冲浪运动员为 14.17 ± 6.37 vs. 16.39 ± 4.99 vs. 14.72 ± 5.13 N/kg)。同样,尽管滑水运动员的平均加速度较高(4.16 g ± 1.02),但与风筝冲浪运动员相比并无显著差异(p = 0.166)。此外,与绑带式绑定相比,固定式靴子绑定可产生更大的力。我们的研究结果对这两项运动的负荷控制和预防方法具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ihr Forum - Die Zeitschrift Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Infos von A bis Z: Grundlagen, Prävention und Rehabilitation Topaktuelle Themen: Abbildung der Verletzungen/Prävention bei Trendsportarten Vielfältiges Spektrum: Physiotherapie, Wissenschaft und angewandte Forschung, neue Produkte und Hilfsmittel Aktuelle Themen mit echtem Nutzwert Sporttraumatologie: Prävention, Therapie, Rehabilitation Sportphysiotherapie: Grundlagen, Biomechanik, Manuelle Therapie, Funktionelle Therapie, Trainingstherapie im Sport, Geräte, Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信