Short and Medium Chain Fatty Acids in a Cohort of Naïve Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Pre- and Post-Interferon Beta Treatment Assessment.

IF 5.3 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biologics : Targets & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BTT.S489523
Laura Barcutean, Lenard Farczadi, Ion-Bogdan Manescu, Silvia Imre, Smaranda Maier, Rodica Balasa
{"title":"Short and Medium Chain Fatty Acids in a Cohort of Naïve Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Pre- and Post-Interferon Beta Treatment Assessment.","authors":"Laura Barcutean, Lenard Farczadi, Ion-Bogdan Manescu, Silvia Imre, Smaranda Maier, Rodica Balasa","doi":"10.2147/BTT.S489523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alterations in intestinal permeability and microbiota dysregulation have been linked to the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) are products of gut bacteria fermentation which are involved in immune regulation processes. In MS, SCFA have important immunomodulatory properties both in the periphery and the central compartment. Interferon β (IFNβ) was the first disease-modifying therapy approved for the treatment of MS and its effects on the gut microbiota are not fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a prospective observational study aimed to assess peripheral levels of SCFA and MCFA in 23 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve MS patients (nMS) before and after one year of IFNβ treatment and 23 healthy controls (HC). We investigated their associations with inflammation, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and blood-brain barrier permeability, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in SCFA/MCFA levels were observed between baseline and after IFNβ treatment. Caproic acid levels were significantly higher in nMS compared to HC (1.64 vs 1.27 µM, p=0.005). The butyric acid/caproic acid ratio was higher in HC compared to nMS (5.47 vs 2.55, p=0.005). Correlation analysis revealed associations between SCFA/MCFA levels and inflammatory biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>nMS have a higher gut-inflammatory activity as seen by the caproic acid ratio as opposed to HC. In this cohort, IFNβ does not appear to modify the peripheral SCFA/MCFA levels after one year of treatment. The quantifications of peripheral SCFA/MCFA may prove to be a useful biomarker for gut-brain axis disruption in MS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9025,"journal":{"name":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"349-361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S489523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alterations in intestinal permeability and microbiota dysregulation have been linked to the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) are products of gut bacteria fermentation which are involved in immune regulation processes. In MS, SCFA have important immunomodulatory properties both in the periphery and the central compartment. Interferon β (IFNβ) was the first disease-modifying therapy approved for the treatment of MS and its effects on the gut microbiota are not fully elucidated.

Patients and methods: We performed a prospective observational study aimed to assess peripheral levels of SCFA and MCFA in 23 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve MS patients (nMS) before and after one year of IFNβ treatment and 23 healthy controls (HC). We investigated their associations with inflammation, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and blood-brain barrier permeability, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9).

Results: No significant differences in SCFA/MCFA levels were observed between baseline and after IFNβ treatment. Caproic acid levels were significantly higher in nMS compared to HC (1.64 vs 1.27 µM, p=0.005). The butyric acid/caproic acid ratio was higher in HC compared to nMS (5.47 vs 2.55, p=0.005). Correlation analysis revealed associations between SCFA/MCFA levels and inflammatory biomarkers.

Conclusion: nMS have a higher gut-inflammatory activity as seen by the caproic acid ratio as opposed to HC. In this cohort, IFNβ does not appear to modify the peripheral SCFA/MCFA levels after one year of treatment. The quantifications of peripheral SCFA/MCFA may prove to be a useful biomarker for gut-brain axis disruption in MS patients.

一组新发多发性硬化症患者体内的中短链脂肪酸:干扰素 Beta 治疗前后的评估。
导言:肠道渗透性的改变和微生物群的失调与多发性硬化症(MS)的发病有关。短链脂肪酸(SCFA)和中链脂肪酸(MCFA)是肠道细菌发酵的产物,参与免疫调节过程。在多发性硬化症中,SCFA 在外周和中心区都具有重要的免疫调节特性。干扰素β(IFNβ)是首个获准用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病调节疗法,但其对肠道微生物群的影响尚未完全阐明:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,旨在评估 23 名新诊断的、未经治疗的多发性硬化症患者(nMS)和 23 名健康对照者(HC)在接受 IFNβ 治疗一年前后的外周 SCFA 和 MCFA 水平。我们研究了它们与炎症、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)和血脑屏障通透性、基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP9)的关系:结果:SCFA/MCFA水平在基线和IFNβ治疗后无明显差异。与 HC 相比,nMS 的己酸水平明显更高(1.64 vs 1.27 µM,p=0.005)。与 nMS 相比,HC 中的丁酸/己酸比率更高(5.47 vs 2.55,p=0.005)。相关分析显示 SCFA/MCFA 水平与炎症生物标志物之间存在关联。在该研究组中,IFNβ似乎不会在治疗一年后改变外周SCFA/MCFA水平。外周 SCFA/MCFA 的定量可能被证明是多发性硬化症患者肠脑轴紊乱的有用生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologics : Targets & Therapy
Biologics : Targets & Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信