Nutrition Training in Medical Education Among Family Medicine Residents in North Carolina.

Q2 Medicine
Jeannie Sykes, Lisa Cassidy-Vu, Scott Richter, Michael Parker, Kehinde Eniola
{"title":"Nutrition Training in Medical Education Among Family Medicine Residents in North Carolina.","authors":"Jeannie Sykes, Lisa Cassidy-Vu, Scott Richter, Michael Parker, Kehinde Eniola","doi":"10.18043/001c.125103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study surveyed family medicine residents in North Carolina regarding the state of nutrition education in their residency training. In addition, the survey explored comfort levels with, and attitudes about, discussing nutrition with patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered an online questionnaire to family medicine residents in North Carolina (n = 384) asking about their history of nutrition training and their current attitudes about nutrition. The 24-item survey included both Yes and No and Likert-scale responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All but one resident had received formal or informal nutrition training during their medical education. Residents overwhelmingly considered nutrition to be an important component of health care, although a majority felt physicians are inadequately trained in nutrition. Feeling comfortable discussing nutrition with patients regarding specific health conditions varied from 45% (gastrointestinal concerns) to 94% (cardiovascular disease) or 95% (diabetes) among residents.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The volunteer sampling method used in the study may limit generalizability of the study findings to a broader population of family medicine residents. In addition, precisely defining \"formal\" and \"informal\" nutrition training on the survey questionnaire would help to clarify the role of nutrition education in shaping resident attitudes and practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that family medicine residents recognize the importance of nutrition education but do not feel adequately trained to provide it to patients. Given the abundance of evidence linking nutrition and health as well as an apparent interest among family medicine residents in nutrition education, this study supports the integration of nutrition training in medical education. Suggestions for how to accomplish this objective are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":39574,"journal":{"name":"North Carolina Medical Journal","volume":"85 6","pages":"439-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Carolina Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18043/001c.125103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study surveyed family medicine residents in North Carolina regarding the state of nutrition education in their residency training. In addition, the survey explored comfort levels with, and attitudes about, discussing nutrition with patients.

Methods: We administered an online questionnaire to family medicine residents in North Carolina (n = 384) asking about their history of nutrition training and their current attitudes about nutrition. The 24-item survey included both Yes and No and Likert-scale responses.

Results: All but one resident had received formal or informal nutrition training during their medical education. Residents overwhelmingly considered nutrition to be an important component of health care, although a majority felt physicians are inadequately trained in nutrition. Feeling comfortable discussing nutrition with patients regarding specific health conditions varied from 45% (gastrointestinal concerns) to 94% (cardiovascular disease) or 95% (diabetes) among residents.

Limitations: The volunteer sampling method used in the study may limit generalizability of the study findings to a broader population of family medicine residents. In addition, precisely defining "formal" and "informal" nutrition training on the survey questionnaire would help to clarify the role of nutrition education in shaping resident attitudes and practices.

Conclusion: This study shows that family medicine residents recognize the importance of nutrition education but do not feel adequately trained to provide it to patients. Given the abundance of evidence linking nutrition and health as well as an apparent interest among family medicine residents in nutrition education, this study supports the integration of nutrition training in medical education. Suggestions for how to accomplish this objective are provided.

北卡罗来纳州全科住院医师医学教育中的营养培训。
背景:本研究对北卡罗来纳州的全科住院医师进行了调查,了解他们在住院医师培训中接受营养教育的情况。此外,调查还探讨了与患者讨论营养问题的舒适度和态度:我们对北卡罗来纳州的全科住院医师(n = 384)进行了在线问卷调查,询问他们接受营养培训的历史以及目前对营养的态度。调查共 24 个项目,包括 "是"、"否 "和李克特量表回答:结果:除一名住院医师外,所有住院医师在医学教育期间都接受过正规或非正规的营养培训。绝大多数住院医师认为营养是医疗保健的重要组成部分,但大多数住院医师认为医生在营养方面的培训不足。住院医师在与患者讨论有关特定健康状况的营养问题时感到舒适的比例从 45%(肠胃问题)到 94%(心血管疾病)或 95%(糖尿病)不等:研究中使用的志愿者抽样方法可能会限制研究结果在更广泛的全科住院医师群体中的推广。此外,在调查问卷中准确定义 "正规 "和 "非正规 "营养培训将有助于明确营养教育在形成住院医师态度和实践中的作用:本研究表明,全科住院医师认识到营养教育的重要性,但认为没有接受过足够的培训来为患者提供营养教育。鉴于有大量证据表明营养与健康有关,而且全科住院医师对营养教育明显感兴趣,本研究支持将营养培训纳入医学教育。本研究还就如何实现这一目标提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
North Carolina Medical Journal
North Carolina Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: NCMJ, the North Carolina Medical Journal, is meant to be read by everyone with an interest in improving the health of North Carolinians. We seek to make the Journal a sounding board for new ideas, new approaches, and new policies that will deliver high quality health care, support healthy choices, and maintain a healthy environment in our state.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信