Impact of a Criteria-Based Inpatient Palliative Oncology Consultation Model on End-of-Life Outcomes

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kathryn E. Norman MD , Mary K. Buss MD MPH , Kathleen A. Lee MD , Abigail Escobar BS , Jonathan Thomas MD , Julia Berg MD , Nsabimana Uwumugambi MD , Laura E. Dodge ScD MPH , Harry J. Han MD , Carol Pilgrim FNP-BC , Jonathan C. Yeh MD
{"title":"Impact of a Criteria-Based Inpatient Palliative Oncology Consultation Model on End-of-Life Outcomes","authors":"Kathryn E. Norman MD ,&nbsp;Mary K. Buss MD MPH ,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Abigail Escobar BS ,&nbsp;Jonathan Thomas MD ,&nbsp;Julia Berg MD ,&nbsp;Nsabimana Uwumugambi MD ,&nbsp;Laura E. Dodge ScD MPH ,&nbsp;Harry J. Han MD ,&nbsp;Carol Pilgrim FNP-BC ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Yeh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Early, integrated palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer; however, inpatient PC referrals still exceed outpatient referrals nationwide. Recognizing need for enhanced integration, our cancer center implemented a criteria-based PC consultation model in inpatient oncology.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare decedent outcomes pre- and postimplementation of a new criteria-based PC consultation model in inpatient oncology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We implemented an embedded, interdisciplinary “Palliative Oncology” consult team on the oncology floor. Admitted patients were screened for advanced/metastatic solid cancer or moderate/severe symptoms. The oncology team received prompting regarding eligible patients; PC referral remained at their discretion. We compared outcomes between patients who died pre- (10/1/2019-6/30/2020) and postimplementation (7/1/2020–6/30/2022) by t-test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 820 decedents, 186 died preintervention and 634 died postintervention. Postintervention, more decedents saw inpatient PC (59%–72%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and outpatient PC (23%–34%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and had earlier first PC visit before death (76–159 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Postintervention, fewer decedents had hospitalizations (71%–57%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and intensive care encounters (25%–17%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) within last 30 days of life. Hospice length-of-stay increased (22–36 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). There were trends toward fewer emergency room visits within last 30 days of life (51%–42%, <em>P</em> = 0.02), less systemic cancer therapy within last 14 days of life (9%–5%, <em>P</em> = 0.03), and more deaths at home (41%–50%, <em>P</em> = 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Embedded, criteria-based PC consultation in inpatient oncology was associated with earlier PC involvement, longer hospice LOS, and reduced EOL care intensity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 3","pages":"Pages 229-235.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424011266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Early, integrated palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer; however, inpatient PC referrals still exceed outpatient referrals nationwide. Recognizing need for enhanced integration, our cancer center implemented a criteria-based PC consultation model in inpatient oncology.

Objectives

To compare decedent outcomes pre- and postimplementation of a new criteria-based PC consultation model in inpatient oncology.

Methods

We implemented an embedded, interdisciplinary “Palliative Oncology” consult team on the oncology floor. Admitted patients were screened for advanced/metastatic solid cancer or moderate/severe symptoms. The oncology team received prompting regarding eligible patients; PC referral remained at their discretion. We compared outcomes between patients who died pre- (10/1/2019-6/30/2020) and postimplementation (7/1/2020–6/30/2022) by t-test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables).

Results

Of 820 decedents, 186 died preintervention and 634 died postintervention. Postintervention, more decedents saw inpatient PC (59%–72%, P < 0.001) and outpatient PC (23%–34%, P < 0.01), and had earlier first PC visit before death (76–159 days, P < 0.001). Postintervention, fewer decedents had hospitalizations (71%–57%, P < 0.001) and intensive care encounters (25%–17%, P < 0.01) within last 30 days of life. Hospice length-of-stay increased (22–36 days, P < 0.01). There were trends toward fewer emergency room visits within last 30 days of life (51%–42%, P = 0.02), less systemic cancer therapy within last 14 days of life (9%–5%, P = 0.03), and more deaths at home (41%–50%, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Embedded, criteria-based PC consultation in inpatient oncology was associated with earlier PC involvement, longer hospice LOS, and reduced EOL care intensity.
基于标准的肿瘤姑息治疗住院会诊模式对临终结局的影响。
背景:早期综合姑息治疗(PC)可改善晚期癌症患者的预后;然而,在全国范围内,住院患者的姑息治疗转诊量仍超过门诊转诊量。认识到需要加强整合,我们的癌症中心在住院肿瘤科实施了基于标准的姑息治疗咨询模式:比较在肿瘤科住院病人中实施基于标准的 PC 会诊新模式前后的病死结果:方法:我们在肿瘤科楼层实施了一个嵌入式跨学科 "姑息肿瘤学 "会诊团队。对入院患者进行晚期/转移性实体癌或中度/严重症状筛查。肿瘤科团队会收到关于符合条件的患者的提示;PC 转诊仍由他们自行决定。我们通过t检验(连续变量)和秩和检验(分类变量)比较了实施前(10/1/2019-6/30/2020)和实施后(7/1/2020-6/30/2022)死亡患者的结果:在 820 名死者中,186 人在干预前死亡,634 人在干预后死亡。干预后,更多的死者接受了住院PC咨询(59%到72%,P结论:在干预前,住院PC咨询的比例为59%,干预后为72%:在肿瘤科住院病人中嵌入基于标准的PC会诊与PC更早地参与、更长的安宁疗护生命期和更低的临终关怀强度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信