The presentation and treatment of Dupuytren's disease in Dutch general practitioner care.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Roel J M van Straalen, Dieuwke C Broekstra, Paul M N Werker, Michiel R de Boer
{"title":"The presentation and treatment of Dupuytren's disease in Dutch general practitioner care.","authors":"Roel J M van Straalen, Dieuwke C Broekstra, Paul M N Werker, Michiel R de Boer","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When research and management of Dupuytren's disease (DD) shift from symptom relief to preventing contractures, general practitioner (GP) care may become more central to treatment. However, the presentation and course of DD in GP care are underexplored and this has been recognized as a knowledge gap that hinders effective treatment decisions. This study is the first to map the trajectory of DD patients in GP care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using electronic health records from Dutch general practices in a regional research network, we conducted a registration-based cohort study in a dynamic population. Descriptive statistics detailed patient demographics, number of contacts, and symptoms per contact. The time and number of contacts before diagnosis were also analysed. Sankey diagrams illustrated the relationship between management options and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 16-year period, 84% of patients with a DD diagnosis had visited their GP for this reason, with 73% only having one GP contact. The diagnosis was made at first contact for 93% of patients. Initial contacts often reported a lump (57.3%), but this symptom was less frequent in subsequent visits. 'Daily life impairment' increased after the first contact. The most common management options were referral to secondary care (37.7%) and watchful waiting (35.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis and management of DD in GP care are in line with the current guidelines. Less than half of the DD patients were referred to secondary care during follow-up. This may give room for preventive treatment that limits progression. Future studies should focus on the accuracy of diagnosis and the feasibility of effective treatments in GP care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When research and management of Dupuytren's disease (DD) shift from symptom relief to preventing contractures, general practitioner (GP) care may become more central to treatment. However, the presentation and course of DD in GP care are underexplored and this has been recognized as a knowledge gap that hinders effective treatment decisions. This study is the first to map the trajectory of DD patients in GP care.

Methods: Using electronic health records from Dutch general practices in a regional research network, we conducted a registration-based cohort study in a dynamic population. Descriptive statistics detailed patient demographics, number of contacts, and symptoms per contact. The time and number of contacts before diagnosis were also analysed. Sankey diagrams illustrated the relationship between management options and symptoms.

Results: Over a 16-year period, 84% of patients with a DD diagnosis had visited their GP for this reason, with 73% only having one GP contact. The diagnosis was made at first contact for 93% of patients. Initial contacts often reported a lump (57.3%), but this symptom was less frequent in subsequent visits. 'Daily life impairment' increased after the first contact. The most common management options were referral to secondary care (37.7%) and watchful waiting (35.1%).

Conclusion: The diagnosis and management of DD in GP care are in line with the current guidelines. Less than half of the DD patients were referred to secondary care during follow-up. This may give room for preventive treatment that limits progression. Future studies should focus on the accuracy of diagnosis and the feasibility of effective treatments in GP care.

荷兰全科医生对杜普伊特伦氏病的介绍和治疗。
背景:当对杜普伊特伦氏病(DD)的研究和管理从缓解症状转向预防挛缩时,全科医生(GP)护理可能会成为治疗的核心。然而,人们对全科医生护理中的杜普伊特伦氏病表现和病程探索不足,这已被认为是阻碍有效治疗决策的知识空白。本研究首次绘制了DD患者在全科医生护理中的病程轨迹:方法:我们利用区域研究网络中荷兰全科医生的电子健康记录,对动态人群进行了基于登记的队列研究。描述性统计详细描述了患者的人口统计学特征、接触次数和每次接触的症状。我们还分析了确诊前的接触时间和次数。桑基图说明了治疗方案与症状之间的关系:在 16 年间,84% 的 DD 诊断患者曾因此就诊于全科医生,其中 73% 的患者只接触过一次全科医生。93%的患者在首次就诊时就得到了诊断。初次就诊的患者通常会报告有肿块(57.3%),但这种症状在随后的就诊中出现的频率较低。首次就诊后,"日常生活障碍 "有所增加。最常见的处理方案是转诊至二级医疗机构(37.7%)和观察等待(35.1%):结论:全科医生对 DD 的诊断和管理符合现行指南。结论:全科医生对 DD 的诊断和处理符合现行指南的要求。在随访过程中,不到一半的 DD 患者被转诊至二级医疗机构。这可能为限制病情发展的预防性治疗提供了空间。今后的研究应重点关注全科医生护理中诊断的准确性和有效治疗的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信