Sequential treatment of anti-PD-L1 therapy prior to anti-VEGFR2 therapy contributes to more significant clinical benefits in non-small cell lung cancer.
{"title":"Sequential treatment of anti-PD-L1 therapy prior to anti-VEGFR2 therapy contributes to more significant clinical benefits in non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Qiao-Xin Lin, Wen-Wen Song, Wen-Xia Xie, Yi-Ting Deng, Yan-Na Gong, Yi-Ru Liu, Yi Tian, Wen-Ya Zhao, Ling Tian, Dian-Na Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.neo.2024.101077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy are currently important treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the combined use of the two therapies is controversial, and few studies have investigated the effects of different time sequences of the two therapies on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tumor-bearing mouse model was established and the mice were divided into four groups, including AA-ICB sequence group, ICB-AA sequence group, synchronization group and the control group. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor microvessels and PD-L1 expression. Selected immune cell populations were evaluated using flow cytometry. Meta-analysis and clinical information were used to elucidate the clinical effects of administration sequence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that anti-PD-L1 treatment followed by anti-VEGFR2 therapy exerts the best inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Different sequences of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy resulted in different proportions of tumor microvessels and immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment. We further revealed that the administration of anti-PD-L1 before anti-VEGFR brought more normalized tumor blood vessels and CD8<sup>+</sup>T cell infiltration and reduced immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Subsequent re-transplantation experiments confirmed the long-term benefits of this treatment strategy. The meta-analysis reinforced that immunotherapy prior to anti-angiogenic therapy or combination therapy have better therapeutic effects in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of anti-angiogenic treatment after immune checkpoint therapy was superior to that of concurrent therapy, whereas anti-angiogenic therapy followed by immunotherapy did not bring more significant clinical benefits than independent monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48716,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasia","volume":"59 ","pages":"101077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2024.101077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy are currently important treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the combined use of the two therapies is controversial, and few studies have investigated the effects of different time sequences of the two therapies on treatment outcomes.
Methods: The tumor-bearing mouse model was established and the mice were divided into four groups, including AA-ICB sequence group, ICB-AA sequence group, synchronization group and the control group. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor microvessels and PD-L1 expression. Selected immune cell populations were evaluated using flow cytometry. Meta-analysis and clinical information were used to elucidate the clinical effects of administration sequence.
Results: We found that anti-PD-L1 treatment followed by anti-VEGFR2 therapy exerts the best inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Different sequences of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy resulted in different proportions of tumor microvessels and immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment. We further revealed that the administration of anti-PD-L1 before anti-VEGFR brought more normalized tumor blood vessels and CD8+T cell infiltration and reduced immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Subsequent re-transplantation experiments confirmed the long-term benefits of this treatment strategy. The meta-analysis reinforced that immunotherapy prior to anti-angiogenic therapy or combination therapy have better therapeutic effects in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of anti-angiogenic treatment after immune checkpoint therapy was superior to that of concurrent therapy, whereas anti-angiogenic therapy followed by immunotherapy did not bring more significant clinical benefits than independent monotherapy.
期刊介绍：
Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research. The title Neoplasia was chosen to convey the journal’s breadth, which encompasses the traditional disciplines of cancer research as well as emerging fields and interdisciplinary investigations. Neoplasia is interested in studies describing new molecular and genetic findings relating to the neoplastic phenotype and in laboratory and clinical studies demonstrating creative applications of advances in the basic sciences to risk assessment, prognostic indications, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition to regular Research Reports, Neoplasia also publishes Reviews and Meeting Reports. Neoplasia is committed to ensuring a thorough, fair, and rapid review and publication schedule to further its mission of serving both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating important data and ideas in cancer research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
