American College of Surgeons Operative Standards and Breast Cancer Outcomes.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Crystal D Taylor, Ton Wang, Alison S Baskin, Brandy Sinco, Tasha M Hughes, Daniel J Boffa, Judy C Boughey, Lesly A Dossett
{"title":"American College of Surgeons Operative Standards and Breast Cancer Outcomes.","authors":"Crystal D Taylor, Ton Wang, Alison S Baskin, Brandy Sinco, Tasha M Hughes, Daniel J Boffa, Judy C Boughey, Lesly A Dossett","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) operative standards were established to detail critical elements of cancer surgery, reduce technical variation, and improve outcomes. Two of the 6 operative standards target adequate axillary surgery for breast cancer. The potential association of the operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes, such as nodal yield and nodal positivity rates, is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the potential association of the ACS operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cohort study was performed using data on 1 201 317 women 18 years or older who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for invasive breast cancer from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patients were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a clinical oncology database encompassing approximately 70% of new cancer diagnoses, sourced from hospital registry data from 1317 facilities. Statistical analysis was performed from October 2023 to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy or ALND.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Reliability-adjusted facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity rate for each procedure were calculated using generalized linear mixed models, Poisson regression, and logistic regression with facility-level random intercepts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 1 201 317 women with a median age of 62 years (IQR, 53-70 years). Facility-level nodal yield ranged from 1 to 6 for SLNB and from 6 to 22 for ALND. Median facility-level nodal yield for SLNB was 2.6 (IQR, 2.3-3.0) and the nodal positivity rate for SLNB was 12.2% (IQR, 11.0%-13.7%), with rates ranging from 6% to 21%. A weak correlation between facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.17). Median nodal upstaging rate (≥4 positive nodes) for ALND was 30.5% (IQR, 26.5%-35.0%), with rates ranging from 11% to 54%; median nodal yield was 12.2 (IQR, 10.9-13.6). A strong correlation between nodal yield and nodal upstaging rates was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of women undergoing axillary surgery for invasive breast cancer, facility-level variation in lymph node yield was present for both SLNB and ALND, which could potentially be improved through the ACS operative standards. However, this variation had mixed associations with nodal positivity and upstaging rates, suggesting the association of the ACS operative standards with oncologic outcomes may be mixed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2446345"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) operative standards were established to detail critical elements of cancer surgery, reduce technical variation, and improve outcomes. Two of the 6 operative standards target adequate axillary surgery for breast cancer. The potential association of the operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes, such as nodal yield and nodal positivity rates, is currently unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the potential association of the ACS operative standards with short-term oncologic outcomes in breast cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: A cohort study was performed using data on 1 201 317 women 18 years or older who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for invasive breast cancer from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patients were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a clinical oncology database encompassing approximately 70% of new cancer diagnoses, sourced from hospital registry data from 1317 facilities. Statistical analysis was performed from October 2023 to June 2024.

Exposure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy or ALND.

Main outcomes and measures: Reliability-adjusted facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity rate for each procedure were calculated using generalized linear mixed models, Poisson regression, and logistic regression with facility-level random intercepts.

Results: The cohort included 1 201 317 women with a median age of 62 years (IQR, 53-70 years). Facility-level nodal yield ranged from 1 to 6 for SLNB and from 6 to 22 for ALND. Median facility-level nodal yield for SLNB was 2.6 (IQR, 2.3-3.0) and the nodal positivity rate for SLNB was 12.2% (IQR, 11.0%-13.7%), with rates ranging from 6% to 21%. A weak correlation between facility-level lymph node yield and nodal positivity was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.17). Median nodal upstaging rate (≥4 positive nodes) for ALND was 30.5% (IQR, 26.5%-35.0%), with rates ranging from 11% to 54%; median nodal yield was 12.2 (IQR, 10.9-13.6). A strong correlation between nodal yield and nodal upstaging rates was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.53).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of women undergoing axillary surgery for invasive breast cancer, facility-level variation in lymph node yield was present for both SLNB and ALND, which could potentially be improved through the ACS operative standards. However, this variation had mixed associations with nodal positivity and upstaging rates, suggesting the association of the ACS operative standards with oncologic outcomes may be mixed.

美国外科学院手术标准与乳腺癌治疗效果。
重要性:美国外科学院(ACS)手术标准的制定旨在详细说明癌症手术的关键要素,减少技术差异,提高手术效果。6 项手术标准中有 2 项针对乳腺癌的适当腋窝手术。目前尚不清楚手术标准与结节率和结节阳性率等短期肿瘤治疗效果之间的潜在联系:评估 ACS 手术标准与乳腺癌短期肿瘤治疗效果的潜在关联:一项队列研究使用了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间因浸润性乳腺癌接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)或腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的 1 201 317 名 18 岁及以上女性的数据。患者通过国家癌症数据库 (NCDB) 确定,该数据库是一个临床肿瘤学数据库,包含约 70% 的新诊断癌症病例,数据来源于 1317 家机构的医院登记数据。统计分析于2023年10月至2024年6月进行。暴露:前哨淋巴结活检或ALND:使用广义线性混合模型、泊松回归和带有设施水平随机截距的逻辑回归计算每种手术的可靠性调整设施水平淋巴结产量和结节阳性率:研究对象包括 1 201 317 名女性,中位年龄为 62 岁(IQR,53-70 岁)。SLNB的机构水平结节率从1到6不等,ALND的机构水平结节率从6到22不等。SLNB的中位设施水平结节率为2.6(IQR,2.3-3.0),SLNB的结节阳性率为12.2%(IQR,11.0%-13.7%),阳性率范围为6%-21%。据观察,设施级淋巴结产量与结节阳性率之间存在微弱的相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数,0.17)。ALND的中位结节上分期率(≥4个阳性结节)为30.5%(IQR,26.5%-35.0%),范围在11%至54%之间;中位结节产量为12.2(IQR,10.9-13.6)。结节率与结节上分期率之间存在很强的相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数,0.53):在这项针对因浸润性乳腺癌而接受腋窝手术的女性进行的队列研究中,SLNB 和 ALND 的淋巴结切除率存在设施水平上的差异,通过 ACS 手术标准有可能得到改善。然而,这种差异与结节阳性率和上行分期率的关系不一,这表明 ACS 手术标准与肿瘤预后的关系可能好坏参半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信