Added Value of Medical Subject Headings Terms in Search Strategies of Systematic Reviews: Comparative Study.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victor Leblanc, Aghiles Hamroun, Raphaël Bentegeac, Bastien Le Guellec, Rémi Lenain, Emmanuel Chazard
{"title":"Added Value of Medical Subject Headings Terms in Search Strategies of Systematic Reviews: Comparative Study.","authors":"Victor Leblanc, Aghiles Hamroun, Raphaël Bentegeac, Bastien Le Guellec, Rémi Lenain, Emmanuel Chazard","doi":"10.2196/53781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The massive increase in the number of published scientific articles enhances knowledge but makes it more complicated to summarize results. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus was created in the mid-20th century with the aim of systematizing article indexing and facilitating their retrieval. Despite the advent of search engines, few studies have questioned the relevance of the MeSH thesaurus, and none have done so systematically.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to estimate the added value of using MeSH terms in PubMed queries for systematic reviews (SRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SRs published in 4 high-impact medical journals in general medicine over the past 10 years were selected. Only SRs for which a PubMed query was provided were included. Each query was transformed to obtain 3 versions: the original query (V1), the query with free-text terms only (V2), and the query with MeSH terms only (V3). These 3 queries were compared with each other based on their sensitivity and positive predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 59 SRs were included. The suppression of MeSH terms had an impact on the number of relevant articles retrieved for 24 (41%) out of 59 SRs. The median (IQR) sensitivities of queries V1 and V2 were 77.8% (62.1%-95.2%) and 71.4% (42.6%-90%), respectively. V1 queries provided an average of 2.62 additional relevant papers per SR compared with V2 queries. However, an additional 820.29 papers had to be screened. The cost of screening an additional collected paper was therefore 313.09, which was slightly more than triple the mean reading cost associated with V2 queries (88.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results revealed that removing MeSH terms from a query decreases sensitivity while slightly increasing the positive predictive value. Queries containing both MeSH and free-text terms yielded more relevant articles but required screening many additional papers. Despite this additional workload, MeSH terms remain indispensable for SRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e53781"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The massive increase in the number of published scientific articles enhances knowledge but makes it more complicated to summarize results. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus was created in the mid-20th century with the aim of systematizing article indexing and facilitating their retrieval. Despite the advent of search engines, few studies have questioned the relevance of the MeSH thesaurus, and none have done so systematically.

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the added value of using MeSH terms in PubMed queries for systematic reviews (SRs).

Methods: SRs published in 4 high-impact medical journals in general medicine over the past 10 years were selected. Only SRs for which a PubMed query was provided were included. Each query was transformed to obtain 3 versions: the original query (V1), the query with free-text terms only (V2), and the query with MeSH terms only (V3). These 3 queries were compared with each other based on their sensitivity and positive predictive values.

Results: In total, 59 SRs were included. The suppression of MeSH terms had an impact on the number of relevant articles retrieved for 24 (41%) out of 59 SRs. The median (IQR) sensitivities of queries V1 and V2 were 77.8% (62.1%-95.2%) and 71.4% (42.6%-90%), respectively. V1 queries provided an average of 2.62 additional relevant papers per SR compared with V2 queries. However, an additional 820.29 papers had to be screened. The cost of screening an additional collected paper was therefore 313.09, which was slightly more than triple the mean reading cost associated with V2 queries (88.67).

Conclusions: Our results revealed that removing MeSH terms from a query decreases sensitivity while slightly increasing the positive predictive value. Queries containing both MeSH and free-text terms yielded more relevant articles but required screening many additional papers. Despite this additional workload, MeSH terms remain indispensable for SRs.

系统综述检索策略中医学主题词的附加值:比较研究
背景:已发表的科学文章数量的大量增加增进了人们的知识,但也使总结结果变得更加复杂。医学主题词表(MeSH)词库创建于 20 世纪中期,目的是使文章索引系统化并方便检索。尽管出现了搜索引擎,但很少有研究对 MeSH 词库的相关性提出质疑,也没有系统性的研究:本研究旨在估算在 PubMed 查询系统性综述(SR)时使用 MeSH 术语的附加值:方法:选取了过去 10 年中在 4 种影响力较大的医学期刊上发表的普通医学领域的系统综述。只纳入提供了 PubMed 查询的 SR。每个查询都经过转换,得到 3 个版本:原始查询(V1)、仅包含自由文本术语的查询(V2)和仅包含 MeSH 术语的查询(V3)。根据灵敏度和阳性预测值对这 3 个查询进行了比较:结果:共纳入了 59 个 SR。在 59 个 SR 中,有 24 个(41%)抑制 MeSH 词影响了检索到的相关文章数量。查询 V1 和 V2 的灵敏度中位数(IQR)分别为 77.8%(62.1%-95.2%)和 71.4%(42.6%-90%)。与 V2 查询相比,V1 查询平均每 SR 多提供 2.62 篇相关论文。但是,需要额外筛选 820.29 篇论文。因此,筛选一篇额外收集论文的成本为 313.09,略高于 V2 查询相关平均阅读成本(88.67)的三倍:我们的研究结果表明,从查询中删除 MeSH 术语会降低灵敏度,但会略微提高阳性预测值。同时包含 MeSH 和自由文本术语的查询会产生更多相关文章,但需要筛选更多论文。尽管工作量增加了,但MeSH术语对于SR仍是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信