Restored legume acts as a “nurse” to facilitate plant compensatory growth and biomass production in mown grasslands

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Meiqi Guo, Tongtian Guo, Jiqiong Zhou, Junyi Liang, Gaowen Yang, Yingjun Zhang
{"title":"Restored legume acts as a “nurse” to facilitate plant compensatory growth and biomass production in mown grasslands","authors":"Meiqi Guo,&nbsp;Tongtian Guo,&nbsp;Jiqiong Zhou,&nbsp;Junyi Liang,&nbsp;Gaowen Yang,&nbsp;Yingjun Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00994-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anthropogenic disturbances have led to substantial declines in grassland legumes worldwide, with consequences for plant nutritional quality, biodiversity, food-web complexity, and ecosystem sustainability. Despite the growing acknowledgment of the significance of legume presence, it has rarely been investigated how the introduction of legumes affects the growth of neighboring plants over time and the underlying mechanisms that influence biomass production during grassland utilization. To address these gaps, we established legume-restored grasslands followed by 7 years of mowing (once a year) and phosphorus (P) application to simulate defoliation management and improve legume performance. We observed significant higher compensatory growth rate and aboveground biomass in legume-restored grasslands compared to naturally restored grasslands. These improvements can be attributed to the combined effect of an increase in legume proportion in plant communities and the improved performance of neighboring plant species after legume restoration (nursing effect). This nursing effect further increased the relative importance of the mass ratio effect in explaining the improved biomass in legume-restored grasslands after mowing. Moreover, the compensatory growth rate in naturally restored grasslands decreased significantly over time, while the compensatory growth rate in legume-restored grasslands tended to increase, indicating higher sustainable biomass production in legume-restored grasslands. P application increased aboveground biomass, but did not alter plant community structure, regardless of whether legumes were used to restore grasslands. Here, we show for the first time that legume introduction can sustainably provide higher biomass production through enhancing compensatory growth in natural grasslands that have suffered from prolonged or intense defoliation. This highlights the critical role of leguminous species in a long-term grassland restoration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00994-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbances have led to substantial declines in grassland legumes worldwide, with consequences for plant nutritional quality, biodiversity, food-web complexity, and ecosystem sustainability. Despite the growing acknowledgment of the significance of legume presence, it has rarely been investigated how the introduction of legumes affects the growth of neighboring plants over time and the underlying mechanisms that influence biomass production during grassland utilization. To address these gaps, we established legume-restored grasslands followed by 7 years of mowing (once a year) and phosphorus (P) application to simulate defoliation management and improve legume performance. We observed significant higher compensatory growth rate and aboveground biomass in legume-restored grasslands compared to naturally restored grasslands. These improvements can be attributed to the combined effect of an increase in legume proportion in plant communities and the improved performance of neighboring plant species after legume restoration (nursing effect). This nursing effect further increased the relative importance of the mass ratio effect in explaining the improved biomass in legume-restored grasslands after mowing. Moreover, the compensatory growth rate in naturally restored grasslands decreased significantly over time, while the compensatory growth rate in legume-restored grasslands tended to increase, indicating higher sustainable biomass production in legume-restored grasslands. P application increased aboveground biomass, but did not alter plant community structure, regardless of whether legumes were used to restore grasslands. Here, we show for the first time that legume introduction can sustainably provide higher biomass production through enhancing compensatory growth in natural grasslands that have suffered from prolonged or intense defoliation. This highlights the critical role of leguminous species in a long-term grassland restoration.

恢复的豆科植物充当 "护士",促进刈割草地的植物补偿生长和生物量生产
人为干扰导致全球草地豆科植物大量减少,对植物营养质量、生物多样性、食物网复杂性和生态系统可持续性造成了影响。尽管人们越来越认识到豆科植物存在的重要性,但很少有人研究过豆科植物的引入如何随着时间的推移影响邻近植物的生长,以及在草地利用过程中影响生物量生产的潜在机制。为了填补这些空白,我们建立了豆科植物恢复的草地,然后进行为期 7 年的除草(每年一次)和施磷,以模拟落叶管理并提高豆科植物的表现。我们观察到,与自然恢复的草地相比,豆科植物恢复草地的补偿生长率和地上生物量明显更高。这些改善可归因于植物群落中豆科植物比例的增加以及豆科植物恢复后邻近植物物种表现的改善(哺育效应)。这种哺育效应进一步提高了质量比效应在解释刈割后豆科植物恢复草地生物量提高的相对重要性。此外,随着时间的推移,自然恢复草地的补偿生长率显著下降,而豆科植物恢复草地的补偿生长率呈上升趋势,这表明豆科植物恢复草地的可持续生物量产量更高。无论是否使用豆科植物恢复草地,施用磷都会增加地上生物量,但不会改变植物群落结构。在这里,我们首次证明,在遭受长期或严重落叶的天然草地上,引入豆科植物可以通过增强补偿生长,持续提供更高的生物量。这凸显了豆科物种在长期草原恢复中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信