Masculinities in a feminist pedagogy: lessons for transformative gender and agriculture training.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1461445
Amon Ashaba Mwiine, Margaret Najjingo Mangheni, Elizabeth Asiimwe, Martha Businge, Fred Shimali, Losira Nasirumbi Sanya
{"title":"Masculinities in a feminist pedagogy: lessons for transformative gender and agriculture training.","authors":"Amon Ashaba Mwiine, Margaret Najjingo Mangheni, Elizabeth Asiimwe, Martha Businge, Fred Shimali, Losira Nasirumbi Sanya","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1461445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Masculinities and femininities are closely interconnected with men and women farmers' everyday lives; hence critical reflection on these interconnections should be central in gender training in agriculture. While a focus on men and masculinities is crucial for sustainable transformation of deep-rooted gender norms and practices that limit the attainment of gender equality, there are insufficient empirically tested pedagogical models for this purpose. We share a case study, the Gender Responsive Researchers Equipped for Agricultural Transformation (GREAT) model, which incorporates masculinities in a feminist pedagogy. We use external monitoring, evaluation, and learning data for two case study courses that integrate gender in plant breeding, seed systems, and agronomy to demonstrate the efficacy of integrating the concept of masculinity and reflections on male farmers' expectations, behaviors, and practices within a feminist approach to gender training. We conclude that feminist pedagogical practices offer insights into how gender training can integrate a masculinities perspective to move beyond divisive and narrow gender polarities towards addressing masculine norms that often hinder the attainment of gender transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1461445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1461445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Masculinities and femininities are closely interconnected with men and women farmers' everyday lives; hence critical reflection on these interconnections should be central in gender training in agriculture. While a focus on men and masculinities is crucial for sustainable transformation of deep-rooted gender norms and practices that limit the attainment of gender equality, there are insufficient empirically tested pedagogical models for this purpose. We share a case study, the Gender Responsive Researchers Equipped for Agricultural Transformation (GREAT) model, which incorporates masculinities in a feminist pedagogy. We use external monitoring, evaluation, and learning data for two case study courses that integrate gender in plant breeding, seed systems, and agronomy to demonstrate the efficacy of integrating the concept of masculinity and reflections on male farmers' expectations, behaviors, and practices within a feminist approach to gender training. We conclude that feminist pedagogical practices offer insights into how gender training can integrate a masculinities perspective to move beyond divisive and narrow gender polarities towards addressing masculine norms that often hinder the attainment of gender transformation.

女权主义教学法中的男子气概:性别与农业培训变革的经验教训。
男性特征和女性特征与男性和女性农民的日常生活密切相关;因此,对这些相互关系的批判性思考应成为农业性别培训的核心。虽然关注男性和男性特征对于可持续地改变限制实现性别平等的根深蒂固的性别规范和做法至关重要,但目前还没有足够的经过经验检验的教学模式来实现这一目的。我们分享了一个案例研究,即 "为农业转型做好准备的性别敏感研究人员"(GREAT)模式,该模式将男性特征纳入了女权主义教学法。我们使用了两个案例研究课程的外部监测、评估和学习数据,这些课程将性别问题融入了植物育种、种子系统和农艺学中,从而证明了将男性概念和对男性农民的期望、行为和实践的反思融入女性主义性别培训方法的有效性。我们的结论是,女性主义教学实践为性别培训如何融入男性视角提供了启示,从而超越分裂和狭隘的性别两极分化,解决往往阻碍实现性别转变的男性规范问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信