Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kevin I Duan, Canada Parrish, Anirban Basu, Brad Wright, Joshua M Liao, Karen E Joynt Maddox, William Kreuter, Amber K Sabbatini
{"title":"Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.","authors":"Kevin I Duan, Canada Parrish, Anirban Basu, Brad Wright, Joshua M Liao, Karen E Joynt Maddox, William Kreuter, Amber K Sabbatini","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09215-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observation stays in Medicare have grown over the last 15 years, yet limited research exists on how observation may impact outcomes for older adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship of an observation stay with 30-day hospital returns, total acute care days post-discharge, mortality, and out-of-pocket costs, compared to an inpatient admission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using instrumental variable analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries admitted to acute care with a length of stay < 5 days between 2009 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Observation stay vs inpatient admission.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Unplanned hospital return within 30 days, total 30-day post-discharge acute care days, 30-day mortality, and 30-day acute care out-of-pocket spending.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 3,958,377 hospitalizations met study criteria, of which 1,656,631 (42%) were observation stays and 2,301,746 (58%) were inpatient admissions. Compared to inpatient admissions, observation stays were associated with a 4.39 percentage point (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.56%, 5.22%) higher rate of 30-day unplanned hospital returns, but no difference in total 30-day post-discharge acute care days (difference - 0.02 days; 95% CI - 0.08, 0.03), no difference in 30-day mortality (difference 0.20 percentage points; 95% CI 0.00, 0.40), and lower 30-day out-of-pocket costs (difference - $552; 95% CI - $561, - $542).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for fewer than 5 days, observation stay was associated with higher rates of 30-day unplanned hospital returns compared to inpatient admission. However, we simultaneously observed lower out-of-pocket costs among those hospitalized under an observation stay. The mixed results suggest that additional research and engagement with relevant parties is needed to optimize observation stay policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09215-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Observation stays in Medicare have grown over the last 15 years, yet limited research exists on how observation may impact outcomes for older adults.

Objective: To examine the relationship of an observation stay with 30-day hospital returns, total acute care days post-discharge, mortality, and out-of-pocket costs, compared to an inpatient admission.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using instrumental variable analysis.

Participants: A 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries admitted to acute care with a length of stay < 5 days between 2009 and 2019.

Interventions: Observation stay vs inpatient admission.

Main measures: Unplanned hospital return within 30 days, total 30-day post-discharge acute care days, 30-day mortality, and 30-day acute care out-of-pocket spending.

Key results: A total of 3,958,377 hospitalizations met study criteria, of which 1,656,631 (42%) were observation stays and 2,301,746 (58%) were inpatient admissions. Compared to inpatient admissions, observation stays were associated with a 4.39 percentage point (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.56%, 5.22%) higher rate of 30-day unplanned hospital returns, but no difference in total 30-day post-discharge acute care days (difference - 0.02 days; 95% CI - 0.08, 0.03), no difference in 30-day mortality (difference 0.20 percentage points; 95% CI 0.00, 0.40), and lower 30-day out-of-pocket costs (difference - $552; 95% CI - $561, - $542).

Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for fewer than 5 days, observation stay was associated with higher rates of 30-day unplanned hospital returns compared to inpatient admission. However, we simultaneously observed lower out-of-pocket costs among those hospitalized under an observation stay. The mixed results suggest that additional research and engagement with relevant parties is needed to optimize observation stay policy.

医疗保险中观察住院与临床结果和成本的关系:工具变量分析。
背景:在过去 15 年中,医疗保险中的观察住院有所增加,但关于观察住院如何影响老年人预后的研究却很有限:研究观察住院与 30 天住院回报、出院后急症护理总天数、死亡率以及自付费用之间的关系:设计:使用工具变量分析法进行回顾性队列研究:干预措施:观察住院 VS 住院治疗:干预措施:观察住院与住院治疗:主要测量指标:30 天内非计划重返医院、出院后 30 天急症护理总天数、30 天死亡率和 30 天急症护理自付费用:共有 3,958,377 次住院符合研究标准,其中 1,656,631 次(42%)为观察住院,2,301,746 次(58%)为住院。与住院治疗相比,观察住院与 30 天非计划返院率高出 4.39 个百分点(95% 置信区间 [CI] 3.56%, 5.22%)有关,但出院后 30 天急症护理总天数没有差异(差异 - 0.02天;95% CI - 0.08, 0.03),30天死亡率无差异(差异0.20个百分点;95% CI 0.00, 0.40),30天自付费用较低(差异-552美元;95% CI - 561美元,-542美元):在住院少于 5 天的医疗保险受益人中,与住院相比,观察住院与较高的 30 天非计划返院率有关。然而,我们同时观察到,观察住院患者的自付费用较低。这些喜忧参半的结果表明,要优化观察住院政策,还需要进行更多的研究,并与相关方面进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信