Developing Therapists' Multicultural Orientation Using Web-Based Deliberate Practice: An Initial Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability Study.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1037/pro0000583
Camille Y Williams, Jesse Owen, Tony Rousmaniere, Jordan Harris, Simon B Goldberg
{"title":"Developing Therapists' Multicultural Orientation Using Web-Based Deliberate Practice: An Initial Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability Study.","authors":"Camille Y Williams, Jesse Owen, Tony Rousmaniere, Jordan Harris, Simon B Goldberg","doi":"10.1037/pro0000583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The value of skillfully adopting a multicultural orientation (MCO) in psychotherapy has been increasingly recognized. Deliberate practice methods may be helpful in developing this capacity, but limited opportunities for practice and feedback exist. The current study provided an initial test of the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a self-guided, web-based deliberate practice tool designed to support the development of therapists' MCO: MCO Deliberate Practice Online (MCO-O). This tool included brief didactic instructions along with opportunities to practice responding to video vignettes of actors portraying clients discussing cultural topics in psychotherapy. A sample of therapists and trainees (<i>n</i> = 287) visited the MCO-O website and consented to the study. Recruitment through emails to listservs and a webinar was highly feasible. Quantitative ratings of usability were modest. Quantitative metrics of acceptability were also modest, with a minority of participants (18.8%) visiting the MCO-O website more than once and 51.2% of participants viewing two or more of the video vignettes. Younger participants found the MCO-O website more usable and having MCO-O assigned was associated with watching more videos, when controlling for participant demographics. Qualitative themes included a mixture of positive feedback along with critiques and confusion regarding the MCO-O website. Taken together, results highlight the potential of this approach along with important limitations. Ultimately, it may prove difficult for therapists and trainees to engage in self-guided MCO training, particularly if using software tools that have not undergone extensive (and potentially resource intensive) user experience testing and development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48217,"journal":{"name":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"55 5","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of skillfully adopting a multicultural orientation (MCO) in psychotherapy has been increasingly recognized. Deliberate practice methods may be helpful in developing this capacity, but limited opportunities for practice and feedback exist. The current study provided an initial test of the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a self-guided, web-based deliberate practice tool designed to support the development of therapists' MCO: MCO Deliberate Practice Online (MCO-O). This tool included brief didactic instructions along with opportunities to practice responding to video vignettes of actors portraying clients discussing cultural topics in psychotherapy. A sample of therapists and trainees (n = 287) visited the MCO-O website and consented to the study. Recruitment through emails to listservs and a webinar was highly feasible. Quantitative ratings of usability were modest. Quantitative metrics of acceptability were also modest, with a minority of participants (18.8%) visiting the MCO-O website more than once and 51.2% of participants viewing two or more of the video vignettes. Younger participants found the MCO-O website more usable and having MCO-O assigned was associated with watching more videos, when controlling for participant demographics. Qualitative themes included a mixture of positive feedback along with critiques and confusion regarding the MCO-O website. Taken together, results highlight the potential of this approach along with important limitations. Ultimately, it may prove difficult for therapists and trainees to engage in self-guided MCO training, particularly if using software tools that have not undergone extensive (and potentially resource intensive) user experience testing and development.

利用基于网络的审慎实践培养治疗师的多元文化取向:初步可行性、可用性和可接受性研究。
在心理治疗中巧妙地采用多元文化取向(MCO)的价值已日益得到认可。慎重的练习方法可能有助于培养这种能力,但练习和反馈的机会有限。目前的研究初步测试了一种基于网络的自我指导刻意练习工具的可行性、可用性和可接受性,该工具旨在支持治疗师发展 MCO:MCO 刻意练习在线(MCO-O)。该工具包括简短的教学指导,以及练习对演员扮演的客户在心理治疗中讨论文化话题的视频片段做出反应的机会。治疗师和受训人员样本(n = 287)访问了 MCO-O 网站并同意参与研究。通过邮件列表和网络研讨会进行招募的可行性很高。对可用性的量化评分并不高。可接受性的量化指标也不高,少数参与者(18.8%)访问了 MCO-O 网站一次以上,51.2% 的参与者观看了两个或两个以上的视频短片。较年轻的参与者认为 MCO-O 网站更易使用,而且在控制参与者人口统计学特征的情况下,指定 MCO-O 与观看更多视频有关。定性主题包括对 MCO-O 网站的积极反馈、批评和困惑。综上所述,研究结果凸显了这种方法的潜力以及重要的局限性。归根结底,治疗师和受训者可能很难参与自我指导的 MCO 培训,尤其是在使用未经过广泛的(可能需要大量资源的)用户体验测试和开发的软件工具时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice® publishes articles on the application of psychology, including the scientific underpinnings of the profession of psychology. Articles that present assessment, treatment, and practice implications are encouraged. Both data-based and theoretical articles on techniques and practices used in the application of psychology are acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信