Association Between Tibiofemoral Bone Shape Features and Retears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241289096
Karsyn N Bailey, Kenneth T Gao, Ryan T Halvorson, Jacob F Oeding, Sharmila Majumdar, Valentina Pedoia, Drew A Lansdown
{"title":"Association Between Tibiofemoral Bone Shape Features and Retears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Karsyn N Bailey, Kenneth T Gao, Ryan T Halvorson, Jacob F Oeding, Sharmila Majumdar, Valentina Pedoia, Drew A Lansdown","doi":"10.1177/23259671241289096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A retear after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a common and devastating complication. Knee bone morphology is associated with the risk of ACL injuries, ACL retears, and osteoarthritis, and a combination of tools that derive bone shape from clinical imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and statistical shape modeling, could identify patients at risk of developing these joint conditions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify bone shape features before primary ACL reconstruction in patients with an eventual retear compared to those with a known intact ACL graft.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bone was automatically segmented on 2-dimensional proton density-weighted MRI of the knee in patients at the time of the initial ACL injury using deep convolutional neural networks. Patients with a subsequent retear after reconstruction within 3 years (22 femurs, 19 tibias) were compared with those with an intact ACL graft at 3 years (20 femurs, 22 tibias) using statistical shape modeling to identify preoperative bone shape features predictive of a retear after ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical shape modeling revealed 2 specific bone shape features (modes) in the femur and 1 mode in the tibia that demonstrated significant differences at the time of the initial injury in patients with subsequent retears. In the femur, a narrower intercondylar notch width, a widened medial condylar width, an increased femoral condylar offset ratio, increased surface area along the lateral femoral condyle relative to the medial condyle, and a more prominent trochlear sulcus at the time of the initial injury were associated with retears after ACL reconstruction. In the tibia, a diminished ACL facet prominence, a squared lateral and medial tibial plateaus, and a broader and flattened tibial spine at the time of the initial injury were associated with retears after ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the automatic bone segmentation pipeline on preoperative MRI, the authors identified bone shape features associated with a retear after ACL reconstruction. The use of this pipeline enables large-scale studies of bone shape on MRI and could predict patients at risk of ACL retears to alter treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241289096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241289096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A retear after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a common and devastating complication. Knee bone morphology is associated with the risk of ACL injuries, ACL retears, and osteoarthritis, and a combination of tools that derive bone shape from clinical imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and statistical shape modeling, could identify patients at risk of developing these joint conditions.

Purpose: To identify bone shape features before primary ACL reconstruction in patients with an eventual retear compared to those with a known intact ACL graft.

Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Bone was automatically segmented on 2-dimensional proton density-weighted MRI of the knee in patients at the time of the initial ACL injury using deep convolutional neural networks. Patients with a subsequent retear after reconstruction within 3 years (22 femurs, 19 tibias) were compared with those with an intact ACL graft at 3 years (20 femurs, 22 tibias) using statistical shape modeling to identify preoperative bone shape features predictive of a retear after ACL reconstruction.

Results: Statistical shape modeling revealed 2 specific bone shape features (modes) in the femur and 1 mode in the tibia that demonstrated significant differences at the time of the initial injury in patients with subsequent retears. In the femur, a narrower intercondylar notch width, a widened medial condylar width, an increased femoral condylar offset ratio, increased surface area along the lateral femoral condyle relative to the medial condyle, and a more prominent trochlear sulcus at the time of the initial injury were associated with retears after ACL reconstruction. In the tibia, a diminished ACL facet prominence, a squared lateral and medial tibial plateaus, and a broader and flattened tibial spine at the time of the initial injury were associated with retears after ACL reconstruction.

Conclusion: Using the automatic bone segmentation pipeline on preoperative MRI, the authors identified bone shape features associated with a retear after ACL reconstruction. The use of this pipeline enables large-scale studies of bone shape on MRI and could predict patients at risk of ACL retears to alter treatment decisions.

胫骨骨形特征与前交叉韧带重建术后骨撕裂之间的关系
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后的再撕裂仍然是一种常见的破坏性并发症。膝关节骨形态与前交叉韧带损伤、前交叉韧带再撕裂和骨关节炎的风险有关,而从临床成像中得出骨形态的工具(如磁共振成像(MRI)和统计形状建模)的组合可识别出有患这些关节疾病风险的患者。目的:与已知前交叉韧带移植物完好的患者相比,识别前交叉韧带初次重建前最终再撕裂患者的骨形态特征:研究设计:病例对照研究;证据级别:3:使用深度卷积神经网络对初次前交叉韧带损伤患者膝关节的二维质子密度加权核磁共振成像进行骨骼自动分割。通过统计形状建模,将重建后 3 年内发生再撕裂的患者(22 例股骨,19 例胫骨)与 3 年内前交叉韧带移植物完好无损的患者(20 例股骨,22 例胫骨)进行比较,以确定术前预测前交叉韧带重建后再撕裂的骨骼形状特征:统计形状模型显示,股骨和胫骨中分别有两种和一种特定的骨形状特征(模式),这些特征在最初受伤时与随后发生再撕裂的患者存在显著差异。在股骨中,髁间切迹宽度变窄、内侧髁宽度变宽、股骨髁偏移比增大、股骨外侧髁的表面积相对于内侧髁的表面积增大,以及最初受伤时髁沟更加突出,都与前交叉韧带重建后的再撕裂有关。在胫骨方面,最初受伤时前交叉韧带面突出减少、胫骨外侧和内侧平台呈方形、胫骨棘更宽且扁平与前交叉韧带重建后再撕裂有关:作者利用术前磁共振成像的自动骨骼分割管道,确定了与前交叉韧带重建术后再撕裂相关的骨骼形状特征。使用该管道可对核磁共振成像上的骨形状进行大规模研究,并可预测前交叉韧带再撕裂风险患者,从而改变治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信