Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs)

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Chien-An Liao, Yi-Jun Chen, Shih-Jyun Shen, Qi-An Wang, Szu-An Chen, Chien-Hung Liao, Jr-Rung Lin, Chao-Wei Lee, Hsin-I Tsai
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs)","authors":"Chien-An Liao, Yi-Jun Chen, Shih-Jyun Shen, Qi-An Wang, Szu-An Chen, Chien-Hung Liao, Jr-Rung Lin, Chao-Wei Lee, Hsin-I Tsai","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00567-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, opioid and inhalation anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic effects in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs). We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures between May 2020 and December 2023. The patients were allocated into the ESPB group or the control group. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, total intraoperative opioid consumption, the average minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anesthetics, postoperative simple analgesics and opioid consumption and the length of hospital stay were included in the analysis. Compared with the control group, the ESPB group had a lower heart rate (HR) in the first 90 min after surgical incision and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the beginning of surgery. Intraoperatively, a notable reduction in fentanyl consumption was observed in the ESPB group (p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed in the average MAC of inhalational agents (p = 0.073). Postoperatively, the ESPB group required fewer doses of simple analgesics in the first 24 h (p < 0.001) and 48 h (p = 0.029). No statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p = 0.608) was observed between the groups. ESPB was shown to enhance intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduce opioid consumption and decrease postoperative analgesic consumption in patients who underwent SSRF. These results suggest that ESPB may serve as a valuable component of multimodal analgesia protocols for SSRF. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results and evaluate long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00567-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, opioid and inhalation anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic effects in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs). We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures between May 2020 and December 2023. The patients were allocated into the ESPB group or the control group. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, total intraoperative opioid consumption, the average minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anesthetics, postoperative simple analgesics and opioid consumption and the length of hospital stay were included in the analysis. Compared with the control group, the ESPB group had a lower heart rate (HR) in the first 90 min after surgical incision and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the beginning of surgery. Intraoperatively, a notable reduction in fentanyl consumption was observed in the ESPB group (p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed in the average MAC of inhalational agents (p = 0.073). Postoperatively, the ESPB group required fewer doses of simple analgesics in the first 24 h (p < 0.001) and 48 h (p = 0.029). No statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p = 0.608) was observed between the groups. ESPB was shown to enhance intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduce opioid consumption and decrease postoperative analgesic consumption in patients who underwent SSRF. These results suggest that ESPB may serve as a valuable component of multimodal analgesia protocols for SSRF. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results and evaluate long-term outcomes.
脊柱后凸平面阻滞(ESPB)可增强血流动力学稳定性,减少肋骨骨折(SSRF)手术稳定过程中的镇痛需求
目的:评估竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对接受手术稳定肋骨骨折(SSRFs)患者术中血流动力学稳定性、阿片类药物和吸入麻醉剂需求以及术后镇痛效果的影响。我们对 2020 年 5 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受肋骨骨折手术稳定治疗的 173 例患者进行了回顾性研究。这些患者被分配到ESPB组或对照组。分析包括人口统计学数据、术中血流动力学参数、术中阿片类药物的总消耗量、吸入麻醉剂的平均最小肺泡浓度(MAC)、术后简单镇痛剂和阿片类药物的消耗量以及住院时间。与对照组相比,ESPB 组在手术切口后 90 分钟内心率(HR)较低,手术开始时收缩压(SBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)较低。术中观察到,ESPB 组的芬太尼用量明显减少(p = 0.004),而吸入剂的平均 MAC 没有明显差异(p = 0.073)。术后,ESPB 组在最初 24 小时(p < 0.001)和 48 小时(p = 0.029)内所需的简单镇痛剂剂量较少。两组的住院时间(p = 0.608)无统计学差异。研究表明,ESPB 可增强接受 SSRF 患者术中血流动力学的稳定性、减少阿片类药物的用量并降低术后镇痛药的用量。这些结果表明,ESPB 可作为 SSRF 多模式镇痛方案的重要组成部分。我们有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确认结果并评估长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信