Transverse versus vertical incision in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Austin Oberlin, Katherine Yoh, Eve Overton, Whitney Alexandra Booker, John Ilagan, Dib Sassine, Alexandra Diggs, Sherelle Laifer-Narin, Adela Cimic, Laruence Ring, Maria Sheikh, Caryn St Clair, June Hou, Alexandre Buckley de Meritens, Jason D Wright, Mary D'Alton, Chia-Ling Nhan Chang, Mirella Mourad, Fady Khoury Collado
{"title":"Transverse versus vertical incision in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum.","authors":"Austin Oberlin, Katherine Yoh, Eve Overton, Whitney Alexandra Booker, John Ilagan, Dib Sassine, Alexandra Diggs, Sherelle Laifer-Narin, Adela Cimic, Laruence Ring, Maria Sheikh, Caryn St Clair, June Hou, Alexandre Buckley de Meritens, Jason D Wright, Mary D'Alton, Chia-Ling Nhan Chang, Mirella Mourad, Fady Khoury Collado","doi":"10.1055/a-2479-2604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>Traditionally, midline vertical skin incisions have been utilized during surgery for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as it is considered to maximize exposure and allow for a uterine incision to avoid the placenta. However, literature directly comparing outcomes of vertical versus transverse incisions in PAS is sparse. Our objective was to compare maternal outcomes between patients who underwent a vertical versus a transverse skin incision for PAS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PAS undergoing scheduled surgery at our institution between 09/2019 and 11/2023. Starting in 10/2021, select patients were offered a transverse skin approach. Patients were eligible if the surgery was scheduled, and the placenta was not entirely covering the anterior uterine wall. The transverse skin incision was approximately 18-20cm and used the patient's prior scar. Primary outcomes included rate of maternal transfusion >4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), the incidence of surgical complications, and the need for conversion to general anesthesia (GETA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients underwent scheduled surgery for PAS. Thirty-three patients had a vertical skin incision, and 37 had a transverse incision. After initiation of the transverse incision approach, 37/43 (86.0%) had a transverse incision and none required conversion to a vertical incision intraoperatively. The two groups were similar with regard to age, BMI, and severity of PAS. There was no difference in the rate of transfusion of >4 units of PRBC (vertical 12% vs transverse 22%, p=0.29), or in the rate of intraoperative complications (i.e., cystotomy; vertical 3% vs transverse 14%, p= 0.20). In patients with a transverse incision, a significantly lower number of patients required conversion to GETA intraoperatively (vertical 70% vs transverse 24%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In appropriately selected patients, a transverse skin incision was associated with lower conversion to GETA without any difference in intraoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-2604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s): Traditionally, midline vertical skin incisions have been utilized during surgery for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as it is considered to maximize exposure and allow for a uterine incision to avoid the placenta. However, literature directly comparing outcomes of vertical versus transverse incisions in PAS is sparse. Our objective was to compare maternal outcomes between patients who underwent a vertical versus a transverse skin incision for PAS.

Study design: Retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PAS undergoing scheduled surgery at our institution between 09/2019 and 11/2023. Starting in 10/2021, select patients were offered a transverse skin approach. Patients were eligible if the surgery was scheduled, and the placenta was not entirely covering the anterior uterine wall. The transverse skin incision was approximately 18-20cm and used the patient's prior scar. Primary outcomes included rate of maternal transfusion >4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), the incidence of surgical complications, and the need for conversion to general anesthesia (GETA).

Results: Seventy patients underwent scheduled surgery for PAS. Thirty-three patients had a vertical skin incision, and 37 had a transverse incision. After initiation of the transverse incision approach, 37/43 (86.0%) had a transverse incision and none required conversion to a vertical incision intraoperatively. The two groups were similar with regard to age, BMI, and severity of PAS. There was no difference in the rate of transfusion of >4 units of PRBC (vertical 12% vs transverse 22%, p=0.29), or in the rate of intraoperative complications (i.e., cystotomy; vertical 3% vs transverse 14%, p= 0.20). In patients with a transverse incision, a significantly lower number of patients required conversion to GETA intraoperatively (vertical 70% vs transverse 24%, p<0.001).

Conclusion: In appropriately selected patients, a transverse skin incision was associated with lower conversion to GETA without any difference in intraoperative outcomes.

横切与纵切在胎盘早剥手术治疗中的应用。
目的:传统上,中线垂直皮肤切口被用于胎盘早剥术(PAS),因为这种切口被认为能最大限度地暴露胎盘,并允许子宫切口避开胎盘。然而,直接比较垂直切口与横向切口在 PAS 中的疗效的文献并不多见。我们的目的是比较垂直与横向皮肤切口 PAS 患者的产妇预后:对2019年9月至2023年11月期间在我院接受预定手术的病理确诊PAS患者进行回顾性审查。从 2021 年 10 月开始,我们为部分患者提供了横向皮肤切口。如果手术已排期,且胎盘未完全覆盖子宫前壁,则患者符合条件。横向皮肤切口约 18-20 厘米,使用患者之前的疤痕。主要结果包括产妇输血量大于 4 单位包装红细胞(PRBC)的比率、手术并发症的发生率以及是否需要转为全身麻醉(GETA):70名患者接受了PAS预定手术。33名患者采用垂直皮肤切口,37名患者采用横向切口。在开始采用横向切口方法后,37/43(86.0%)的患者采用了横向切口,没有人需要在术中转为垂直切口。两组患者的年龄、体重指数和 PAS 严重程度相似。两组患者输注大于 4 个单位 PRBC 的比例(纵切口 12% 对横切口 22%,P=0.29)和术中并发症(即膀胱切开术;纵切口 3% 对横切口 14%,P=0.20)没有差异。在采用横切口的患者中,术中需要转为 GETA 的患者人数明显较少(垂直切口 70% 对横切口 24%,P=0.29):在经过适当选择的患者中,横向皮肤切口与较低的 GETA 转归率相关,但术中结果没有任何差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信