Access to medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases in Chile: qualitative analysis of perceived patient barriers and facilitators in five regions of the country.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carla Castillo-Laborde, Isabel Matute, Ximena Sgombich, Daniel Jofré
{"title":"Access to medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases in Chile: qualitative analysis of perceived patient barriers and facilitators in five regions of the country.","authors":"Carla Castillo-Laborde, Isabel Matute, Ximena Sgombich, Daniel Jofré","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11900-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to medicines is one of the most serious public health problems globally, and Chile is not an exception. The aim of this study was to explore patients' perceptions, beneficiaries of both public and private health sectors, of barriers and facilitators in access to medicines in general, and those associated with the treatment of diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten focus groups of patients with these diseases, diagnosed for at least six months and with prescribed medication, were carried out in five regions of Chile: Arica (north), Aysén (south), and Valparaíso, Metropolitan, and Maule (center).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experience of access to medicines is determined by the insurance system, the experience of care with public or private providers, and geographical-administrative difference between capital and other regions. Beneficiaries of public sector value territorial coverage of primary care, which guarantees access in isolated areas and, despite their greater socioeconomic vulnerability, perceive greater protection in access (access conditions, delivery reliability and adherence to pharmacological treatment). The main problem observed is the financing of treatments not covered by the system. Beneficiaries of private sector perceive that they have access to medicines of better quality than those provided free of charge by public sector, but raise fears associated with the inability to afford them and distrust in the market process. Regarding the type of provider, public sector shows greater capacity for user loyalty, which is expressed in regular visits and follow-up, unlike discontinuous examinations among private sector beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different access conditions both at the territorial level and in the health subsystems are evident. It is necessary to make progress in addressing the problem of access to medicines in a comprehensive manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11900-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to medicines is one of the most serious public health problems globally, and Chile is not an exception. The aim of this study was to explore patients' perceptions, beneficiaries of both public and private health sectors, of barriers and facilitators in access to medicines in general, and those associated with the treatment of diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension.

Methods: Ten focus groups of patients with these diseases, diagnosed for at least six months and with prescribed medication, were carried out in five regions of Chile: Arica (north), Aysén (south), and Valparaíso, Metropolitan, and Maule (center).

Results: The experience of access to medicines is determined by the insurance system, the experience of care with public or private providers, and geographical-administrative difference between capital and other regions. Beneficiaries of public sector value territorial coverage of primary care, which guarantees access in isolated areas and, despite their greater socioeconomic vulnerability, perceive greater protection in access (access conditions, delivery reliability and adherence to pharmacological treatment). The main problem observed is the financing of treatments not covered by the system. Beneficiaries of private sector perceive that they have access to medicines of better quality than those provided free of charge by public sector, but raise fears associated with the inability to afford them and distrust in the market process. Regarding the type of provider, public sector shows greater capacity for user loyalty, which is expressed in regular visits and follow-up, unlike discontinuous examinations among private sector beneficiaries.

Conclusions: Different access conditions both at the territorial level and in the health subsystems are evident. It is necessary to make progress in addressing the problem of access to medicines in a comprehensive manner.

智利慢性病治疗药物的获取:对智利五个地区患者感知到的障碍和促进因素的定性分析。
背景:获得药品是全球最严重的公共卫生问题之一,智利也不例外。本研究旨在探讨公共和私营卫生部门的受益者、患者对获取药物的一般障碍和便利因素的看法,以及与治疗糖尿病、血脂异常和高血压相关的障碍和便利因素:在智利的五个地区开展了十个焦点小组活动,这些小组的成员都是至少确诊六个月并服用处方药的上述疾病患者:方法:在智利的五个大区,即阿里卡(北部)、艾森(南部)、瓦尔帕莱索、大都会和莫莱(中部),开展了十次焦点小组讨论:结果:获得药品的经历取决于保险制度、在公立或私立医疗机构就医的经历以及首都与其他地区之间的地理行政差异。公共部门的受益者重视初级保健的地域覆盖范围,这保证了他们在偏远地区也能获得医疗服务,尽管他们在社会经济方面更加脆弱,但他们认为在获得医疗服务方面(就医条件、提供服务的可靠性和坚持药物治疗)有更大的保障。观察到的主要问题是为不在系统覆盖范围内的治疗提供资金。私营部门的受益者认为,与公共部门免费提供的药品相比,他们可以获得质量更好的药 品,但他们也担心买不起药品,对市场过程不信任。就提供者的类型而言,公共部门显示出更强的用户忠诚度,这表现在定期访问和后续跟踪上,而私营部门受益人的检查则不连续:结论:在地区层面和医疗子系统中,明显存在不同的就医条件。有必要在全面解决药品获取问题方面取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信