Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bohan Fan, Junmeng Zhang, Jie V Zhao
{"title":"Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs.","authors":"Bohan Fan, Junmeng Zhang, Jie V Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03760-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We systematically reviewed Mendelian randomization (MR) studies and summarized evidence on the potential effects of different antihypertensive drugs on health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Embase for MR studies evaluating the effects of antihypertensive drug classes on health outcomes until 22 May 2024. We extracted data on study characteristics and findings, assessed study quality, and compared the evidence with that from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2643 studies in the search, of which 37 studies were included. These studies explored a wide range of health outcomes including cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, immune function and infection, and other outcomes. There is strong evidence supporting the protective effects of genetically proxied antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular diseases. We found strong protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on diabetes whereas beta-blockers showed adverse effects. ACE inhibitors might increase the risk of psoriasis, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease but did not affect COVID-19. There is strong evidence that ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are beneficial for kidney and immune function, and CCBs showed a safe profile for disorders of pregnancy. Most studies have high quality. RCT evidence supports the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on stroke, diabetes, and kidney function. However, there is a lack of reliable RCTs to confirm the associations with other diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of the benefits and off-target effects of antihypertensive drugs contribute to clinical decision-making, pharmacovigilance, and the identification of drug repurposing opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"547"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03760-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We systematically reviewed Mendelian randomization (MR) studies and summarized evidence on the potential effects of different antihypertensive drugs on health.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for MR studies evaluating the effects of antihypertensive drug classes on health outcomes until 22 May 2024. We extracted data on study characteristics and findings, assessed study quality, and compared the evidence with that from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: We identified 2643 studies in the search, of which 37 studies were included. These studies explored a wide range of health outcomes including cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, immune function and infection, and other outcomes. There is strong evidence supporting the protective effects of genetically proxied antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular diseases. We found strong protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on diabetes whereas beta-blockers showed adverse effects. ACE inhibitors might increase the risk of psoriasis, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease but did not affect COVID-19. There is strong evidence that ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are beneficial for kidney and immune function, and CCBs showed a safe profile for disorders of pregnancy. Most studies have high quality. RCT evidence supports the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on stroke, diabetes, and kidney function. However, there is a lack of reliable RCTs to confirm the associations with other diseases.

Conclusions: Evidence of the benefits and off-target effects of antihypertensive drugs contribute to clinical decision-making, pharmacovigilance, and the identification of drug repurposing opportunities.

关于抗高血压药物的孟德尔随机研究的系统回顾。
背景:我们系统地回顾了孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,并总结了不同降压药对健康潜在影响的证据:我们检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 中截至 2024 年 5 月 22 日评估降压药对健康影响的 MR 研究。我们提取了有关研究特征和结果的数据,评估了研究质量,并将证据与随机对照试验(RCT)的证据进行了比较:结果:我们在搜索中发现了 2643 项研究,其中 37 项研究被纳入。这些研究探讨了广泛的健康结果,包括心血管疾病及其风险因素、精神和神经退行性疾病、癌症、免疫功能和感染以及其他结果。有强有力的证据支持基因替代降压药对心血管疾病的保护作用。我们发现血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂对糖尿病有很强的保护作用,而β-受体阻滞剂则有不利影响。血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可能会增加牛皮癣、精神分裂症和阿尔茨海默病的患病风险,但不会影响 COVID-19。有确凿证据表明,ACE 抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)对肾脏和免疫功能有益,而且 CCBs 对妊娠紊乱有安全作用。大多数研究的质量都很高。RCT 证据支持 ACE 抑制剂和 CCBs 对中风、糖尿病和肾功能的有益作用。然而,缺乏可靠的 RCT 研究来证实与其他疾病的关联:有关降压药物的益处和非靶向效应的证据有助于临床决策、药物警戒和确定药物再利用的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信