Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing in unselected patients: example of private supplementation of public healthcare service.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Francesca Fiorentino, Giovanni Innella, Federica Balducci, Laura Marullo, Giulia Lanzoni, Sara Miccoli, Laura Cardarelli, Daniela Turchetti, Sergio Tempesta
{"title":"Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing in unselected patients: example of private supplementation of public healthcare service.","authors":"Francesca Fiorentino, Giovanni Innella, Federica Balducci, Laura Marullo, Giulia Lanzoni, Sara Miccoli, Laura Cardarelli, Daniela Turchetti, Sergio Tempesta","doi":"10.1007/s10689-024-00426-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the Emilia-Romagna region (Northern Italy), the identification and management of women at familial/hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer is guided by a well-established regional protocol. Here we report the results of the experience of private supplementation of public healthcare service in offering the possibility to undergo BRCA1/2 testing and/or multigene panel testing (MGPT) within a well-defined pathway to women unfulfilling regional criteria. Out of 177 patients referred to our center who underwent BRCA1/2 testing, 175 tested negative while two (1.1%) resulted carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA2; 69 patients also underwent MGPT, and in four cases (5.8%) a pathogenic variant were found (two in ATM and one in CHEK2 and RAD51C, respectively). Overall, this private supplementation of territorial public healthcare system has made it possible to confirm the validity of regional criteria for genetic testing access (concordance: 98.9%), but also to identify carriers of pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 that would have escaped regional protocol, to support the effectiveness of MGPT for the identification of rare cases (not BRCA) at mild/high risk, and to provide reassurance to women who were found to be non-carriers of pathogenic variants, who may benefit from a more accurate assessment of their risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-024-00426-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Emilia-Romagna region (Northern Italy), the identification and management of women at familial/hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer is guided by a well-established regional protocol. Here we report the results of the experience of private supplementation of public healthcare service in offering the possibility to undergo BRCA1/2 testing and/or multigene panel testing (MGPT) within a well-defined pathway to women unfulfilling regional criteria. Out of 177 patients referred to our center who underwent BRCA1/2 testing, 175 tested negative while two (1.1%) resulted carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA2; 69 patients also underwent MGPT, and in four cases (5.8%) a pathogenic variant were found (two in ATM and one in CHEK2 and RAD51C, respectively). Overall, this private supplementation of territorial public healthcare system has made it possible to confirm the validity of regional criteria for genetic testing access (concordance: 98.9%), but also to identify carriers of pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 that would have escaped regional protocol, to support the effectiveness of MGPT for the identification of rare cases (not BRCA) at mild/high risk, and to provide reassurance to women who were found to be non-carriers of pathogenic variants, who may benefit from a more accurate assessment of their risk.

对未经选择的患者进行遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测:私人补充公共医疗服务的实例。
在艾米利亚-罗马涅大区(意大利北部),对有乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族/遗传风险的妇女的识别和管理是在一个完善的地区协议指导下进行的。在此,我们报告了私立医疗机构对公共医疗服务进行补充的经验,即在明确规定的途径内,为不符合地区标准的妇女提供进行 BRCA1/2 检测和/或多基因面板检测 (MGPT) 的可能性。在转诊到本中心接受 BRCA1/2 检测的 177 名患者中,175 人检测结果为阴性,2 人(1.1%)为 BRCA2 致病变体携带者;69 名患者也接受了多基因检测,其中 4 人(5.8%)发现了致病变体(分别为 ATM 中的 2 个变体、CHEK2 和 RAD51C 中的 1 个变体)。总之,这种对地区公共医疗系统的私人补充,不仅证实了地区基因检测准入标准的有效性(一致性:98.9%),而且还发现了可能逃脱地区协议的 BRCA1/2 致病变体携带者,支持了 MGPT 在发现轻度/高风险罕见病例(非 BRCA)方面的有效性,并为被发现不是致病变体携带者的妇女提供了保证,她们可能会从更准确的风险评估中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信