Mateusz Czajkowski, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Katarzyna Czajkowska, Piotr M Wierzbicki, Adrian Poterek, Roman Sosnowski, Małgorzata Sokołowska-Wojdyło, Tomasz Szydełko, Marzena Kogut-Wierzbicka, Marcin Matuszewski
{"title":"Partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft: a multicenter experience.","authors":"Mateusz Czajkowski, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Katarzyna Czajkowska, Piotr M Wierzbicki, Adrian Poterek, Roman Sosnowski, Małgorzata Sokołowska-Wojdyło, Tomasz Szydełko, Marzena Kogut-Wierzbicka, Marcin Matuszewski","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05924-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penile cancer is a relatively rare neoplasm in developed countries, with the majority of newly diagnosed cases presenting as organ-confined, with a 5-year survival rate of 90%. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the impact of penile tumor resection on sexual and urinary function. Regrettably, the literature is devoid of comprehensive, step-by-step video instructions for the surgical procedure of partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft (0.3 mm). This study aimed to demonstrate a step-by-step video of the partial penectomy technique with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft and to present the outcomes of this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study was initiated in April 2019 and completed in February 2023, enrolling 54 male patients who underwent partial penectomy and reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft (0.3 mm). The study collected data on the local recurrence rates, overall survival, sexual and voiding functions and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average patient age was 61.26 years old (range: 26-82 years). Following penile-sparing surgery, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited favorable results. Among the 54 patients, 37 (68.5%) were classified as sexually active and 50 (92.6%) demonstrated good voiding function. Excellent cosmetic outcomes were achieved in 52 patients (96.3%), and the average size of the negative resection margins was 4.75±4.162 mm (range: 0.5 to 20 mm). Notably, no positive margins were observed. Patient outcomes depend on the tumor stage and histologic grade rather than the size of the surgical margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft has excellent oncological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05924-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Penile cancer is a relatively rare neoplasm in developed countries, with the majority of newly diagnosed cases presenting as organ-confined, with a 5-year survival rate of 90%. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the impact of penile tumor resection on sexual and urinary function. Regrettably, the literature is devoid of comprehensive, step-by-step video instructions for the surgical procedure of partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft (0.3 mm). This study aimed to demonstrate a step-by-step video of the partial penectomy technique with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft and to present the outcomes of this procedure.
Methods: This multicenter study was initiated in April 2019 and completed in February 2023, enrolling 54 male patients who underwent partial penectomy and reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft (0.3 mm). The study collected data on the local recurrence rates, overall survival, sexual and voiding functions and complications.
Results: The average patient age was 61.26 years old (range: 26-82 years). Following penile-sparing surgery, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited favorable results. Among the 54 patients, 37 (68.5%) were classified as sexually active and 50 (92.6%) demonstrated good voiding function. Excellent cosmetic outcomes were achieved in 52 patients (96.3%), and the average size of the negative resection margins was 4.75±4.162 mm (range: 0.5 to 20 mm). Notably, no positive margins were observed. Patient outcomes depend on the tumor stage and histologic grade rather than the size of the surgical margin.
Conclusions: Partial penectomy with reconstruction using a split-thickness skin graft has excellent oncological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes.