A genuine need or nice to have? Understanding HTA representatives' perspectives on the use of patient preference data.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evi Germeni, Simon Fifer, Mickaël Hiligsmann, Barry Stein, Mandy Tonkinson, Maya Joshi, Alissa Hanna, Barry Liden, Deborah A Marshall
{"title":"A genuine need or nice to have? Understanding HTA representatives' perspectives on the use of patient preference data.","authors":"Evi Germeni, Simon Fifer, Mickaël Hiligsmann, Barry Stein, Mandy Tonkinson, Maya Joshi, Alissa Hanna, Barry Liden, Deborah A Marshall","doi":"10.1017/S026646232400463X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The roles and potential value of patient preference (PP) data in health technology assessment (HTA) remain to be fully realized despite an expanding literature and various efforts to establish their utility. This article reports lessons learned through a series of collaborative workshops with HTA representatives, organized by the Health Technology Assessment International's Patient Preferences Project Subcommittee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five online workshops were conducted between June 2022 and June 2023, seeking to facilitate collaborative learning and reflection on ways that PP data can be integrated into HTA. Participants included nine HTA representatives from the United States, Canada, Australia, England, and the Netherlands. Workshops were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite appreciating the value of PP data, participants were ambivalent about their use in HTA. Some felt that they were already getting the information they needed from the cost-effectiveness analysis or existing patient involvement processes. Others thought that PP data would be very helpful at the initial and final stage of the decision-making process and, particularly, in the following cases: (a) when technology has important non-health benefits; (b) when the clinical and/or cost-effectiveness evidence is marginal; and (c) when treatment is indicated for a large and heterogeneous population. Issues related to the validity and reliability of PP studies were frequently raised, with preference heterogeneity at the core of these concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborating with HTA representatives in the \"co-creation\" of PP research can help address their concerns and facilitate mutual learning about how PP data can be used in HTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"e60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646232400463X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The roles and potential value of patient preference (PP) data in health technology assessment (HTA) remain to be fully realized despite an expanding literature and various efforts to establish their utility. This article reports lessons learned through a series of collaborative workshops with HTA representatives, organized by the Health Technology Assessment International's Patient Preferences Project Subcommittee.

Methods: Five online workshops were conducted between June 2022 and June 2023, seeking to facilitate collaborative learning and reflection on ways that PP data can be integrated into HTA. Participants included nine HTA representatives from the United States, Canada, Australia, England, and the Netherlands. Workshops were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

Results: Despite appreciating the value of PP data, participants were ambivalent about their use in HTA. Some felt that they were already getting the information they needed from the cost-effectiveness analysis or existing patient involvement processes. Others thought that PP data would be very helpful at the initial and final stage of the decision-making process and, particularly, in the following cases: (a) when technology has important non-health benefits; (b) when the clinical and/or cost-effectiveness evidence is marginal; and (c) when treatment is indicated for a large and heterogeneous population. Issues related to the validity and reliability of PP studies were frequently raised, with preference heterogeneity at the core of these concerns.

Conclusions: Collaborating with HTA representatives in the "co-creation" of PP research can help address their concerns and facilitate mutual learning about how PP data can be used in HTA.

是真正需要还是锦上添花?了解 HTA 代表对使用患者偏好数据的看法。
目的:患者偏好(PP)数据在卫生技术评估(HTA)中的作用和潜在价值仍有待充分认识,尽管相关文献和各种努力都在不断扩大其实用性。本文报告了由国际健康技术评估组织患者偏好项目小组委员会组织的一系列与健康技术评估代表合作研讨会的经验教训:方法:在2022年6月至2023年6月期间举办了五次在线研讨会,旨在促进合作学习,并思考如何将患者偏好数据纳入健康技术评估。与会者包括来自美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、英国和荷兰的九位 HTA 代表。对研讨会进行了记录、转录和主题分析:结果:尽管与会者都很欣赏PP数据的价值,但对其在HTA中的应用却持矛盾态度。一些人认为,他们已经从成本效益分析或现有的患者参与过程中获得了所需的信息。另一些人则认为,在决策过程的初始和最后阶段,特别是在以下情况下,参与计划数据将非常有用:(a) 当技术具有重要的非健康益处时;(b) 当临床和/或成本效益证据微不足道时;(c) 当治疗适用于大量异质性人群时。与 PP 研究的有效性和可靠性有关的问题经常被提出,而偏好异质性是这些问题的核心:结论:与 HTA 代表合作 "共同创造 "参与式研究有助于解决他们所关注的问题,并促进相互学习如何在 HTA 中使用参与式研究数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信