Cost-utility of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: results of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mathieu Marx, Michaël Mounié, Isabelle Mosnier, Frédéric Venail, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, David Bakhos, Emmanuel Lescanne, Yann N'Guyen, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Benoit Godey, Gwenaëlle Creff, Sébastien Schmerber, Nicolas-Xavier Bonne, Christophe Vincent, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Nadège Costa
{"title":"Cost-utility of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: results of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mathieu Marx, Michaël Mounié, Isabelle Mosnier, Frédéric Venail, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, David Bakhos, Emmanuel Lescanne, Yann N'Guyen, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Benoit Godey, Gwenaëlle Creff, Sébastien Schmerber, Nicolas-Xavier Bonne, Christophe Vincent, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Nadège Costa","doi":"10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of cochlear implantation in the treatment of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter pragmatic study including a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 155 subjects with SSD or AHL. Subjects chose a treatment option between: abstention, Contralateral Routing Of the Signal hearing aids, Bone Conduction Device or Cochlear Implant (CI). Participants who opted for CI were then randomized between two arms: \"immediate CI\" where the cochlear implantation was performed within one month and \"initial observation\" where subjects were first observed. The ICUR of CI was determined at 6 months follow-up by comparing the two arms. Utility was measured using EuroQoL- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), to calculate the gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Individual costs were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. A Markovian MultiState (MMS) model assessed the ICUR evolution over the lifetime horizon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 155 included participants, 51 opted for a CI and were randomized. For a 6 months follow-up period, the ICUR was €422,279/QALY gained after CI. Using the MMS model, the ICUR of CI decreased to €57,561/QALY at 10 years follow-up, €38,006/QALY at 20 years, and dropped to €26,715 at 50 years. In the participants with severe tinnitus, mean ICUR was €31,105/QALY at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI can be considered as an efficient treatment in SSD and AHL from 20 years follow-up in the global population, and before 10 years follow-up in patients with severe associated tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of cochlear implantation in the treatment of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).

Methods: This prospective multicenter pragmatic study including a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 155 subjects with SSD or AHL. Subjects chose a treatment option between: abstention, Contralateral Routing Of the Signal hearing aids, Bone Conduction Device or Cochlear Implant (CI). Participants who opted for CI were then randomized between two arms: "immediate CI" where the cochlear implantation was performed within one month and "initial observation" where subjects were first observed. The ICUR of CI was determined at 6 months follow-up by comparing the two arms. Utility was measured using EuroQoL- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), to calculate the gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Individual costs were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. A Markovian MultiState (MMS) model assessed the ICUR evolution over the lifetime horizon.

Results: Among the 155 included participants, 51 opted for a CI and were randomized. For a 6 months follow-up period, the ICUR was €422,279/QALY gained after CI. Using the MMS model, the ICUR of CI decreased to €57,561/QALY at 10 years follow-up, €38,006/QALY at 20 years, and dropped to €26,715 at 50 years. In the participants with severe tinnitus, mean ICUR was €31,105/QALY at 10 years.

Conclusions: CI can be considered as an efficient treatment in SSD and AHL from 20 years follow-up in the global population, and before 10 years follow-up in patients with severe associated tinnitus.

单侧耳聋和不对称听力损失的人工耳蜗植入成本效益:随机对照试验结果。
目的确定人工耳蜗植入治疗单侧耳聋(SSD)和非对称听力损失(AHL)成年患者的增量成本效用比(ICUR):这项前瞻性多中心实用研究包括一项随机对照试验(RCT),共招募了 155 名单侧耳聋或非对称听力损失患者。受试者在以下治疗方案中选择一种:放弃治疗、助听器信号对侧路由、骨传导设备或人工耳蜗(CI)。选择 CI 的受试者被随机分为两组:"立即植入人工耳蜗 "组在一个月内植入人工耳蜗,而 "初始观察 "组则首先对受试者进行观察。随访 6 个月时,通过比较两组受试者的情况,确定 CI 的 ICUR。效用采用欧洲质量生活 5 维度(EQ-5D)进行测量,以计算质量调整生命年(QALY)的收益。个人费用从法国国家健康保险数据库中提取。马尔可夫多态(MMS)模型评估了ICUR在整个生命周期内的演变情况:在纳入的 155 名参与者中,有 51 人选择了 CI 并接受了随机治疗。在 6 个月的随访期内,CI 后的 ICUR 为 422 279 欧元/QALY。使用 MMS 模型,CI 的 ICUR 在随访 10 年时降至 57,561 欧元/QALY,20 年时降至 38,006 欧元/QALY,50 年时降至 26,715 欧元。在重度耳鸣患者中,10 年的平均 ICUR 为 31,105 欧元/QALY:结论:在全球人群中,CI 在随访 20 年后可被视为治疗 SSD 和 AHL 的有效方法,而在随访 10 年前,对于伴有严重耳鸣的患者,CI 可被视为治疗 SSD 和 AHL 的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信