Austin Oberlin, Katherine Yoh, Eve Overton, Whitney Alexandra Booker, John Ilagan, Dib Sassine, Alexandra Diggs, Sherelle Laifer-Narin, Adela Cimic, Laruence Ring, Maria Sheikh, Caryn St Clair, June Hou, Alexandre Buckley de Meritens, Jason D Wright, Mary D'Alton, Chia-Ling Nhan Chang, Mirella Mourad, Fady Khoury Collado
{"title":"Transverse versus vertical incision in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum.","authors":"Austin Oberlin, Katherine Yoh, Eve Overton, Whitney Alexandra Booker, John Ilagan, Dib Sassine, Alexandra Diggs, Sherelle Laifer-Narin, Adela Cimic, Laruence Ring, Maria Sheikh, Caryn St Clair, June Hou, Alexandre Buckley de Meritens, Jason D Wright, Mary D'Alton, Chia-Ling Nhan Chang, Mirella Mourad, Fady Khoury Collado","doi":"10.1055/a-2479-2604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>Traditionally, midline vertical skin incisions have been utilized during surgery for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as it is considered to maximize exposure and allow for a uterine incision to avoid the placenta. However, literature directly comparing outcomes of vertical versus transverse incisions in PAS is sparse. Our objective was to compare maternal outcomes between patients who underwent a vertical versus a transverse skin incision for PAS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PAS undergoing scheduled surgery at our institution between 09/2019 and 11/2023. Starting in 10/2021, select patients were offered a transverse skin approach. Patients were eligible if the surgery was scheduled, and the placenta was not entirely covering the anterior uterine wall. The transverse skin incision was approximately 18-20cm and used the patient's prior scar. Primary outcomes included rate of maternal transfusion >4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), the incidence of surgical complications, and the need for conversion to general anesthesia (GETA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients underwent scheduled surgery for PAS. Thirty-three patients had a vertical skin incision, and 37 had a transverse incision. After initiation of the transverse incision approach, 37/43 (86.0%) had a transverse incision and none required conversion to a vertical incision intraoperatively. The two groups were similar with regard to age, BMI, and severity of PAS. There was no difference in the rate of transfusion of >4 units of PRBC (vertical 12% vs transverse 22%, p=0.29), or in the rate of intraoperative complications (i.e., cystotomy; vertical 3% vs transverse 14%, p= 0.20). In patients with a transverse incision, a significantly lower number of patients required conversion to GETA intraoperatively (vertical 70% vs transverse 24%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In appropriately selected patients, a transverse skin incision was associated with lower conversion to GETA without any difference in intraoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-2604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective(s): Traditionally, midline vertical skin incisions have been utilized during surgery for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as it is considered to maximize exposure and allow for a uterine incision to avoid the placenta. However, literature directly comparing outcomes of vertical versus transverse incisions in PAS is sparse. Our objective was to compare maternal outcomes between patients who underwent a vertical versus a transverse skin incision for PAS.
Study design: Retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PAS undergoing scheduled surgery at our institution between 09/2019 and 11/2023. Starting in 10/2021, select patients were offered a transverse skin approach. Patients were eligible if the surgery was scheduled, and the placenta was not entirely covering the anterior uterine wall. The transverse skin incision was approximately 18-20cm and used the patient's prior scar. Primary outcomes included rate of maternal transfusion >4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), the incidence of surgical complications, and the need for conversion to general anesthesia (GETA).
Results: Seventy patients underwent scheduled surgery for PAS. Thirty-three patients had a vertical skin incision, and 37 had a transverse incision. After initiation of the transverse incision approach, 37/43 (86.0%) had a transverse incision and none required conversion to a vertical incision intraoperatively. The two groups were similar with regard to age, BMI, and severity of PAS. There was no difference in the rate of transfusion of >4 units of PRBC (vertical 12% vs transverse 22%, p=0.29), or in the rate of intraoperative complications (i.e., cystotomy; vertical 3% vs transverse 14%, p= 0.20). In patients with a transverse incision, a significantly lower number of patients required conversion to GETA intraoperatively (vertical 70% vs transverse 24%, p<0.001).
Conclusion: In appropriately selected patients, a transverse skin incision was associated with lower conversion to GETA without any difference in intraoperative outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.