Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0094
Gareth Iestyn Walters, Harriet Foley, Christopher Charles Huntley, Anadil Naveed, Kimberley Nettleton, Christopher Reilly, Maximillian Thomas, Claire Walker, Kyrie Wheeler
{"title":"Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review.","authors":"Gareth Iestyn Walters, Harriet Foley, Christopher Charles Huntley, Anadil Naveed, Kimberley Nettleton, Christopher Reilly, Maximillian Thomas, Claire Walker, Kyrie Wheeler","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related asthma (WRA) is prevalent yet under-recognized in UK primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify behaviour change interventions (BCI) intended for use in primary care to identify WRA, or any other chronic disease (that could be adapted for use in WRA).</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Systematic review METHOD: We searched CCRCT, Embase, PsychINFO and Ovid-MEDLINE databases (1946-2023) for studies describing development and/or evaluation of BCIs for case finding any chronic disease in primary care settings, aimed at either healthcare professionals and/or patients. Two blinded, independent reviewers screened abstracts and assessed full text articles. We undertook narrative synthesis for outcomes of usability and effectiveness, and for BCI development processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies from <i>n</i>=768 retrieved citations, comprising 3 randomised control trials, 1 uncontrolled experimental study, and 10 studies employing recognized multi-step BC methodologies. None of the studies were concerned with identification of asthma. BCIs had been developed for facilitating screening programmes (5), implementing guidelines (3) and individual case finding (6). Five studies measured effectiveness, in terms of screening adherence rates, pre-/post-intervention competency, satisfaction and usability, for clinicians, though none measured diagnostic rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single or multi-component BCIs has been developed specifically to aid identification of asthma or WRA, though other chronic diseases have been targeted. Development has used BC methodologies that involved gathering data from a range of sources, and developing content specific to defined at-risk populations, so are not immediately transferable. Such methodologies could be used similarly to develop a primary acre-based BCI for WRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Work-related asthma (WRA) is prevalent yet under-recognized in UK primary care.

Aim: We aimed to identify behaviour change interventions (BCI) intended for use in primary care to identify WRA, or any other chronic disease (that could be adapted for use in WRA).

Design & setting: Systematic review METHOD: We searched CCRCT, Embase, PsychINFO and Ovid-MEDLINE databases (1946-2023) for studies describing development and/or evaluation of BCIs for case finding any chronic disease in primary care settings, aimed at either healthcare professionals and/or patients. Two blinded, independent reviewers screened abstracts and assessed full text articles. We undertook narrative synthesis for outcomes of usability and effectiveness, and for BCI development processes.

Results: We included 14 studies from n=768 retrieved citations, comprising 3 randomised control trials, 1 uncontrolled experimental study, and 10 studies employing recognized multi-step BC methodologies. None of the studies were concerned with identification of asthma. BCIs had been developed for facilitating screening programmes (5), implementing guidelines (3) and individual case finding (6). Five studies measured effectiveness, in terms of screening adherence rates, pre-/post-intervention competency, satisfaction and usability, for clinicians, though none measured diagnostic rates.

Conclusion: No single or multi-component BCIs has been developed specifically to aid identification of asthma or WRA, though other chronic diseases have been targeted. Development has used BC methodologies that involved gathering data from a range of sources, and developing content specific to defined at-risk populations, so are not immediately transferable. Such methodologies could be used similarly to develop a primary acre-based BCI for WRA.

行为改变干预能否用于解决基层医疗机构对与工作有关的哮喘认识不足的问题?
背景:与工作有关的哮喘(WRA)在英国初级保健中普遍存在,但却未得到充分认识:目的:我们旨在确定用于初级保健的行为改变干预(BCI),以识别与工作有关的哮喘或任何其他慢性疾病(可调整用于与工作有关的哮喘):系统综述 方法:我们检索了 CCRCT、Embase、PsychINFO 和 Ovid-MEDLINE 数据库(1946-2023 年),以了解针对医护人员和/或患者的、描述在初级保健环境中用于病例查找任何慢性疾病的 BCI 的开发和/或评估的研究。两名盲人独立审稿人对摘要进行了筛选,并对全文进行了评估。我们对可用性和有效性结果以及BCI开发过程进行了叙述性综合:我们从 n=768 篇检索引文中纳入了 14 项研究,包括 3 项随机对照试验、1 项非对照实验研究和 10 项采用公认的多步骤 BC 方法的研究。其中没有一项研究涉及哮喘的识别。开发 BCIs 的目的是促进筛查计划(5)、实施指南(3)和个人病例查找(6)。五项研究从筛查依从率、干预前后能力、满意度和可用性等方面对临床医生的有效性进行了测量,但没有一项研究对诊断率进行测量:结论:目前还没有开发出专门用于帮助识别哮喘或 WRA 的单一或多组件 BCI,尽管其他慢性疾病也是目标。所开发的 BC 方法涉及从各种来源收集数据,并针对特定的高危人群开发内容,因此无法立即推广。此类方法可同样用于为 WRA 开发基于主要英亩的 BCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信