Pediatricians' Practices and Desired Resources for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence.

IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Partner Abuse Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1891/pa-2023-0044
Sarah Scott, Maya I Ragavan, Erin Mickievicz, Alexandra Handrinos, Joseph Amodei, Judy C Chang, Zaneta Balaban, Virginia Duplessis, Sarah DeGue, Andres Villaveces, Elizabeth Miller, Kimberly A Randell
{"title":"Pediatricians' Practices and Desired Resources for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Sarah Scott, Maya I Ragavan, Erin Mickievicz, Alexandra Handrinos, Joseph Amodei, Judy C Chang, Zaneta Balaban, Virginia Duplessis, Sarah DeGue, Andres Villaveces, Elizabeth Miller, Kimberly A Randell","doi":"10.1891/pa-2023-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore pediatricians' perspectives on supporting intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors, including (a) clinical practices and resource use, (b) ideal resources, and (c) barriers to the use of existing resources, we conducted dyadic and individual virtual interviews with pediatricians recruited through Twitter and the American Academy of Pediatrics Council, section, and chapter listservs. The interviews were approximately 60 minutes in length, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used a thematic analysis approach and hybrid deductive-inductive coding. Twenty-three pediatricians participated in 14 interviews. We identified four themes. Participants' current practices primarily focused on IPV screening and response to disclosure. They described strategies for IPV resource provision and decision-making involving child protective services. They identified multilevel barriers to addressing IPV, including barriers, such as time, identified in previous studies as well as barriers related to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth, the electronic health record, and disclosure-focused approaches. The participants desired provider-facing and caregiver-facing resources to strengthen the capacity to address IPV; some were unaware of currently available resources. They noted the need for continued attention to optimizing systems to enhance their capacity to support IPV survivors. Pediatricians report varying practices to address IPV and identify several surmountable barriers to supporting IPV survivors. Our study suggests that disclosure-driven clinical practices, confidentiality concerns, and lack of resources limit pediatricians' capacity to address IPV. Additional resource development and dissemination efforts are needed to improve the awareness of IPV resources currently available to pediatricians and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":46903,"journal":{"name":"Partner Abuse","volume":"15 4","pages":"550-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partner Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/pa-2023-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore pediatricians' perspectives on supporting intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors, including (a) clinical practices and resource use, (b) ideal resources, and (c) barriers to the use of existing resources, we conducted dyadic and individual virtual interviews with pediatricians recruited through Twitter and the American Academy of Pediatrics Council, section, and chapter listservs. The interviews were approximately 60 minutes in length, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used a thematic analysis approach and hybrid deductive-inductive coding. Twenty-three pediatricians participated in 14 interviews. We identified four themes. Participants' current practices primarily focused on IPV screening and response to disclosure. They described strategies for IPV resource provision and decision-making involving child protective services. They identified multilevel barriers to addressing IPV, including barriers, such as time, identified in previous studies as well as barriers related to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth, the electronic health record, and disclosure-focused approaches. The participants desired provider-facing and caregiver-facing resources to strengthen the capacity to address IPV; some were unaware of currently available resources. They noted the need for continued attention to optimizing systems to enhance their capacity to support IPV survivors. Pediatricians report varying practices to address IPV and identify several surmountable barriers to supporting IPV survivors. Our study suggests that disclosure-driven clinical practices, confidentiality concerns, and lack of resources limit pediatricians' capacity to address IPV. Additional resource development and dissemination efforts are needed to improve the awareness of IPV resources currently available to pediatricians and families.

儿科医生处理亲密伴侣暴力问题的做法和所需资源。
为了探索儿科医生对支持亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 幸存者的观点,包括(a)临床实践和资源使用,(b)理想资源,以及(c)使用现有资源的障碍,我们对通过 Twitter 和美国儿科学会理事会、分会和分会列表服务器招募的儿科医生进行了二人和个人虚拟访谈。访谈时长约 60 分钟,全程录音并逐字记录。我们采用了主题分析法和演绎-归纳混合编码法。23 名儿科医生参加了 14 次访谈。我们确定了四个主题。参与者目前的做法主要集中在 IPV 筛查和对披露的回应上。他们描述了提供 IPV 资源和涉及儿童保护服务决策的策略。他们指出了解决 IPV 问题的多层次障碍,包括以往研究中发现的时间等障碍,以及与 COVID-19 大流行、远程医疗、电子健康记录和以披露为重点的方法相关的障碍。与会者希望获得面向医疗服务提供者和护理者的资源,以加强解决 IPV 问题的能力;有些人不知道目前有哪些资源。他们指出,需要继续关注优化系统,以提高系统支持 IPV 幸存者的能力。儿科医生报告了不同的应对 IPV 的做法,并指出了支持 IPV 幸存者的几个可克服的障碍。我们的研究表明,以披露为导向的临床实践、保密问题以及资源匮乏限制了儿科医生解决 IPV 问题的能力。我们需要开展更多的资源开发和传播工作,以提高儿科医生和家庭对目前可用的 IPV 资源的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Partner Abuse
Partner Abuse FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信