Effects of Different Irrigation and Fertilization Levels on the Yield and Quality of Wet Sugar Beet Pulp Used as Animal Feed

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Serhat Ayas
{"title":"Effects of Different Irrigation and Fertilization Levels on the Yield and Quality of Wet Sugar Beet Pulp Used as Animal Feed","authors":"Serhat Ayas","doi":"10.1007/s12355-024-01490-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of different irrigation and fertilization levels on the yield and quality of wet sugar beet pulp used as animal feed in the 2019–2020 period. While the yield and quality analyses of sugar beet and the wet sugar beet pulp obtained from it were carried out in Yenişehir College Laboratories and Food and Feed Control Center Research Institute, Bursa, Turkey, BUÜ Yenişehir College Agricultural Production Area was chosen as the research area. In order to determine the effect of the irrigation-fertilization interaction on sugar beet and the wet sugar beet pulp obtained from it, four different irrigation and three fertilization treatments were determined and a total of twelve study treatments were created. In the research, drip irrigation systems were preferred in order to carry out irrigation and fertilization applications in a controlled manner. The amount of plant water consumption (ET) was calculated with the water balance equation (I + P − Dp ± ΔSW). Irrigation water amounts were determined as 800.0–200.0 mm and 820.0–205.0 mm, respectively. ET values were determined as 530.0–228.5 mm and 552.0–340.8 mm, respectively. While sugar beet root yield values in the 2019–2020 research years were determined as 112.0–110.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and 40.7–40.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, wet sugar beet pulp by-product yield rates varied between 49.8–50.3% and 39.6–39.4%. When the dual interaction of irrigation-fertilization factors and the yield and quality losses of sugar beet roots and fresh pulp as a by-product are evaluated together, the I<sub>75</sub>F<sub>75</sub> issue should be preferred. As a result, the importance of obtaining sugar from sugar beet roots and using the chemical content of the pulp obtained as a by-product as animal feed has been tried to be revealed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"26 5","pages":"1448 - 1462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-024-01490-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of different irrigation and fertilization levels on the yield and quality of wet sugar beet pulp used as animal feed in the 2019–2020 period. While the yield and quality analyses of sugar beet and the wet sugar beet pulp obtained from it were carried out in Yenişehir College Laboratories and Food and Feed Control Center Research Institute, Bursa, Turkey, BUÜ Yenişehir College Agricultural Production Area was chosen as the research area. In order to determine the effect of the irrigation-fertilization interaction on sugar beet and the wet sugar beet pulp obtained from it, four different irrigation and three fertilization treatments were determined and a total of twelve study treatments were created. In the research, drip irrigation systems were preferred in order to carry out irrigation and fertilization applications in a controlled manner. The amount of plant water consumption (ET) was calculated with the water balance equation (I + P − Dp ± ΔSW). Irrigation water amounts were determined as 800.0–200.0 mm and 820.0–205.0 mm, respectively. ET values were determined as 530.0–228.5 mm and 552.0–340.8 mm, respectively. While sugar beet root yield values in the 2019–2020 research years were determined as 112.0–110.0 t ha−1 and 40.7–40.5 t ha−1, respectively, wet sugar beet pulp by-product yield rates varied between 49.8–50.3% and 39.6–39.4%. When the dual interaction of irrigation-fertilization factors and the yield and quality losses of sugar beet roots and fresh pulp as a by-product are evaluated together, the I75F75 issue should be preferred. As a result, the importance of obtaining sugar from sugar beet roots and using the chemical content of the pulp obtained as a by-product as animal feed has been tried to be revealed.

不同灌溉和施肥水平对用作动物饲料的湿甜菜浆的产量和质量的影响
本研究的目的是调查不同灌溉和施肥水平对 2019-2020 年用作动物饲料的甜菜湿浆的产量和质量的影响。在土耳其布尔萨耶尼谢希尔学院实验室和食品与饲料控制中心研究所对甜菜和甜菜湿浆的产量和质量进行了分析,并选择布尔萨耶尼谢希尔学院农业生产区作为研究区域。为了确定灌溉-施肥交互作用对甜菜及其湿甜菜浆的影响,确定了四种不同的灌溉处理和三种施肥处理,共十二种研究处理。研究采用滴灌系统,以控制灌溉和施肥。植物耗水量(ET)通过水平衡方程(I + P - Dp ± ΔSW)计算得出。灌溉水量分别确定为 800.0-200.0 毫米和 820.0-205.0 毫米。蒸散发值分别为 530.0-228.5 毫米和 552.0-340.8 毫米。2019-2020研究年度甜菜根产量值分别确定为112.0-110.0吨/公顷和40.7-40.5吨/公顷,湿甜菜浆副产品产量率在49.8-50.3%和39.6-39.4%之间变化。在综合评估灌溉施肥因素与甜菜根和作为副产品的鲜浆的产量和质量损失的双重相互作用时,应优先考虑 I75F75 问题。因此,从甜菜根中获取糖分并利用作为副产品的纸浆中的化学成分作为动物饲料的重要性已经得到了尝试性的揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信