Reoperation Rate After Posterior Spinal Fusion Varies Significantly by Lenke Type.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00179
Peter Boufadel, Daniel Badin, Amer F Samdani, Paul D Sponseller
{"title":"Reoperation Rate After Posterior Spinal Fusion Varies Significantly by Lenke Type.","authors":"Peter Boufadel, Daniel Badin, Amer F Samdani, Paul D Sponseller","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lenke curve types can vary in their response to treatment. We explored potential differences in reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors among patients with different Lenke types who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied a multicenter database of patients with AIS who underwent index PSF at ≤21 years of age and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline and surgical characteristics were collected. Reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors were analyzed by Lenke type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,165 patients were included. The mean age was 14.6 years, and most patients were female (81%) and Caucasian (68%). The mean follow-up period was 4.4 years. A total of 138 patients (4.4%) underwent reoperation. The reoperation rate varied by Lenke type (p = 0.02): patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate (7.2%), and those with type-1 curves had the lowest (3.0%). The most common cause of reoperation was an instrumentation complication. The rate of reoperation due to an instrumentation complication varied by Lenke type (p < 0.01). Compared with patients with type-1 curves, those with type-5 curves had significantly higher rates of reoperation due to implant prominence (odds ratio [OR], 11.7; p = 0.03), loss of fixation (OR, 3.9; p = 0.01), or a broken rod (OR, 7.8; p = 0.02) and those with type-3 curves had a significantly higher rate of reoperation due to loss of fixation (OR, 4.37; p = 0.01). Independent risk factors for reoperation were a major curve magnitude of ≥60° in patients with type-5 curves (adjusted OR [aOR], 4.18; p = 0.04), a major curve correction of ≥40° in patients with type-5 curves (aOR, 3.6; p = 0.04), and a lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at or above L1 in patients with type-1 curves (aOR, 2.8; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reoperation rate for patients with AIS who underwent PSF varied by Lenke type. Patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate, whereas patients with type-1 curves had the lowest. Patients with Lenke type-5 curves had a higher rate of reoperation due to instrumentation complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lenke curve types can vary in their response to treatment. We explored potential differences in reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors among patients with different Lenke types who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: We studied a multicenter database of patients with AIS who underwent index PSF at ≤21 years of age and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline and surgical characteristics were collected. Reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors were analyzed by Lenke type.

Results: A total of 3,165 patients were included. The mean age was 14.6 years, and most patients were female (81%) and Caucasian (68%). The mean follow-up period was 4.4 years. A total of 138 patients (4.4%) underwent reoperation. The reoperation rate varied by Lenke type (p = 0.02): patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate (7.2%), and those with type-1 curves had the lowest (3.0%). The most common cause of reoperation was an instrumentation complication. The rate of reoperation due to an instrumentation complication varied by Lenke type (p < 0.01). Compared with patients with type-1 curves, those with type-5 curves had significantly higher rates of reoperation due to implant prominence (odds ratio [OR], 11.7; p = 0.03), loss of fixation (OR, 3.9; p = 0.01), or a broken rod (OR, 7.8; p = 0.02) and those with type-3 curves had a significantly higher rate of reoperation due to loss of fixation (OR, 4.37; p = 0.01). Independent risk factors for reoperation were a major curve magnitude of ≥60° in patients with type-5 curves (adjusted OR [aOR], 4.18; p = 0.04), a major curve correction of ≥40° in patients with type-5 curves (aOR, 3.6; p = 0.04), and a lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at or above L1 in patients with type-1 curves (aOR, 2.8; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: The reoperation rate for patients with AIS who underwent PSF varied by Lenke type. Patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate, whereas patients with type-1 curves had the lowest. Patients with Lenke type-5 curves had a higher rate of reoperation due to instrumentation complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

脊柱后路融合术后的再手术率因 Lenke 类型不同而有显著差异。
背景:伦克曲线类型对治疗的反应各不相同。我们探讨了因青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)而接受后路脊柱融合术(PSF)的不同 Lenke 型患者在再手术率、原因和风险因素方面的潜在差异:我们对一个多中心数据库进行了研究,该数据库收录了年龄小于21岁、至少随访2年、接受过指数脊柱后路融合术的AIS患者。我们收集了基线和手术特征。结果:结果:共纳入 3,165 名患者。平均年龄为 14.6 岁,大多数患者为女性(81%)和白种人(68%)。平均随访时间为 4.4 年。共有 138 名患者(4.4%)接受了再次手术。再手术率因Lenke类型而异(p = 0.02):5型曲线患者的再手术率最高(7.2%),1型曲线患者的再手术率最低(3.0%)。最常见的再手术原因是器械并发症。因器械并发症导致的再次手术率因 Lenke 类型而异(P < 0.01)。与1型曲线患者相比,5型曲线患者因种植体突出(几率比[OR],11.7;P = 0.03)、固定丧失(OR,3.9;P = 0.01)或杆断裂(OR,7.8;P = 0.02)而再次手术的比例明显更高,3型曲线患者因固定丧失而再次手术的比例明显更高(OR,4.37;P = 0.01)。再次手术的独立风险因素为:5型曲线患者的主要曲线幅度≥60°(调整OR [aOR],4.18;p = 0.04);5型曲线患者的主要曲线矫正幅度≥40°(aOR,3.6;p = 0.04);1型曲线患者的最低器械椎体(LIV)位于或高于L1(aOR,2.8;p = 0.02):结论:接受 PSF 的 AIS 患者的再手术率因 Lenke 类型而异。结论:接受 PSF 的 AIS 患者的再手术率因 Lenke 类型而异,5 型曲线患者的再手术率最高,而 1 型曲线患者的再手术率最低。Lenke-5型曲线患者因器械并发症而再次手术的比例较高:证据等级:治疗三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信