The Constructive Deconstruction of Mary Overlie's Six Viewpoints

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
S. Daniel Cullen
{"title":"The Constructive Deconstruction of Mary Overlie's Six Viewpoints","authors":"S. Daniel Cullen","doi":"10.1017/s0040557424000309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since its publication in 2005, Anne Bogart and Tina Landau's <span>The Viewpoints Book: A Practical Guide to Viewpoints and Composition</span> has provided the received narrative not only for the ways that Viewpoints training is practiced, but also for its history. In their opening chapter, the authors crucially acknowledge that they did not invent this method of training:</p><p>In 1979, Anne met choreographer Mary Overlie, the inventor of the “Six Viewpoints,” at New York University, where they were both on the faculty of the Experimental Theater Wing. Although a latecomer to the Judson scene, Mary, who had trained as a dancer and choreographer, attributes her own innovations to those Judson Church experiments. . . . Mary immersed herself in these innovations and came up with her own way to structure dance improvisation in time and space—the Six Viewpoints: Space, Shape, Time, Emotion, Movement, and Story. She began to apply these principles, not only to her own work as a choreographer, but also to her teaching.</p>Although Bogart and Landau claim the necessary authority to bring this “practical guide” into the marketplace, they make no secret of the fact that their work derives from Mary Overlie's innovations. To obfuscate on this point would have been a grave misstep causing outcry from the hundreds of performers who studied with Overlie over the preceding three decades. Many of those students have contested Bogart and Landau's implication that Overlie's purpose on the Experimental Theater Wing faculty was specifically to teach dance. Even giving Bogart and Landau the benefit of the doubt on that point, this acknowledgment alone would raise questions about why these authors feel they have the right to publish the definitive work on Viewpoints training—and why they now list <span>nine</span> viewpoints, which exclude some of the original six. To these questions, Bogart and Landau say:<p>To Anne (and later Tina), it was instantly clear that Mary's approach to generating movement for the stage was applicable to creating viscerally dynamic moments of theater with actors and other collaborators.</p><p></p>","PeriodicalId":42777,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE SURVEY","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE SURVEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0040557424000309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its publication in 2005, Anne Bogart and Tina Landau's The Viewpoints Book: A Practical Guide to Viewpoints and Composition has provided the received narrative not only for the ways that Viewpoints training is practiced, but also for its history. In their opening chapter, the authors crucially acknowledge that they did not invent this method of training:

In 1979, Anne met choreographer Mary Overlie, the inventor of the “Six Viewpoints,” at New York University, where they were both on the faculty of the Experimental Theater Wing. Although a latecomer to the Judson scene, Mary, who had trained as a dancer and choreographer, attributes her own innovations to those Judson Church experiments. . . . Mary immersed herself in these innovations and came up with her own way to structure dance improvisation in time and space—the Six Viewpoints: Space, Shape, Time, Emotion, Movement, and Story. She began to apply these principles, not only to her own work as a choreographer, but also to her teaching.

Although Bogart and Landau claim the necessary authority to bring this “practical guide” into the marketplace, they make no secret of the fact that their work derives from Mary Overlie's innovations. To obfuscate on this point would have been a grave misstep causing outcry from the hundreds of performers who studied with Overlie over the preceding three decades. Many of those students have contested Bogart and Landau's implication that Overlie's purpose on the Experimental Theater Wing faculty was specifically to teach dance. Even giving Bogart and Landau the benefit of the doubt on that point, this acknowledgment alone would raise questions about why these authors feel they have the right to publish the definitive work on Viewpoints training—and why they now list nine viewpoints, which exclude some of the original six. To these questions, Bogart and Landau say:

To Anne (and later Tina), it was instantly clear that Mary's approach to generating movement for the stage was applicable to creating viscerally dynamic moments of theater with actors and other collaborators.

对玛丽-奥弗利 "六种观点 "的建设性解构
自 2005 年出版以来,安妮-博格特和蒂娜-兰道的《观点手册》(The Viewpoints Book:视点与构图实用指南》不仅为视点训练的实践方式,也为其历史提供了公认的说法。1979 年,安妮在纽约大学遇到了编舞家玛丽-奥弗利,她是 "六视点 "的发明者。虽然玛丽是贾德森舞台的后来者,但她曾接受过舞蹈家和编舞家的训练,她将自己的创新归功于贾德森教堂的那些实验。. . .玛丽沉浸在这些创新中,并提出了自己的即兴舞蹈时空结构--"六视点":空间、形状、时间、情感、动作和故事。尽管博格特和兰道声称自己是将这本 "实用指南 "带入市场的必要权威,但他们毫不掩饰自己的作品源自玛丽-奥弗莉的创新这一事实。如果在这一点上含糊其辞,将是一个严重的失误,会引起数百名在过去 30 年中跟随奥弗利学习的表演者的强烈不满。许多学生对 Bogart 和 Landau 暗示 Overlie 在实验剧场翼的目的是专门教授舞蹈提出了质疑。即使博加特和兰道对这一点持怀疑态度,仅这一点就会让人产生疑问:为什么这些作者认为他们有权出版关于观点培训的权威著作--为什么他们现在列出了九种观点,却排除了原来六种观点中的一些观点。对于这些问题,博格特和兰道说:对安妮(后来是蒂娜)来说,玛丽为舞台创造动作的方法很明显也适用于与演员和其他合作者一起创造戏剧的内涵动态时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THEATRE SURVEY
THEATRE SURVEY THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信